Canopy Growth and Density of Wyoming Big Sagebrush Sown with Cool-Season Perennial Grasses

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann L. Hild ◽  
Gerald E. Schuman ◽  
Laurel E. Vicklund ◽  
Mary I. Williams
2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger L. Sheley ◽  
Jeremy James

AbstractUnderstanding the relative importance of various functional groups in minimizing invasion by medusahead is central to increasing the resistance of native plant communities. The objective of this study was to determine the relative importance of key functional groups within an intact Wyoming big sagebrush–bluebunch wheatgrass community type on minimizing medusahead invasion. Treatments consisted of removal of seven functional groups at each of two sites, one with shrubs and one without shrubs. Removal treatments included (1) everything, (2) shrubs, (3) perennial grasses, (4) taprooted forbs, (5) rhizomatous forbs, (6) annual forbs, and (7) mosses. A control where nothing was removed was also established. Plots were arranged in a randomized complete block with 4 replications (blocks) at each site. Functional groups were removed beginning in the spring of 2004 and maintained monthly throughout each growing season through 2009. Medusahead was seeded at a rate of 2,000 seeds m−2 (186 seeds ft−2) in fall 2005. Removing perennial grasses nearly doubled medusahead density and biomass compared with any other removal treatment. The second highest density and biomass of medusahead occurred from removing rhizomatous forbs (phlox). We found perennial grasses played a relatively more significant role than other species in minimizing invasion by medusahead. We suggest that the most effective basis for establishing medusahead-resistant plant communities is to establish 2 or 3 highly productive grasses that are complementary in niche and that overlap that of the invading species.


2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Ralphs

AbstractBroom snakeweed is one of the most widespread range weeds in western North America. Although a native plant, it increases with disturbance such as overgrazing, fire, and drought, and can dominate sites. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that defoliation of broom snakeweed alone, and along with associated grasses, would reduce its vigor and increase its mortality in bunchgrass plant communities. The study was conducted at two locations: near Nephi, UT in an invaded crested wheatgrass stand and at Howell, UT in a bluebunch wheatgrass/Wyoming big sagebrush community. Clipping treatments consisted of (1) untreated Control; (2) All Clip—clipping all herbaceous vegetation 2 cm above the soil surface, and current season foliar growth of snakeweed; (3) Grass Clip—clipping all grass and forb plants; (4) Snakeweed Clip—clipping current season foliar growth. Treatments were randomly assigned to 1-m2plots and clipped in May or late August. Plots were measured and clipped at the respective seasons annually from 2004 to 2007. Defoliation of snakeweed in spring in the Snakeweed Clip treatment caused higher mortality and lower size and vigor of remaining plants than the other treatments at the end of the study. Clipping all vegetation also reduced snakeweed density at Nephi, but not at Howell. There was little regrowth of bluebunch wheatgrass at Howell in the All Clip treatment; thus, it was likely to have not competed with snakeweed regrowth for limited soil moisture. Bluebunch wheatgrass cover declined at Howell in the All and Grass Clip treatments. Crested wheatgrass was not adversely affected by spring defoliation in the All and Grass Clip treatments, and it increased in the Snakeweed Clip treatment. There were few differences in the fall defoliations. Spring defoliation of snakeweed put it at a competitive disadvantage with both intact perennial bunchgrasses and regrowth crested wheatgrass, thus enhancing its mortality.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Karrfalt ◽  
N. Shaw

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Cox ◽  
L. H. Kosberg ◽  
N. L. Shaw ◽  
S. P. Hardegree

Biomass ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.H. Cherney ◽  
K.D. Johnson ◽  
V.L. Lechtenberg ◽  
J.M. Hertel

Ecosystems ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Schyler A. Reis ◽  
Lisa M. Ellsworth ◽  
J. Boone Kauffman ◽  
David W. Wrobleski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document