A Delirium Risk Stratification Tool and Interdisciplinary Rounds to Prevent Delirium in Hospitalized Older Adults

Delirium is a disturbance of attention accompanied by a change in baseline cognition that is commonly seen in acute care settings, and effects up to 80% of ICU patients. The development of delirium has adverse effects on patient outcomes and high health care costs. Of patients aged 65+ admitted to our hospital in 2019, non-delirious patients had a five-day length of stay (LOS) compared to a 10-14 days LOS in delirious patients. A five days LOS increase adds an additional $ 8,325 per patient for an extra annual cost of 15 million dollars. Additionally, delirium is often not recognized. A prior retrospective study showed that 31% of older adults seen by a Geriatrics provider were diagnosed with delirium, while only 11% were detected by nurse’s CAM screen. Given the need to improve delirium detection and management, a QI project was undertaken with a goal to recruit an interdisciplinary team, create a risk stratification tool to identify patients at substantial risk for developing delirium, and develop a delirium prevention protocol. Patients with a score of ≥ 4 were initiated on a nurse driven delirium protocol that included a delirium precaution sign and caregiver education. 6 months data has shown increased delirium detection of 33%, a reduction in 7.7 days LOS, reduced SNF discharge by 27%, and a significant LOS saving of 231 days. The results were statistically significant, p < 0.04 for LOS reduction. The cost avoidance in LOS alone were $384,615 for delirium patients.

Handshake Stewardship: Interdisciplinary Rounds as a Tool to Spread Antimicrobial Stewardship Led by Hospitalist-Pharmacist Teams

Background Over the past decade there has been a greater emphasis on optimizing antimicrobial stewardship. Most stewardship models rely upon a central team, often led by infectious disease doctors and pharmacists to oversee institutional prescribing. We believe there is opportunity to complement this model by incorporating stewardship into interdisciplinary rounds.ObjectiveTo access feasibility and acceptance of antimicrobial stewardship into interdisciplinary rounds.Method We piloted a stewardship model driven by hospitalists and pharmacists through interdisciplinary rounds on four medicine units. We hypothesized that our process would not hamper existing tasks of interdisciplinary rounds. We surveyed team members to understand how the initiative was experienced.ResultsMany clinicians reported that antimicrobial prescribing was ‘often’ or ‘always’ discussed, and the process was ‘not too burdensome’ to incorporate. These responses varied based on the type of provider. A majority of the advanced practice providers (88%) reported the model prompted them to reconsider their individual antimicrobial prescribing. A 28.1% overall reduction of target antibiotic utilization was realized, however, there may be other contributors to this reduction.ConclusionWe believe interdisciplinary rounds can provide a good platform to extend hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship. It was not felt to disrupt the efficiency of achieving other goals of interdisciplinary rounds.

Development of a Standardized Data Collection Tool for Evaluation and Management of Coronavirus Disease 2019

Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 ) is responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a disease that had not been previously described and for which clinicians need to rapidly adapt their daily practice. The novelty of SARS-CoV-2 produced significant gaps in harmonization of definitions, data collection, and outcome reporting to identify patients who would benefit from potential interventions. Methods We describe a multicenter collaboration to develop a comprehensive data collection tool for the evaluation and management of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. The proposed tool was developed by a multidisciplinary working group of infectious disease physicians, intensivists, and infectious diseases/antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists. The working group regularly reviewed literature to select important patient characteristics, diagnostics, and outcomes for inclusion. The data collection tool consisted of spreadsheets developed to collect data from the electronic medical record and track the clinical course after treatments. Results Data collection focused on demographics and exposure epidemiology, prior medical history and medications, signs and symptoms, diagnostic test results, interventions, clinical outcomes, and complications. During the pilot validation phase, there was <10% missing data for most domains and components. Team members noted improved efficiency and decision making by using the tool during interdisciplinary rounds. Conclusions We present the development of a COVID-19 data collection tool and propose its use to effectively assemble harmonized data of hospitalized individuals with COVID-19. This tool can be used by clinicians, researchers, and quality improvement healthcare teams. It has the potential to facilitate interdisciplinary rounds, provide comparisons across different hospitalized populations, and adapt to emerging challenges posed by the pandemic.

Making Room at the Bedside: Improving Communication Alongside Medical Education Through Interdisciplinary Rounds

Interdisciplinary rounding has been shown to improve patient safety and provider engagement. Many models for interdisciplinary rounding have been proposed but few focus on preserving bedside medical education. The authors changed the interdisciplinary bedside rounding model to accommodate more time for medical education. The objective was to assess perceptions of communication, care coordination, and teamwork surrounding this change. Resident and attending physicians and unit-based nursing staff completed an anonymous online survey prior to and following the rounding intervention. Length of stay on medical units also was monitored prior to and following the rounding intervention. Following the intervention, there were perceived improvements in interdisciplinary communication, care coordination, and teamwork, and there were no significant changes in length of stay.