Collegiate athletic trainers’ perceptions of the benefits and drawbacks of interprofessional collaborative practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 654-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Manspeaker ◽  
Dorice A. Hankemeier
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Trainers ◽  
Collaborative Practice ◽  
Interprofessional Collaborative Practice ◽  
Collegiate Athletic Trainers

scholarly journals Challenges to and Resources for Participation in Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Perceptions of Collegiate Athletic Trainers

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-114
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Manspeaker ◽  
Dorice A. Hankemeier
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Athletic Trainers ◽  
Health Care Team ◽  
Collaborative Practice ◽  
College And University ◽  
Interprofessional Collaborative Practice ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Collegiate Athletic Trainers

Context Health care systems are increasing their emphasis on interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) as a necessary component to patient care. However, information regarding the challenges athletic trainers (ATs) perceive with respect to participating in IPCP is lacking. Objective To describe collegiate ATs' perceptions of challenges to and resources for participation in IPCP. Design Qualitative study. Setting College and university. Patients or Other Participants The response rate was 8% (513 ATs [234 men, 278 women, 1 preferred not to disclose sex], years in clinical practice = 10.69 ± 9.33). Data Collection and Analysis Responses to survey-based, open-ended questions were collected through Qualtrics. A general inductive qualitative approach was used to analyze data and establish relevant themes and categories for responses. Multianalyst coding and an external auditor confirmed coding saturation and assisted in triangulation. Results Challenges were reported in the areas of needing a defined IPCP team structure, respect for all involved health care parties, and concerns when continuity of care was compromised. Communication was reported as both a perceived challenge and a resource. Specific resources seen as beneficial to effective participation in IPCP included communication mechanisms such as shared patient health records and educational opportunities with individuals from other health care professions. Conclusions As ATs become more integrated into IPCP, they need to accurately describe and advocate their roles, understand the roles of others, and be open to the dynamic needs of team-based care. Development of continuing interprofessional education opportunities for all relevant members of the health care team can help to delineate roles more effectively and provide more streamlined care with the goal of improving patient outcomes.

Pre- and Post-Activity Stretching Practices of Collegiate Athletic Trainers in the United States

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 2347-2354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer K. Popp ◽  
David M. Bellar ◽  
Donald L. Hoover ◽  
Bruce W. Craig ◽  
Brianna N. Leitzelar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Athletic Trainers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Collegiate Athletic Trainers

scholarly journals The Organizational Climate in Collegiate Athletics: An Athletic Trainer's Perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle ◽  
Christianne M. Eason
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Climate ◽  
Athletic Trainers ◽  
Collegiate Athletics ◽  
Work Life ◽  
Work Life Balance ◽  
Life Balance ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Expert Review ◽  
Data Saturation ◽  
Collegiate Athletic Trainers

Context:  An organizational climate is largely based on an employee's perceptions of the working conditions in which he or she engages regularly. A multifaceted concept, the organizational climate is often formed by perceptions of employee welfare, rewards, and support. Achieving work-life balance is also a part of the climate. Objective:  To learn collegiate athletic trainers' perceptions of organizational climate and specifically how it may pertain to their work-life balance. Design:  Phenomenologic study. Setting:  Collegiate practice setting. Patients or Other Participants:  Thirty athletic trainers working in the collegiate athletics setting took part in 1-on-1 phone interviews. The participants were 30.5 (interquartile range [IQR] = 7.75) years old and had been certified for 7 (IQR = 5) years and at their current position for 4 (IQR = 3) years. Data Collection and Analysis:  Participants completed a phone interview that followed a semistructured framework. All transcribed interviews were analyzed using a phenomenologic approach. Researcher triangulation, expert review, and data saturation were used to establish credibility. Results:  Athletic trainers working in the collegiate athletics setting who had positive perceptions of their work-life balance described their organizational climate as family friendly. Our participants' supervisors allowed for autonomy related to work scheduling, which provided opportunities for work-life balance. These athletic trainers believed that they worked in a climate that was collegial, which was helpful for work-life balance. In addition, the importance of placing family first was part of the climate. Conclusions:  The perceptions of our participants revealed a climate of family friendliness, supervisor support, and collegiality among staff members, which facilitated the positive climate for work-life balance. The mindset embraced the importance of family and recognized that work did not always have to supersede personal priorities.

Interprofessional Collaborative Practice and School Nursing: A Model for Improved Health Outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Fleming ◽  
Mayumi Willgerodt
Keyword(s):  
Case Management ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
School Setting ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
School Nurse ◽  
Collaborative Practice ◽  
Interprofessional Collaborative Practice

Effective communication, teamwork, and interprofessional collaboration, or teams of health and non-health professionals working together, are critical to improving the patient experience of care; improving population health; and reducing healthcare costs (i.e., the Triple Aim). In 2016, the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Expert Panel updated its Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice. As health professionals who collaborate with an extensive network of health and non-health professionals, school nurses embody the aims of interprofessional collaboration (IPC). This article briefly reviews the background of interprofessional collaboration and describes ways that school nurse practice aligns with IPC core competencies to incorporate interprofessional collaboration. We discuss successes, such as case management and care coordination, and include challenges to IPC in the school setting. In conclusion, through case management and collaborative care, school nurse expertise in effective IPC fosters knowledge through which core competencies can be strengthened, with benefits for both patients and other healthcare providers.

scholarly journals What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review

2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra R. Davidson ◽  
Jaimon Kelly ◽  
Lauren Ball ◽  
Mark Morgan ◽  
Dianne P. Reidlinger
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Chronic Condition ◽  
Collaborative Practice ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Patient Role ◽  
Interprofessional Collaborative Practice ◽  
Sharing Space ◽  
Patients Experience

Abstract Background Improving the patient experience is one of the quadruple aims of healthcare. Therefore, understanding patient experiences and perceptions of healthcare interactions is paramount to quality improvement. This integrative review aimed to explore how patients with chronic conditions experience Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in primary care. Methods An integrative review was conducted to comprehensively synthesize primary studies that used qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Databases searched were Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science on June 1st, 2021. Eligible studies were empirical full-text studies in primary care that reported experiences or perceptions of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice by adult patients with a chronic condition, in any language published in any year. Quality appraisal was conducted on included studies using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Data on patients’ experiences and perceptions of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in primary care were extracted, and findings were thematically analyzed through a meta-synthesis. Results Forty-eight (n = 48) studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of n = 3803 participants. Study quality of individual studies was limited by study design, incomplete reporting, and the potential for positive publication bias. Three themes and their sub-themes were developed inductively: (1) Interacting with Healthcare Teams, subthemes: widening the network, connecting with professionals, looking beyond the condition, and overcoming chronic condition collectively; (2) Valuing Convenient Healthcare, subthemes: sharing space and time, care planning creates structure, coordinating care, valuing the general practitioner role, and affording healthcare; (3) Engaging Self-care, subthemes: engaging passively is circumstantial, and, engaging actively and leading care. Conclusions Patients overwhelmingly had positive experiences of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice, signaling it is appropriate for chronic condition management in primary care. The patient role in managing their chronic condition was closely linked to their experience. Future studies should investigate how the patient role impacts the experience of patients, carers, and health professionals in this context. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42020156536.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document