Instructor Misbehavior Frequency, Severity, and Impact on Learning: Comparing Student and Teacher Perceptions

Author(s):  
Jessalyn I. Vallade
1990 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W Jarski ◽  
Kornelia Kulig ◽  
Ronald E Olson

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn Meltzer ◽  
Tamar Katzir-Cohen ◽  
Lynne Miller ◽  
Bethany Roditi

1981 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry J. Fraser

International work involving the measurement and investigation of perceptions of psychosocial characteristics of school classrooms has firmly established classroom learning environment as a thriving field of study. Furthermore Australian educational researchers have made sizable and distinctive contributions to this research effort. This paper provides an overview of overseas work on the development and use of classroom environment instruments, reports normative and validation data from the use of new or modified scales among large Australian samples, and reviews the Australian research in the area. In particular, Australian research has involved predictive validity studies of outcome-environment relationships, use of environment perceptions as criterion variables, investigation of differences between student and teacher perceptions of actual and preferred environment, person-environment fit studies of relationships between student learning and actual-preferred congruence, and practical attempts to facilitate environmental change. Taken together, Australian studies provide much evidence which supports the validity of various classroom environment instruments, which attests to their usefulness as sources of both predictor and criterion variables for a variety of educational research purposes, and which suggests promising new directions for future research.


1999 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Stock McIsaac ◽  
J Michael Blocher ◽  
Veena Mahes ◽  
Charalambos Vrasidas

1986 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen T. Evans ◽  
Millicent E. Poole

This study reports an eclectic evaluation of a language program. The evaluation involved a formative phase (to develop a theoretical framework of language pragmatics, to develop materials and strategies); and a summative phase (a field trial involving pre-post outcome measures, student and teacher perceptions of the program, and the application by an external evaluator of the LoU scale of the measure of adoption of an innovation). The outcomes were consistent with the expectations generated by the theory of language pragmatics and learning-in-context. Important insights were gained into aspects of classroom organization and the level of adoption of program innovations by teachers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document