A Word Superiority Effect without Orthographic Assistance

1974 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Henderson

In a binary classification task meaningful but unpronounceable letter strings were compared faster than meaningless strings. This effect obtained when only one member of a pair was meaingful and it increased with number of letters. These results suggest that analysis proceeds in parallel at various levels of the processing hierarchy with interaction between semantic and graphemic processes.

1973 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Baron ◽  
Ian Thurston

2006 ◽  
Vol 1098 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara D. Martin ◽  
Tatjana Nazir ◽  
Guillaume Thierry ◽  
Yves Paulignan ◽  
Jean-François Démonet

Perception ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert T Solman

Two experiments are described in which subjects were required to report the name of a single position-cued ‘critical’ letter in a tachistoscopically displayed string of four letters. The stimulus characters were arranged to form three types of letter strings: (i) strings in which the letters did not form words; (ii) words in which contextual constraint of the critical letters was minimised; and (iii) words in which contextual constraint of the critical letters was maximised. The serial position of the letter to be identified in each string was cued at delays of −500, −100, and +500 ms, in experiment 1 and at delays of −510 and +510 ms in experiment 2, and in both experiments one group of subjects responded to letter strings which subtended a horizontal visual angle of 3·95 deg, while a second group responded to strings which subtended 1·02 deg. Correct identifications of critical letters showed that the presentation of words resulted in superior performance. This ‘word superiority effect’ is consistent with earlier findings implying that it has a perceptual locus. For the stimuli which subtended the large visual angle the word advantage was detrimentally affected only when the position of the critical letter to be identified was cued either 500 or 510 ms prior to the display of the letter string.


1990 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 299 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Peterzell ◽  
Grant P. Sinclair ◽  
Alice F. Healy ◽  
Lyle E. Bourne

1976 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 412-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Carr ◽  
Stephen W. Lehmkuhle ◽  
Brian Kottas ◽  
Eileen C. Astor-Stetson ◽  
Drew Arnold

1978 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean G. Purcell ◽  
Keith E. Stanovich ◽  
Amos Spector

1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Hildebrandt ◽  
David Caplan ◽  
Scott Sokol ◽  
Lisa Torreano

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document