Development and validation of caregiver stress and support scale for caregivers of individuals with disabilities in Singapore

Author(s):  
Belinda H. Teo ◽  
Vaishali V. Raval
2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Brent K. Hollenbeck ◽  
J. Stuart Wolf ◽  
Rodney L. Dunn ◽  
Martin G. Sanda ◽  
David P. Wood ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Frank Häßler ◽  
Michael Burgert ◽  
Jörg Michael Fegert ◽  
Wencke Chodan

Der Begriff Inklusion (= Einschluss, Dazugehörigkeit) wird geradezu synonym für die gemeinsame Beschulung von Kindern mit und ohne Behinderung des Lernens, der Sprache, des Körpers und/oder der Seele verwendet. Der vorliegende Artikel behandelt den Stand inklusiver Beschulung in Deutschland sowie internationale Entwicklungen wie die Salamanca-Erklärung der UNESCO, den «Individuals with Disabilities Act» (IDEA) der USA sowie den Stand und ausgewählte Fortschritte im europäischen Raum, insbesondere in Großbritannien, Österreich und Russland. Obwohl aus politischer Sicht die Entscheidung für die Inklusion unumkehrbar anmutet, scheint es bisher keine Einigung über den Weg und Zeitrahmen zur Umsetzung zu geben. So liegt der durchschnittliche Anteil der Schüler mit einem sonderpädagogischen Förderbedarf, die in Regelklassen an Regelschulen unterrichtet werden, bei nur 28.2 % (Grundgesamtheit: alle Schüler mit ausgewiesenem Förderbedarf in Deutschland). Hierfür werden Ursachen analysiert und diskutiert. Daneben erscheint als die vorrangige Frage die nach dem Nutzen für die Betroffenen, da die Perspektive der Betroffenen der Maßstab dafür sein sollte, ob Inklusion als gelungen angesehen wird. Diese Frage kann mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit nur bezogen auf einzelne Subgruppen von Behinderten valide beantwortet werden kann. Hier besteht noch erheblicher Forschungsbedarf.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Steinbach ◽  
Heidrun Stoeger

Abstract. We describe the development and validation of an instrument for measuring the affective component of primary school teachers’ attitudes towards self-regulated learning. The questionnaire assesses the affective component towards those cognitive and metacognitive strategies that are especially effective in primary school. In a first study (n = 230), the factor structure was verified via an exploratory factor analysis. A confirmatory factor analysis with data from a second study (n = 400) indicated that the theoretical factor structure is appropriate. A comparison with four alternative models identified the theoretically derived factor structure as the most appropriate. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by correlations with a scale that measures the degree to which teachers create learning environments that enable students to self-regulate their learning. Retrospective validity was demonstrated by correlations with a scale that measures teachers’ experiences with self-regulated learning. In a third study (n = 47), the scale’s concurrent validity was tested with scales measuring teachers’ evaluation of the desirability of different aspects of self-regulated learning in class. Additionally, predictive validity was demonstrated via a binary logistic regression, with teachers attitudes as predictor on their registration for a workshop on self-regulated learning and their willingness to implement a seven-week training program on self-regulated learning.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 852-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Gunnesch-Luca ◽  
Klaus Moser

Abstract. The current paper presents the development and validation of a unit-level Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) scale based on the Referent-Shift Consensus Model (RSCM). In Study 1, with 124 individuals measured twice, both an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) established and confirmed a five-factor solution (helping behavior, sportsmanship, loyalty, civic virtue, and conscientiousness). Test–retest reliabilities at a 2-month interval were high (between .59 and .79 for the subscales, .83 for the total scale). In Study 2, unit-level OCB was analyzed in a sample of 129 work teams. Both Interrater Reliability (IRR) measures and Interrater Agreement (IRA) values provided support for RSCM requirements. Finally, unit-level OCB was associated with group task interdependence and was more predictable (by job satisfaction and integrity of the supervisor) than individual-level OCB in previous research.


2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy V. Mumford ◽  
Chad H. Van Iddekinge ◽  
Frederick P. Morgeson ◽  
Michael A. Campion

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document