Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits

The availability of transgenic and mutant lines makes the mouse a valuable model for study of the inner ear, and a powerful window into cochlear function can be obtained by recordings from single auditory nerve (AN) fibers. This study provides the first systematic description of spontaneous and sound-evoked discharge properties of AN fibers in mouse, specifically in CBA/CaJ and C57BL/6 strains, both commonly used in auditory research. Response properties of 196 AN fibers from CBA/CaJ and 58 from C57BL/6 were analyzed, including spontaneous rates (SR), tuning curves, rate versus level functions, dynamic range, response adaptation, phase-locking, and the relation between SR and these response properties. The only significant interstrain difference was the elevation of high-frequency thresholds in C57BL/6. In general, mouse AN fibers showed similar responses to other mammals: sharpness of tuning increased with characteristic frequency, which ranged from 2.5 to 70 kHz; SRs ranged from 0 to 120 sp/s, and fibers with low SR (<1 sp/s) had higher thresholds, and wider dynamic ranges than fibers with high SR. Dynamic ranges for mouse high-SR fibers were smaller (<20 dB) than those seen in other mammals. Phase-locking was seen for tone frequencies <4 kHz. Maximum synchronization indices were lower than those in cat but similar to those found in guinea pig.

Download Full-text

Differential Response Properties to Amplitude Modulated Signals in the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus of the Mustache Bat and the Roles of GABAergic Inhibition

Journal of Neurophysiology ◽

10.1152/jn.1997.77.1.324 ◽

1997 ◽

Vol 77 (1) ◽

pp. 324-340 ◽

Cited By ~ 41

Author(s):

Lichuan Yang ◽

George D. Pollak

Keyword(s):

Phase Locking ◽

Modulation Frequency ◽

Tone Burst ◽

Differential Response ◽

Gabaergic Inhibition ◽

Lateral Lemniscus ◽

Response Properties ◽

Dorsal Nucleus ◽

Modulated Signals ◽

Onset Response

Yang, Lichuan and George D. Pollak. Differential response properties to amplitude modulated signals in the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus of the mustache bat and the roles of GABAergic inhibition. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 324–340, 1997. We studied the phase-locking of 89 neurons in the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (DNLL) of the mustache bat to sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) signals and the influence that GABAergic inhibition had on their response properties. Response properties were determined with tone bursts at each neuron's best frequency and then with a series of SAM signals that had modulation frequencies ranging from 50–100 to 800 Hz in 100-Hz steps. DNLL neurons were divided into two principal types: sustained neurons (55%), which responded throughout the duration of the tone burst, and onset neurons (45%), which responded only at the beginning of the tone burst. Sustained and onset neurons responded differently to SAM signals. Sustained neurons responded with phase-locked discharges to modulation frequencies ≤400–800 Hz. In contrast, 70% of the onset neurons phase-locked only to low modulation frequencies of 100–300 Hz, whereas 30% of the onset neurons did not phase-lock to any modulation frequency. Signal intensity differentially affected the phase-locking of sustained and onset neurons. Sustained neurons exhibited tight phase-locking only at low intensities, 10–30 dB above threshold. Onset neurons, in contrast, maintained strong phase-locking even at relatively high intensities. Blocking GABAergic inhibition with bicuculline had different effects on the phase-locking of sustained and onset neurons. In sustained neurons, there was an overall decline in phase-locking at all modulation frequencies. In contrast, 70% of the onset neurons phase-locked to much higher modulation frequencies than they did when inhibition was intact. The other 30% of onset neurons phase-locked to SAM signals, although they fired only with an onset response to the same signals before inhibition was blocked. In both cases, blocking GABAergic inhibition transformed their responses to SAM signals into patterns that were more like those of sustained neurons. We also propose mechanisms that could explain the differential effects of GABAergic inhibition on onset neurons that locked to low modulation frequencies and on onset neurons that did not lock to any SAM signals before inhibition was blocked. The key features of the proposed mechanisms are the absolute latencies and temporal synchrony of the excitatory and inhibitory inputs.

Download Full-text

GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition modulate monaural auditory response properties in the avian superior olivary nucleus

Journal of Neurophysiology ◽

10.1152/jn.01088.2010 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 105 (5) ◽

pp. 2405-2420 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

W. L. Coleman ◽

M. J. Fischl ◽

S. R. Weimann ◽

R. M. Burger

Keyword(s):

Phase Locking ◽

Auditory Brainstem ◽

Inhibitory Input ◽

Auditory Information ◽

Low Frequencies ◽

Response Properties ◽

Glycinergic Inhibition ◽

Olivary Nucleus

The superior olivary nucleus (SON) is the primary source of inhibition in the avian auditory brainstem. While much is known about the role of inhibition at the SON's target nuclei, little is known about how the SON itself processes auditory information or how inhibition modulates these properties. Additionally, the synaptic physiology of inhibitory inputs within the SON has not been described. We investigated these questions using in vivo and in vitro electrophysiological techniques in combination with immunohistochemistry in the chicken, an organism for which the auditory brainstem has otherwise been well characterized. We provide a thorough characterization of monaural response properties in the SON and the influence of inhibitory input in shaping these features. We found that the SON contains a heterogeneous mixture of response patterns to acoustic stimulation and that in most neurons these responses are modulated by both GABAergic and glycinergic inhibitory inputs. Interestingly, many SON neurons tuned to low frequencies have robust phase-locking capability and the precision of this phase locking is enhanced by inhibitory inputs. On the synaptic level, we found that evoked and spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) within the SON are also mediated by both GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition in all neurons tested. Analysis of spontaneous IPSCs suggests that most SON cells receive a mixture of both purely GABAergic terminals, as well as terminals from which GABA and glycine are coreleased. Evidence for glycinergic signaling within the SON is a novel result that has important implications for understanding inhibitory function in the auditory brainstem.

