gutierrezia sarothrae
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

43
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 112465
Author(s):  
Dale R. Gardner ◽  
Daniel Cook ◽  
Scott W. Larsen ◽  
Clinton A. Stonecipher ◽  
Robert Johnson

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Allen Torell ◽  
Kirk C. McDaniel ◽  
Joel R. Brown ◽  
Gregory L. Torell

2018 ◽  
pp. 21-31
Author(s):  
Brianda Soto-Mata ◽  
Eduardo Alanís Rodríguez ◽  
Enrique Jurado ◽  
Marisela Pando-Moreno ◽  
Víctor Molina-Guerra ◽  
...  

Antecedentes y Objetivos: En México, Amoreuxia wrightii se encuentra en estatus de peligro de extinción de acuerdo a la NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010. En este estudio se realizó la caracterización de poblaciones naturales de A. wrightii, mediante un análisis de la flora asociada y las propiedades físicas y químicas de los suelos donde se desarrollan en dos comunidades contrastadas desde el punto de vista de la cobertura del dosel en el matorral tamaulipeco en el noreste de México.Métodos: En 2014 se establecieron 10 sitios de muestreo en dos ambientes diferenciados por la estructura de la vegetación: cinco sitios en asociaciones vegetales con cobertura vegetal densa y cinco sitios en áreas perturbadas con suelo desnudo. En cada área se evaluó la estructura vegetal y variables edáficas y se realizó un Análisis de Correspondencia Canónica.Resultados clave: De acuerdo a la relación con otras especies, A. wrightii se asoció con especies pioneras, que emergen después de un disturbio, con el dominio de pastos como Aristida purpurea, Cenchrus ciliaris, Cynodon dactylon, Panicum obtusum, especies de herbáceas Gutierrezia sarothrae, Gymnosperma glutinosum y Parthenium hysterophorus, así como arbustos de porte bajo como Acacia amentacea, A. berlandieri y Eysenhardtia texana. De acuerdo con las variables edáficas, se observó que A. wrightii prefiere suelos arcillosos y limosos, con suelos con pH ligeramente alcalinos y con densidad aparente alta. Ningún individuo de A. wrightii fue registrado en sitios que presentaron suelos con altos contenidos de arena y altos contenidos de materia orgánica.Conclusiones: Amoreuxia wrightii fue más abundante en áreas con nula cobertura, desprovistas de vegetación, sobre suelos con bajo contenido de materia orgánica y altos contenidos de pH, limo, arcilla y densidad aparente. De acuerdo a la relación con otras especies, se asoció con especies pioneras, que emergen después de un disturbio.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1934578X1601100
Author(s):  
Qingxi Su ◽  
Seema Dalal ◽  
Michael Goetz ◽  
Maria B. Cassera ◽  
David G. L Kingston

Bioassay guided fractionation of the MeOH extract of the plant Gutierrezia sarothrae (Asteraceae) using an assay for antiplasmodial activity against the drug-resistant Dd2 strain of Plasmodium falciparum led to the isolation of the two new diterpenes 3α-angeloyloxy-15-hydroxylabda-7,13-dien-16,15-olid-18-oic acid (1) and 3α-angeloyloxy-15-methoxylabda-7,13-dien-16,15-olid-18-oic acid (2). The structures of 1 and 2 were elucidated by interpretation of ID and 2D NMR spectroscopic data, mass spectrometry, and comparison with the data of related compounds reported in the literature. Compound 1 exhibited moderate antiplasmodial activity with an IC50 values of 10.4 ± 4.3 μM.


2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Ralphs ◽  
Kirk C. McDaniel

AbstractBroom snakeweed is a native weed widely distributed on rangelands of western North America. It often increases to near monocultures following disturbance from overgrazing, fire, or drought. This paper presents an up-to-date review of broom snakeweed toxicology, seed ecology, population cycles, succession, and management. The greatest ecological concern is that broom snakeweed displaces desirable forage for livestock or wildlife and greatly reduces biodiversity. It also is toxic and can cause abortions in all species of livestock. Propagation usually is pulse-driven in wet years, allowing large expanses of even-aged stands to establish and dominate plant communities. Snakeweed can be controlled by prescribed burning or spraying with herbicides. A weed-resistant plant community dominated by competitive grasses can prevent or minimize its reinvasion.


