How do we process novel conceptual combinations in context?

2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 807-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica L. Middleton ◽  
Katherine A. Rawson ◽  
Edward J. Wisniewski
1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yevgeniya Goldvarg ◽  
Sam Glucksberg

1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Springer ◽  
Gregory L. Murphy

Three experiments investigated the interpretation of conceptual combinations such as peeled apples. These experiments focused on verification of combination properties. Some properties (e.g., “round” for peeled apples) were verifiable by virtue of the noun alone, whereas others (e.g., “white” for peeled apples) required the combination of adjective and noun and generation of a new property not associated with either. Surprisingly, combination properties were verified more easily than noun properties, even under conditions of extremely rapid presentation. This finding contradicts a simple compositional model of combination in which components are analyzed prior to interpretation of the overall combination meaning. The implications for models of conceptual combination are discussed.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc N Coutanche ◽  
Sarah Solomon ◽  
Sharon L. Thompson-Schill

Much has been learned about how individual concepts and semantic dimensions are represented in the human brain using methods from the field of cognitive neuroscience; however, the process of conceptual combination, in which a new concept is created from pre-existing concepts, has received far less attention. We discuss theories and findings from cognitive science and cognitive neuroscience that shed light on the processing stages and neural systems that allow humans to form new conceptual combinations. We review systematic and creative applications of cognitive neuroscience methods, including neuroimaging, neuropsychological patients, neurostimulation and behavioral studies that have yielded fascinating insights into the cognitive nature and neural underpinnings of conceptual combination. Studies have revealed important features of the cognitive processes that are central to successful conceptual combination. Furthermore, we are beginning to understand how regions of the semantic system, such as the anterior temporal lobe and angular gyrus, integrate features and concepts, and evaluate the plausibility of potential resulting combinations, bridging work in linguistics and semantic memory. Despite the relative newness of these questions for cognitive neuroscience, the investigations we review give a very strong foundation for ongoing and future work that seeks to fully understand how the human brain can flexibly integrate existing concepts to form new and never-before experienced combinations at will.


1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Hampson

Research is described that examines the kinds of impressions formed from congruent and incongruent combinations of trait‐descriptive adjectives. Impressions formed from congruent traits are easier to imagine than impressions formed from incongruent traits. Descriptions of targets specified by congruent traits are more likely to be integrated (i.e. to relate one trait to the other), whereas descriptions of targets specified by incongruent traits are more likely to be aggregated (i.e. to retain both traits but fail to relate them). Using an approach from cognitive psychology for the study of conceptual combinations, the inheritance of attributes by trait combinations was examined. More congruent combinations than incongruent ones exhibited a pattern of complete attribute inheritance, in which behaviors rated as likely for at least one of the constituents were also rated as likely for the combination. These findings illuminate the dificulties in reconciling incongruent trait combinations. Incongruent combinations are less likely to generate impressions in which the two traits can be related, and consequently may result in representations that fail to incorporate all the attributes of each constituent.


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas W. Kohn ◽  
Paul B. Paulus ◽  
Runa M. Korde

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nira Mashal ◽  
Shoshana Coblentz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document