Numerical simulation of two-phase non-Newtonian blood flow with fluid-structure interaction in aortic dissection

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 620-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghui Qiao ◽  
Yujie Zeng ◽  
Ying Ding ◽  
Jianren Fan ◽  
Kun Luo ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
J.-H. Jeong ◽  
M. Kim ◽  
P. Hughes

Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) is the interaction of some movable or deformable structure with an internal or surrounding fluid flow. Therefore, fluid-structure interaction problems are too complex to solve analytically and so they have to be analysed by means of experiments or numerical simulation. This paper provides an overview of numerical methods for fluid-structure interaction evaluation in an draft IAEA technical guideline: large eddy simulation (LES), direct numerical simulation (DNS), Lattice-Boltzmann method (LBM), finite element method (FEM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. In addition to providing general applications of numerical methods for fluid-structure interaction evaluation, the paper also describes some cases applied for problems associated with single-phase flow and two-phase flow in nuclear power plants.


Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912199854
Author(s):  
Mohammad Javad Ghasemi Pour ◽  
Kamran Hassani ◽  
Morteza Khayat ◽  
Shahram Etemadi Haghighi

Background and objectives: Fluid structure interaction (FSI) is defined as interaction of the structures with contacting fluids. The aortic valve experiences the interaction with blood flow in systolic phase. In this study, we have tried to predict the hemodynamics of blood flow through a normal and stenotic aortic valve in two relaxation and exercise conditions using a three-dimensional FSI method. Methods: The aorta valve was modeled as a three-dimensional geometry including a normal model and two others with 25% and 50% stenosis. The geometry of the aortic valve was extracted from CT images and the models were generated by MMIMCS software and then they were implemented in ANSYS software. The pulsatile flow rate was used for all cases and the numerical simulations were conducted based on a time-dependent domain. Results: The obtained results including the velocity, pressure, and shear stress contours in different systolic time sequences were explained and discussed. The maximum blood flow velocity in relaxation phase was obtained 1.62 m/s (normal valve), 3.78 m/s (25% stenosed valve), and 4.73 m/s (50% stenosed valve). In exercise condition, the maximum velocities are 2.86, 4.32, and 5.42 m/s respectively. The maximum blood pressure in relaxation phase was calculated 111.45 mmHg (normal), 148.66 mmHg (25% stenosed), and 164.21 mmHg (50% stenosed). However, the calculated values in exercise situation were 129.57, 163.58, and 191.26 mmHg. The validation of the predicted results was also conducted using existing literature. Conclusions: We believe that such model are useful tools for biomechanical experts. The further studies should be done using experimental data and the data are implemented on the boundary conditions for better comparison of the results.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 815945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongjun Zhu ◽  
Hongnan Zhao ◽  
Qian Pan ◽  
Xue Li

A numerical simulation has been conducted to investigate flow erosion and pipe deformation of elbow in gas-solid two-phase flow. The motion of the continuous fluid phase is captured based on calculating three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged-Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, while the kinematics and trajectory of the discrete particles are evaluated by discrete phase model (DPM), and a fluid-structure interaction (FSI) computational model is adopted to calculate the pipe deformation. The effects of inlet velocity, pipe diameter, and the ratio of curvature and diameter on flow feature, erosion rate, and deformation of elbow are analyzed based on a series of numerical simulations. The numerical results show that flow field, erosion rate, and deformation of elbow are all sensitive to the structural changes and inlet condition changes. Higher inlet rate, smaller curvature diameter ratio, or smaller pipe diameter leads to greater deformation, while slower inlet rate, larger curvature diameter ratio, and larger pipe diameter can weaken flow erosion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document