scholarly journals Word predictability depends on parafoveal preview validity in Chinese reading

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Chang ◽  
Kuo Zhang ◽  
Lisha Hao ◽  
Sainan Zhao ◽  
Victoria A. McGowan ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuanli Zang ◽  
Manman Zhang ◽  
Xuejun Bai ◽  
Guoli Yan ◽  
Bernhard Angele ◽  
...  

How do readers decide whether to skip or fixate a word? Angele and Rayner [2013. Processing the in the parafovea: Are articles skipped automatically? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 649–662] showed that English readers base skipping decisions on the parafoveal information available, but not the sentential context. Due to the increased visual density of the language, Chinese readers may be able to process a parafoveal word and integrate it with the sentence context to a greater extent than English readers. Consequently, influences on skipping decisions in Chinese may differ from those in English. In a boundary paradigm experiment, participants read sentences containing a single-character target verb (e.g., 取 meaning get) whose preview was manipulated in three conditions: identity preview; a preview consisting of the syntactically anomalous high-frequency structural particle de (的), or a pseudocharacter preview. The results showed that Chinese readers were more likely to skip the target when the preview was de than in either of the other conditions, suggesting that de-skipping is triggered by the parafoveal preview of a highly frequent particle word rather than on the likelihood of the upcoming word given the sentential context.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 933
Author(s):  
ZHANG Manman ◽  
ZANG Chuanli ◽  
XU Yufeng ◽  
BAI Xuejun ◽  
YAN Guoli

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 780-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sainan Zhao ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
Min Chang ◽  
Qianqian Xu ◽  
Kuo Zhang ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 67 (11) ◽  
pp. 2172-2188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Cui ◽  
Denis Drieghe ◽  
Xuejun Bai ◽  
Guoli Yan ◽  
Simon P. Liversedge

2020 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 2793-2801
Author(s):  
Min Chang ◽  
Lisha Hao ◽  
Sainan Zhao ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
Kevin B. Paterson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-76
Author(s):  
Sainan Zhao ◽  
Lin Li ◽  
Min Chang ◽  
Jingxin Wang ◽  
Kevin B Paterson

Older adults are thought to compensate for slower lexical processing by making greater use of contextual knowledge, relative to young adults, to predict words in sentences. Accordingly, compared to young adults, older adults should produce larger contextual predictability effects in reading times and skipping rates for words. Empirical support for this account is nevertheless scarce. Perhaps the clearest evidence to date comes from a recent Chinese study showing larger word predictability effects for older adults in reading times but not skipping rates for two-character words. However, one possibility is that the absence of a word-skipping effect in this experiment was due to the older readers skipping words infrequently because of difficulty processing two-character words parafoveally. We therefore took a further look at this issue, using one-character target words to boost word-skipping. Young (18–30  years) and older (65+ years) adults read sentences containing a target word that was either highly predictable or less predictable from the prior sentence context. Our results replicate the finding that older adults produce larger word predictability effects in reading times but not word-skipping, despite high skipping rates. We discuss these findings in relation to ageing effects on reading in different writing systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document