Download Full-text

Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception

10.1101/2020.03.29.014233 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Gavin M. Bidelman ◽

Sara Momtaz

Keyword(s):

Phase Locking ◽

Primary Auditory Cortex ◽

Auditory Pathway ◽

Source Reconstruction ◽

Listening Skills ◽

Frequency Following Response ◽

Speech In Noise ◽

Brain Behavior ◽

The Brain ◽

Robust To Noise

ABSTRACTScalp-recorded frequency-following responses (FFRs) reflect a mixture of phase-locked activity across the auditory pathway. FFRs have been widely used as a neural barometer of complex listening skills, especially speech-in noise (SIN) perception. Applying individually optimized source reconstruction to speech-FFRs recorded via EEG (FFREEG), we assessed the relative contributions of subcortical [auditory nerve (AN), brainstem/midbrain (BS)] and cortical [bilateral primary auditory cortex, PAC] source generators with the aim of identifying which source(s) drive the brain-behavior relation between FFRs and SIN listening skills. We found FFR strength declined precipitously from AN to PAC, consistent with diminishing phase-locking along the ascending auditory neuroaxis. FFRs to the speech fundamental (F0) were robust to noise across sources, but were largest in subcortical sources (BS > AN > PAC). PAC FFRs were only weakly observed above the noise floor and only at the low pitch of speech (F0≈100 Hz). Brain-behavior regressions revealed (i) AN and BS FFRs were sufficient to describe listeners’ QuickSIN scores and (ii) contrary to neuromagnetic (MEG) FFRs, neither left nor right PAC FFREEG predicted SIN performance. Our preliminary findings suggest subcortical sources not only dominate the electrical FFR but also the link between speech-FFRs and SIN processing as observed in previous EEG studies.

Download Full-text

Neurons sensitive to interaural phase disparity in gerbil superior olive: diverse monaural and temporal response properties

Journal of Neurophysiology ◽

10.1152/jn.1995.73.4.1668 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 73 (4) ◽

pp. 1668-1690 ◽

Cited By ~ 127

Author(s):

M. W. Spitzer ◽

M. N. Semple

Keyword(s):

Phase Locking ◽

Dorsal Region ◽

Cell Column ◽

Response Properties ◽

Superior Olive ◽

Binaural Interaction ◽

Medial Dorsal ◽

Interaural Phase ◽

Monaural Stimulation ◽

Stimulation Of

1. We assessed mechanisms of binaural interaction underlying detection of interaural phase disparity (IPD) by recording single-unit responses in the superior olivary complex (SOC) of the anesthetized gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Binaural responses were obtained from 58 IPD-sensitive single units, 44 of which were histologically localized. Monaural responses were also obtained for 52 of 58 IPD-sensitive units. Additionally, responses were recorded from 16 units (best frequency < 2.4 kHz) in lateral SOC that were excited by ipsilateral stimulation and inhibited by contralateral stimulation (EI), none of which was IPD sensitive. Our results are consistent with a mechanism of binaural interaction involving detection of coincident excitatory inputs from the two ears. There was no compelling evidence of binaural sensitivity arising from IPD-dependent interactions of phase-locked excitatory and inhibitory inputs from the two ears. Despite the uniformity of binaural interactions, considerable diversity of temporal and monaural response properties was observed. 2. Monaural and binaural responses of 35 of 58 IPD-sensitive units were phase locked to the period of low-frequency (< 2.5 kHz) tones. Most phase-locking units were bilaterally excitable and, consistent with the coincidence-detection model, their IPD selectivity could be predicted from the difference between the mean phases of the monaural responses. The remaining units (23 of 58) did not phase lock in response to monaural or binaural tones. Most non-phase-locking units failed to respond to monaural stimulation of one or both ears (monaurally unresponsive units). 3. Some IPD-sensitive units were inhibited by monaural stimulation of the ipsilateral ear or both ears. A few units responded only at the onset of monaural and binaural tones. Phase locking was present in responses of some, but not all, of these monaurally inhibited and onset units. 4. Most IPD-sensitive neurons were encountered at sites within or immediately adjacent to the cell column of the medial superior olive (MSO). IPD-sensitive units were also recorded in the lateral superior olive (LSO), in the superior paraolivary nucleus (SPN), and within a region forming a medial-dorsal cap around MSO. Bilaterally excitable unites were concentrated around MSO, but were also encountered in SPN, the medial-dorsal region, and LSO. Some monaurally unresponsive units were recorded in the vicinity of the MSO, but most were located in the medial-dorsal region. Monaurally inhibited units were localized to the medial border of the MSO cell column or to SPN. Onset units were localized to SPN and the medial-dorsal region. EI units were located exclusively in LSO.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Download Full-text