Announcing the Journal of Occupational Science Annual Awards

Keyword(s):  
ergopraxis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (09) ◽  
pp. 38-42
Author(s):  
Sivuyisive Toto
Keyword(s):  

Der südafrikanische Ergotherapeut Sivuyisiwe Toto rief die „Hiking Therapy“ ins Leben, als eine Gruppe von schwarzen Studenten eine seelische Krise erlebte. Sein Artikel über das Wandern als Betätigung ist seine persönliche Reflexion vor dem Hintergrund von Occupational Science. Er zeigt, welcher Zusammenhang zwischen gemeinsamer Betätigung und gemeinsamen Wohlbefinden nach einem traumatischen Ereignis besteht.


ergopraxis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (07/08) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
Florence Kranz
Keyword(s):  

Während wir handeln, können wir in unterschiedlichem Ausmaß präsent, bewusst, engagiert oder erfüllt sein und uns mehr oder weniger wohlfühlen. All diese Aspekte spielen eine Rolle, wenn es um „Mindful Occupation“ geht. Also um die Frage, wie achtsam wir uns betätigen. Der Artikel beschäftigt sich mit dem aktuellen Wissens- und Erkenntnisstand zu diesem Konstrukt und beleuchtet ausgewählte Literatur aus der Occupational Science und Ergotherapie.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (13) ◽  
pp. 337-342
Author(s):  
Mohamad Ghazali Masuri ◽  
Akehsan Dahlan ◽  
Khairil Anuar Md Isa ◽  
Rugayah Hashim

An occupational therapist who involved with driving rehabilitation should use a proper evaluation in identifying safe driving behaviour during the pre-driving assessment. Many reports have stated that human factors contributed up to 97% of collision. This study aims to develop a psychological evaluation that measures human factors in traffic safety during the pre-driving assessment. This study was involved sequential mix methodology approach. The factor analysis was carried out to determine the validity and reliability of the evaluation (Cronbach alpha .887). This assessment found to be adequate in providing the standard means of risky driving attitude based on the cut off value established.Keywords: Occupational science; Pre-driving assessment; Functional activities; Driving rehabilitationeISSN: 2398-4287 © 2020. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v5i13.2060


2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-152
Author(s):  
Antoine L. Bailliard ◽  
Aaron R. Dallman ◽  
Amanda Carroll ◽  
Ben D. Lee ◽  
Susan Szendrey

Background. The Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT) and the American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) state that occupational justice is part of the domain of occupational therapy and that occupational justice is “an aspect of contexts and environments and an outcome of intervention” (AOTA, 2014, p. S9). Key Issues. Despite the increasing focus on justice in the occupational therapy and the occupational science literature, many practitioners in traditional settings do not see its relevance to their everyday practice (Galvin, Wilding, & Whiteford, 2011) or have difficulty envisioning how to enact a justice-informed practice. Purpose. This paper demonstrates how occupational justice is germane to all settings of occupational therapy, and how it can be enacted at micro, meso, and macro levels of occupational therapy practice. Implications. We argue that occupational therapy is a justice-oriented profession at its core and will discuss how occupational justice can be enacted at all levels of practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document