What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review

Background Improving the patient experience is one of the quadruple aims of healthcare. Therefore, understanding patient experiences and perceptions of healthcare interactions is paramount to quality improvement. This integrative review aimed to explore how patients with chronic conditions experience Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in primary care. Methods An integrative review was conducted to comprehensively synthesize primary studies that used qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Databases searched were Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science on June 1st, 2021. Eligible studies were empirical full-text studies in primary care that reported experiences or perceptions of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice by adult patients with a chronic condition, in any language published in any year. Quality appraisal was conducted on included studies using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Data on patients’ experiences and perceptions of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in primary care were extracted, and findings were thematically analyzed through a meta-synthesis. Results Forty-eight (n = 48) studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of n = 3803 participants. Study quality of individual studies was limited by study design, incomplete reporting, and the potential for positive publication bias. Three themes and their sub-themes were developed inductively: (1) Interacting with Healthcare Teams, subthemes: widening the network, connecting with professionals, looking beyond the condition, and overcoming chronic condition collectively; (2) Valuing Convenient Healthcare, subthemes: sharing space and time, care planning creates structure, coordinating care, valuing the general practitioner role, and affording healthcare; (3) Engaging Self-care, subthemes: engaging passively is circumstantial, and, engaging actively and leading care. Conclusions Patients overwhelmingly had positive experiences of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice, signaling it is appropriate for chronic condition management in primary care. The patient role in managing their chronic condition was closely linked to their experience. Future studies should investigate how the patient role impacts the experience of patients, carers, and health professionals in this context. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42020156536.

How Frequently are Caregivers Included in Patient Education for Oncology Patients?

A growing body of literature shows that family and unpaid caregivers of older adults with cancer are assuming more care responsibilities, especially after discharge from an inpatient admission, and frequently report feeling unprepared to do so. Interprofessional collaborative practice can rectify this gap to help ensure caregivers are included in the care team and patient education in the hospital. This retrospective data analysis of electronic health record data examines the prevalence of caregiver involvement in education activities conducted by health care practitioners for older adult cancer inpatients at an academic medical hospital in the midwestern United States. Our dataset includes a total of 676 admissions of older adult cancer inpatients (565 unique patients) between 9/1/2018 and 10/1/2019. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted to determine the prevalence of caregiver involvement in patient educational activities. The average patient was 75 years old (range: 66-89), white(95%) and male (57%). Approximately 5,720 educational topics were discussed with patients, and 88% of admissions included some patient education. Caregivers were included in 29.6% of educational topics discussed and at least one education session for 42.9% of all admissions. Caregivers are important collaborators in supporting the health and well-being of older adults with cancer, but they are often not included in patient educational activities prior to discharge. Practioners may need to evaluate barriers to including caregivers in patient education activities. A better understanding of this gap in education can help inform future interprofessional collaborative practice initiatives.

Health Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in Exclusive Breastfeeding : A scoping review

The World Health Organization reports the low coverage of exclusive breastfeeding. The need for support from all health professionals in an effort to increase the coverage of exclusive breastfeeding is important to conduct collaborative practices of interprofessional health. The purpose of this scoping review is to analyze the health interprofessional collaborative practice in exclusive breastfeeding. This scoping review used the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Search for articles published from 2009 to 2019 from 5 databases (PubMed, Wiley, Sciencedirect, EBSCO, and google scholar). Data were reviewed using the PRISMA flowchart. The results of the review found the role of health professionals and health interprofessional barriers in exclusive breastfeeding.