Implementation of recursive nonparametric kernel estimation and a monte carlo study on its finite sample properties

1996 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-79
Author(s):  
Anthony Ngerng
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Kernel Estimation ◽  
Monte Carlo Study ◽  
Finite Sample ◽  
Finite Sample Properties ◽  
Nonparametric Kernel ◽  
Nonparametric Kernel Estimation

KERNEL AND BANDWIDTH SELECTION, PREWHITENING, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF THE FULLY MODIFIED LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATION METHOD

2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 948-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Christou ◽  
Nikitas Pittis
Keyword(s):  
Least Squares ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Bandwidth Selection ◽  
Kernel Estimation ◽  
Kernel Estimator ◽  
Monte Carlo Study ◽  
Finite Sample ◽  
Cointegrating Vector ◽  
Bandwidth Parameter ◽  
Finite Sample Properties

This paper examines several practical issues regarding the implementation of the Phillips and Hansen fully modified least squares (FMLS) method for the estimation of a cointegrating vector. Various versions of this method arise by selecting between standard and prewhitened kernel estimation and between parametric and nonparametric automatic bandwidth estimators and also among alternative kernels. A Monte Carlo study is conducted to investigate the finite-sample properties of the alternative versions of the FMLS procedure. The results suggest that the prewhitened kernel estimator of Andrews and Monahan (1992, Econometrica 60, 953–966) in which the bandwidth parameter is selected via the nonparametric procedure of Newey and West (1994, Review of Economic Studies 61, 631–653) minimizes the second-order asymptotic bias effects.

SPATIAL DEPENDENCE IN OPTION OBSERVATION ERRORS

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-43
Author(s):  
Torben G. Andersen ◽  
Nicola Fusari ◽  
Viktor Todorov ◽  
Rasmus T. Varneskov
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Dependence ◽  
Option Price ◽  
Monte Carlo Study ◽  
Nonparametric Test ◽  
Testing Procedure ◽  
Observation Error ◽  
Finite Sample ◽  
Finite Sample Properties ◽  
Observation Times ◽  
Index Option

In this paper, we develop the first formal nonparametric test for whether the observation errors in option panels display spatial dependence. The panel consists of options with different strikes and tenors written on a given underlying asset. The asymptotic design is of the infill type—the mesh of the strike grid for the observed options shrinks asymptotically to zero, while the set of observation times and tenors for the option panel remains fixed. We propose a Portmanteau test for the null hypothesis of no spatial autocorrelation in the observation error. The test makes use of the smoothness of the true (unobserved) option price as a function of its strike and is robust to the presence of heteroskedasticity of unknown form in the observation error. A Monte Carlo study shows good finite-sample properties of the developed testing procedure and an empirical application to S&P 500 index option data reveals mild spatial dependence in the observation error, which has been declining in recent years.

scholarly journals Indirect Inference Estimation of Spatial Autoregressions

Econometrics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Yong Bao ◽  
Xiaotian Liu ◽  
Lihong Yang
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Asymptotic Distribution ◽  
Monte Carlo Study ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Indirect Inference ◽  
Finite Sample ◽  
Spatial Unit ◽  
Asymptotically Normal ◽  
Distribution Result

The ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator for spatial autoregressions may be consistent as pointed out by Lee (2002), provided that each spatial unit is influenced aggregately by a significant portion of the total units. This paper presents a unified asymptotic distribution result of the properly recentered OLS estimator and proposes a new estimator that is based on the indirect inference (II) procedure. The resulting estimator can always be used regardless of the degree of aggregate influence on each spatial unit from other units and is consistent and asymptotically normal. The new estimator does not rely on distributional assumptions and is robust to unknown heteroscedasticity. Its good finite-sample performance, in comparison with existing estimators that are also robust to heteroscedasticity, is demonstrated by a Monte Carlo study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document