Market-based and Authorizer-based Accountability Demands and the Implications for Charter School Leadership

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark H. Blitz
2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boyd Dressler

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 12-24
Author(s):  
Madeline Mavrogordato ◽  
Chris Torres

Against the backdrop of the debate around exclusionary discipline practices, this case study asks readers to consider how leaders must balance autonomy with concerns about accountability and equity. In this case, a traditional public school principal in search of more autonomy accepts a principalship at a charter school, but as she attempts to change the school’s approach to student discipline, she discovers she may not have as much autonomy as she anticipated. This case can be used to help students unpack issues of autonomy for school leaders and grapple with the controversy surrounding exclusionary discipline.


2017 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 63-69
Author(s):  
Chester E. Finn ◽  
Bruno V. Manno ◽  
Brandon L. Wright

With 25 years of experience, the charter sector has had enough time to experience a host of unanticipated and unresolved problems related to the complex ways in which charter school governance relates to school leadership. The time has come for the sector to revisit some fundamental decisions about how charter schools and networks are governed, both to tighten arrangements that are excessively loose and to encourage further innovation. The future of chartering should not be a linear extension of the past. If we left some problems unsolved in 1991 (or had no idea that they would become problems), that is no reason not to take stock of things as they stand today and to set matters right before moving forward. This article is based on the authors’ book, Charter Schools at the Crossroads: Predicaments, Paradoxes, Possibilities (Harvard Education Press, 2016).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document