‘We’re asking teachers to do more with less': perspectives on least restrictive environment implementation in physical education

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1058-1071
Author(s):  
Wesley J. Wilson ◽  
Luke E. Kelly ◽  
Justin A. Haegele
1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Butterfield

Decker contends that deaf children should be educated in regular public school classrooms. In response, it is argued that due to their unique social/emotional/cultural needs, some deaf children benefit from residential school placement–particularly in physical education. Use of the term deaf is also discussed.


1995 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Decker ◽  
Paul Jansma

For over 15 years it has been public policy to educate students with disabilities, to the maximum extent possible, in the least restrictive environment (LRE) alongside their peers without disabilities. However, scarce empirical data exist documenting nationwide efforts to comply with the LRE mandate. The purpose of this study was to determine what types of LRE continua are in use in physical education throughout the United States. Subjects were physical education personnel in 452 schools throughout the United States. Data were collected regarding the usage of physical education LRE placement continua across enrollment level, grade range, metro status, and geographic region. Results indicate that while numerous (N = 26) physical education LRE continua were used during the 1988-89 school year, in most cases students with disabilities received physical education in a regular class setting with little or no access to adapted physical education. These results indicate that the utility of traditional physical education LRE placement continua may be suspect.


Quest ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley J. Wilson ◽  
Justin Anthony Haegele ◽  
Luke E. Kelly

1991 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Butterfield

Efforts to include children with disabilities in mainstream settings often raise questions as to what constitutes “least restrictive.” This paper addresses educational placement of deaf children, especially as it pertains to physical education and sport. Many leaders in deaf education hold that placement of deaf children in public schools often occurs without regard to their socioemotional/cultural/language needs. This paper provides a rationale for the residential school as a viable and legitimate placement option for deaf children. Also included in the paper is a brief historical overview of deaf education including the contributions of residential schools to deaf sport and deaf culture.


2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (7) ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren J. Lieberman ◽  
Lauren Cavanaugh ◽  
Justin A. Haegele ◽  
Rocco Aiello ◽  
Wesley J. Wilson

1986 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey D. Broadhead

It may be that important happenings during the 1960s and 1970s have helped to bring about the increased amount of published research in adapted physical education (APE), Three major research thrusts were identified which advanced the APE knowledge base: the evaluation of performance, physical education in the least restrictive environment, and effective programming. Specific suggestions were made for improving the quality of future research, and for the dissemination of research results.


1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Decker

This paper is in response to the article recently publishedin Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly entitled “Physical Education and Sport for the Deaf: Rethinking the Least Restrictive Environment” (Butterfield, 1991). Dr. Butterfield maintained that regular class placement of deaf students is inappropriate whereas such placements lack (a) cultural foundations unique to deaf individuals and essentials for their optimal development and (b) appropriate supportive services vital for the education of such students. In response, the present paper (a) delineates terminology frequently applied to individuals with hearing impairments and (b) maintains that failures of least restrictive environment placement are failures of implementation rather than of conception. Specifically, it is hypothesized taht lack of estabilished supportive services for students with hearing impairments may be traced, in part, to rejection of the least restrictive environment concept by such students and their parents/guardians. This paper contends that individuals with hearing impairments have much more to gain than to lose from increasing ties to the hearing world, particularly in educational settings.


1995 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Potter Chandler ◽  
J. Leon Greene

The purpose of the study was to examine student placements, use of least restrictive environment (LRE) options, teachers’ perceived needs, curriculum content, and activity options in regular physical education (RPE) and adapted physical education (APE) during a period of restructuring from segregated to LRE placements. The Integration Status Questionnaire (ISQ) was used to obtain data with a return rate of 37% among RPE teachers and 78% among APE teachers. Of the 1,627 students receiving APE, 714 were being served in self-contained settings, with no reliable data available as to disability categories of children served or other LRE options being used. The majority of teachers in both groups had received general in-service training for inclusion, but only 4% had received in-service training specific to physical education content. The examination of curriculum content indicated that RPE teachers spent the majority of teaching time on sport skills and traditional games while APE teachers concentrated on sensory motor development and health-related fitness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document