2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Thacker ◽  
Michael H. Ralphs ◽  
Thomas A. Monaco

AbstractBroom snakeweed (snakeweed) is an aggressive native range-weed found throughout arid and semiarid areas of the western United States, that increases following disturbances such as overgrazing, drought, or wildfire. Ecologically based strategies that include controlling snakeweed and reestablishing desirable herbaceous species are needed to restore productivity and diversity to invaded areas. The objective of this study was to compare the ability of selected introduced and native grass species and prostrate kochia (kochia) to prevent reinvasion of snakeweed, downy brome, and annual forbs following control. This field study was replicated at two sites (Howell and Nephi, Utah) within the sagebrush-steppe biome. Snakeweed and downy brome were controlled by picloram (0.25 kg/ha [0.22 lb/ac]) and glyphosate (1.5 kg/ha [1.3 lb/ac]). The seeding treatments were comprised of three introduced grasses and a mix of these species, three native grasses and a mix of these species, and kochia. The treatments were seeded into 3 by 15-m (10 by 50 ft) plots in October 2003. Frequency and biomass of seeded species, snakeweed, downy brome, other grasses, and annual forbs were measured in 2004, 2005, and 2008. Seeded species were evaluated for success of establishment and persistence, and their ability to restrict reinvasion of snakeweed, downy brome, and annual forbs. Crested wheatgrass and big squirreltail had the best initial establishment at both locations (> 75%). In contrast, kochia and Russian wildrye did not establish well at either site, and western wheatgrass did not establish well at Nephi. Snakeweed reestablishment was restricted in all treatments except the kochia treatments, in which kochia did not establish well. Frequency of downy brome increased at both sites, and annual forb frequency increased at Nephi to near 100%, but the better established grasses suppressed biomass production of these weedy species. Crested wheatgrass established best, had the greatest production, and provided greatest suppression of downy brome and annual weeds.


2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Thacker ◽  
Michael H. Ralphs ◽  
Thomas A. Monaco

AbstractBroom snakeweed (snakeweed) is a native range shrub found throughout semiarid rangelands of the western United States, which increases and dominates plant communities after disturbances such as overgrazing, drought, or wildfire. The objective of this study was to compare the ability of selected grass species and prostrate kochia to restrict establishment and growth of snakeweed seedlings in potted-plant and replicated field studies within two sagebrush ecological sites. In the potted-plant studies, single snakeweed seedlings were grown with seedlings (seedling neighbor study) and established plants (established neighbor study) of three cool-season grasses (crested, pubescent, and bluebunch wheatgrass), prostrate kochia, and snakeweed at increasing densities (1, 3, 5 plants/pot). Interference from crested wheatgrass in the seedling neighbor study, and both crested and bluebunch wheatgrass in the established neighbor study, induced the greatest mortality of snakeweed seedlings, and snakeweed growth was suppressed more by interspecific (grass) than intraspecific (snakeweed) neighbors in both potted-plant studies. Snakeweed establishment was also evaluated at two field sites: Howell and Nephi, UT. Snakeweed and downy brome were controlled by picloram (0.25 kg ae/ha) and glyphosate (1.5 kg ae/ha), then three native and three introduced grasses were drill-seeded, and prostrate kochia was dribble-seeded in replicated plots (3 m by 15 m) at both sites in October 2003. Snakeweed seedlings were transplanted into seeded plots and a bare ground control plot in autumn 2004. Snakeweed mortality was greatest (73%) in crested wheatgrass plots at Howell, but there were few differences among species treatments at Nephi. Of the snakeweed seedlings that survived, there was relatively little growth in any of the seeded plots compared to those in the bare ground control plots. These results indicate that seeded cool-season grasses interfered with and reduced establishment of snakeweed seedlings.


2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Ralphs

AbstractBroom snakeweed is one of the most widespread range weeds in western North America. Although a native plant, it increases with disturbance such as overgrazing, fire, and drought, and can dominate sites. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that defoliation of broom snakeweed alone, and along with associated grasses, would reduce its vigor and increase its mortality in bunchgrass plant communities. The study was conducted at two locations: near Nephi, UT in an invaded crested wheatgrass stand and at Howell, UT in a bluebunch wheatgrass/Wyoming big sagebrush community. Clipping treatments consisted of (1) untreated Control; (2) All Clip—clipping all herbaceous vegetation 2 cm above the soil surface, and current season foliar growth of snakeweed; (3) Grass Clip—clipping all grass and forb plants; (4) Snakeweed Clip—clipping current season foliar growth. Treatments were randomly assigned to 1-m2plots and clipped in May or late August. Plots were measured and clipped at the respective seasons annually from 2004 to 2007. Defoliation of snakeweed in spring in the Snakeweed Clip treatment caused higher mortality and lower size and vigor of remaining plants than the other treatments at the end of the study. Clipping all vegetation also reduced snakeweed density at Nephi, but not at Howell. There was little regrowth of bluebunch wheatgrass at Howell in the All Clip treatment; thus, it was likely to have not competed with snakeweed regrowth for limited soil moisture. Bluebunch wheatgrass cover declined at Howell in the All and Grass Clip treatments. Crested wheatgrass was not adversely affected by spring defoliation in the All and Grass Clip treatments, and it increased in the Snakeweed Clip treatment. There were few differences in the fall defoliations. Spring defoliation of snakeweed put it at a competitive disadvantage with both intact perennial bunchgrasses and regrowth crested wheatgrass, thus enhancing its mortality.


2008 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric T. Thacker ◽  
Michael H. Ralphs ◽  
Christopher A. Call ◽  
Brock Benson ◽  
Shane Green

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document