scholarly journals Ageing and Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory: The Role of Presentation Time

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 654-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Rhodes ◽  
Mario A. Parra ◽  
Robert H. Logie
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 933-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Forsberg ◽  
Wendy Johnson ◽  
Robert H. Logie

2020 ◽  
pp. 174702182096071
Author(s):  
Richard J Allen ◽  
Amy L Atkinson ◽  
Louise A Brown Nicholls

Visual working memory for features and bindings is susceptible to age-related decline. Two experiments were used to examine whether older adults are able to strategically prioritise more valuable information in working memory and whether this could reduce age-related impairments. Younger (18–33 years) and older (60–90 years) adults were presented with coloured shapes and, following a brief delay, asked to recall the feature that had accompanied the probe item. In Experiment 1, participants were either asked to prioritise a more valuable object in the array (serial position 1, 2, or 3) or to treat them all equally. Older adults exhibited worse overall memory performance but were as able as younger adults to prioritise objects. In both groups, this ability was particularly apparent at the middle serial position. Experiment 2 then explored whether younger and older adults’ prioritisation is affected by presentation time. Replicating Experiment 1, older adults were able to prioritise the more valuable object in working memory, showing equivalent benefits and costs as younger adults. However, processing speed, as indexed by presentation time, was shown not to limit strategic prioritisation in either age group. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that, although older adults have poorer visual working memory overall, the ability to strategically direct attention to more valuable items in working memory is preserved across ageing.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Schneegans ◽  
Jessica McMaster ◽  
Paul Bays

Previous research on feature binding in visual working memory has supported a privileged role for location in binding an object's non-spatial features. However, humans are able to correctly recall feature conjunctions of objects that occupy the same location at different times. In a series of behavioral experiments, we investigated binding errors under these conditions, and specifically tested whether ordinal position can take the role of location in mediating feature binding. We performed two dual-report experiments in which participants had to memorize three colored shapes presented sequentially at the screen center. When participants were cued with the ordinal position of one item and had to report its shape and color, report errors for the two features were largely uncorrelated. In contrast, when participants were cued e.g. with an item's shape and reported an incorrect ordinal position, they had a high chance of making a corresponding error in the color report. This pattern of error correlations closely matched the predictions of a model in which color and shape are bound to each other only indirectly via an item's ordinal position. In a third experiment, we directly compared the roles of location and sequential position in feature binding. Participants viewed a sequence of colored disks displayed at different locations, and were cued either by a disk's location or its ordinal position to report its remaining properties. The pattern of errors supported a mixed strategy with individual variation, suggesting that binding via either time or space could be used for this task.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document