Functioning of medial olivocochlear bundle in right- and left-handed individuals

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-454
Author(s):  
Ramesh Kaipa ◽  
U. Ajith Kumar
2002 ◽  
Vol 77 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 311-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Morand-Villeneuve ◽  
S Garnier ◽  
N Grimault ◽  
E Veuillet ◽  
L Collet ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 277-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Gkoritsa ◽  
Stavros Korres ◽  
Ioannis Segas ◽  
Ioannis Xenelis ◽  
Nikolaos Apostolopoulos ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chava Muchnik ◽  
Daphne Ari-Even Roth ◽  
Rima Othman-Jebara ◽  
Hanna Putter-Katz ◽  
Esther L. Shabtai ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2S) ◽  
pp. 508-515
Author(s):  
L. Yashaswini ◽  
Sandeep Maruthy

Purpose The study aimed to assess the relationship between the level-dependent function of efferent inhibition and speech perception in noise across different intensities of suppressor and across different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of speech. Method Twenty-six young normal-hearing adults participated in the study. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) was measured for 3 levels of suppressor (40, 50, and 60 dB SPL). Speech identification score (SIS) was measured at 5 ipsilateral SNR conditions (quiet, 0, −5, −10, and −15 dB), with and without contralateral broadband noise at 3 levels (40, 50, and 60 dB SPL). Furthermore, SNR-50 was measured with and without the same 3 levels of contralateral broadband noise. Results The results showed that the suppression magnitude of TEOAE increased with an increase in suppressor level. However, neither SIS nor SNR-50 was influenced by the contralateral noise. In addition, SIS and SNR-50 did not show significant correlation with contralateral suppression of TEOAEs. This was true at all the SNRs and contralateral noise levels used in the study. Conclusions The findings suggest that the intensity of noise directly influences medial olivocochlear bundle–mediated efferent inhibition. However, the role of the medial olivocochlear bundle in regulating speech perception in noise needs to be revisited. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9336353


2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
St??phane Maison ◽  
John Durrant ◽  
Cyrille Gallineau ◽  
Christophe Micheyl ◽  
Lionel Collet

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Riga ◽  
Michael Katotomichelakis ◽  
Vasilios Danielides

2007 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Riga ◽  
I. Psarommatis ◽  
S. Korres ◽  
M. Varvutsi ◽  
I. Giotakis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document