Comparative psychophysical characteristics of cutaneous CO2 laser and contact heat stimulation

1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER SVENSSON ◽  
BARRY ROSENBERG ◽  
AHMAD BEYDOUN ◽  
THOMAS MORROW ◽  
KENNETH CASEY
2002 ◽  
Vol 318 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Valeriani ◽  
Domenica Le Pera ◽  
David Niddam ◽  
Andrew C.N Chen ◽  
Lars Arendt-Nielsen

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 1902-1914 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Craig ◽  
D. Andrew

It was recently shown that repeated heat stimulation, using brief contacts (<1 s) with a preheated thermode at sufficiently short interstimulus intervals (ISIs <5 s) and high temperatures (≥51°C), will elicit in humans a sensation of rapidly augmenting “second” (burning) pain with only a weak “first” (sharp) pain sensation. Most strikingly, at short intertrial intervals (ITIs >5 s) such summation will reset, or begin again at baseline. In the present experiments, the responses of nociceptive lamina I spinothalamic (STT) neurons in the lumbosacral dorsal horn of barbiturate-anesthetized cats were examined using this repeated brief contact heat paradigm. The neurons were classified as nociceptive-specific (NS, n = 8) or polymodal nociceptive (HPC, n = 8) based on their responses to quantitative thermal stimuli; all had receptive fields on the glabrous ventral hindpaw. A pneumatic piston was used to apply a thermode preheated to 34, 46, 49, 53, or 58°C with a contact dwell time of ∼0.7 s to the ventral hindpaw repeatedly (15 times) at ISIs of 2, 3, and 5 s, with 3–5 min between trials. The mean responses of the 16 nociceptive lamina I STT cells showed rapid temporal summation that was directly dependent on temperature and inversely dependent on ISI, with the greatest increases occurring between the 3rd and 10th contacts. The temporal profiles of this family of curves correspond with the psychophysical data on human sensation. Further analysis showed that this summation was due to the HPC cells, which all showed strong summation; in contrast, the NS cells showed little, if any. The HPC responses to the repeated heat stimuli lagged each contact by ∼1 s, consistent with the strong, monosynaptic C-fiber input that is characteristic of HPC cells and also with the dependence of second pain on C-fiber nociceptors. HPC cells also displayed the reset phenomenon at short ITIs, again in correspondence with the psychophysical data. The summation and the reset displayed by HPC cells were not related to skin temperature. Thus the results presented in this study, together with those in the preceding article, demonstrate a double dissociation indicating that NS and HPC lamina I STT cells can subserve the qualitatively distinct sensations of first (sharp) and second (burning) pain, respectively. These findings support the concept that the lamina I STT projection comprises several discrete sensory channels that are integrated in the forebrain to generate distinct sensations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iara De Schoenmacker ◽  
Carson Berry ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Blouin ◽  
Jan Rosner ◽  
Michèle Hubli ◽  
...  

AbstractPrevious studies comparing laser (LEPs) and contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) consistently reported higher amplitudes following laser compared to contact heat stimulation. However, none of the studies matched the perceived pain intensity, questioning if the observed difference in amplitude is due to biophysical differences between the two methods or a mismatch in stimulation intensity. The aims of the current study were twofold: (1) to directly compare the brain potentials induced by intensity matched laser and contact heat stimulation and (2) investigate how capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia modulates LEPs and CHEPs. Twenty-one healthy subjects were recruited and measured at four experimental sessions: (1) CHEPs + sham, (2) LEPs + sham, (3) CHEPs + capsaicin, and (4) LEPs + capsaicin. Baseline (sham) LEPs latency was significantly shorter and amplitude significantly larger compared to CHEPs, even when matched for perceived pain. Neither CHEPs nor LEPs was sensitive enough to detect secondary hyperalgesia. These differences provide evidence that a faster heating rate results in an earlier and more synchronized LEPs than CHEPs. To our knowledge, this was the first study to match perceived intensity of contact heat and laser stimulations, revealing distinct advantages associated with the acquisition of LEPs.


1979 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Stuart Strong ◽  
Charles W. Vaughan ◽  
Geza J. Jako ◽  
Thomas Polanyi

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
SHARON WORCESTER
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
ROBIN TURNER
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 875-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Dubreuil ◽  
P. Pignolet ◽  
A. Catherinot ◽  
P. Davy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document