scholarly journals ERRATUM TO “RISK ASSESSMENT IN OPEN-OCEAN AQUACULTURE: A FIRM-LEVEL INVESTMENT-PRODUCTION MODEL” [AQUACULTURE ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT 9:369–387]

2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-289
2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Rapp ◽  
W. R. Ramírez ◽  
J. A. Rivera ◽  
M. Carlo ◽  
R. Luciano

Author(s):  
O̸sten Jensen ◽  
Anders Sunde Wroldsen ◽  
Pa˚l Furset Lader ◽  
Arne Fredheim ◽  
Mats Heide ◽  
...  

Aquaculture is the fastest growing food producing sector in the world. Considerable interest exists in developing open ocean aquaculture in response to a shortage of suitable, sheltered inshore locations. The harsh weather conditions experienced offshore lead to a focus on new structure concepts, remote monitoring and a higher degree of automation in order to keep the cost of structures and operations within an economically viable range. This paper proposes tensegrity structures in the design of flexible structures for offshore aquaculture. The finite element analysis program ABAQUS™ has been used to investigate stiffness properties and performance of tensegrity structures when subjected to various forced deformations and hydrodynamic load conditions. The suggested concept, the tensegrity beam, shows promising stiffness properties in tension, compression and bending, which are relevant for development of open ocean aquaculture construction for high energy environments. When designing a tensegrity beam, both pre-stress and spring stiffness should be considered to ensure the desired structural properties. A large strength to mass ratio and promising properties with respect to control of geometry, stiffness and vibration could make tensegrity an enabling technology for future developments.


Aquaculture ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 524 ◽  
pp. 735266
Author(s):  
Tyler Sclodnick ◽  
Steve Sutton ◽  
Thomas Selby ◽  
Robert Dwyer ◽  
Langley Gace

2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 (1) ◽  
pp. 523-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Mearns ◽  
Glen Watabayashi ◽  
Caitlin O'Connor

ABSTRACT A new model is being used to support dispersant Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) workshops. User-driven output includes trajectory maps for both chemically dispersed and undispersed oil, and concentration isopleths reported by depth and over time. To help make toxicological sense of the output, oil concentration isopleths were nominally fixed at concentrations and exposure times of concern developed by consensus during past ERA workshops. Two No. 6 fuel spill scenarios, each with alternative outcomes (not dispersed vs 80% dispersed) were developed, one in open ocean water (10,000 bbls spill), and the other in an estuary (2000 bbls spill). Plume epicenter maximum dispersed oil concentrations peaked in the range of 10–20 ppm but decreased within 24 hours to 1–2 ppm or less. Average concentrations in the most contaminated portions of the dispersion area never exceeded 3 ppm in either scenario. Plankton in a small (< 25%) fraction of the open ocean plume were at moderate risk at 24 hours. These effects must be compared to those of the non-dispersion alternative, which could impact wildlife and shorelines.


2014 ◽  
Vol 88 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.E. Grizzle ◽  
L.G. Ward ◽  
D.W. Fredriksson ◽  
J.D. Irish ◽  
R. Langan ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Fredriksson ◽  
Judson DeCew ◽  
M.Robinson Swift ◽  
Igor Tsukrov ◽  
Michael D. Chambers ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Barbaros Celikkol ◽  
Judson DeCew ◽  
Kenneth Baldwin ◽  
Stanley Boduch ◽  
Michael Chambers ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document