scholarly journals Complete response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment with nivolumab

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e1663108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianwei Zhang ◽  
Jian Cai ◽  
Yanhong Deng ◽  
Hui Wang
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

A multicenter phase Ib/II study of DNA-PK inhibitor peposertib (M3814) in combination with capecitabine and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS144-TPS144
Author(s):  
Paul Bernard Romesser ◽  
Emma B. Holliday ◽  
Tony Philip ◽  
Rocio Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Rectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ib

TPS144 Background: Perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision, is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, 1/3 of these patients still develop distant metastases, indicating the need for more effective therapies. In addition, strategies that increase pathological complete response rates are needed to enable non-surgical management of LARC. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) regulates a key DNA damage repair pathway for double-strand break repair. Peposertib (M3814), a potent, selective, orally administered DNA-PK inhibitor, has been shown to potentiate the effect of ionizing radiation in a human colon cancer xenograft model and several colon cancer cell lines. Peposertib is being investigated in several different trials across multiple indications. This Phase Ib/II study (NCT03770689) aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of the neoadjuvant treatment combination of peposertib, capecitabine, and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with LARC. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed and resectable Stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma are eligible. Induction chemotherapy is permitted, but residual disease must first be documented by MRI, digital rectal examination and endoscopy. Patients who received other anticancer therapies or those with prior pelvic RT are excluded. At open-label Phase Ib (open), 18–30 patients (n = 3 per cohort) will receive peposertib + capecitabine (orally, 825 mg/m2 twice daily [BID]) + RT (45–50.4 Gy), 5 days/week. Peposertib 50 mg once daily (QD) was the starting dose. Additional dose levels will range between 100─800 mg QD. Dose escalation is determined by the safety monitoring committee and guided by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model. At Phase II (planned), 150 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive oral capecitabine (825 mg/m2 BID) + RT (45–50 Gy), with either oral peposertib (recommended phase II dose [RP2D] or placebo, QD for 5 days/week. Primary objectives are to define a maximum tolerated dose and RP2D (Phase Ib), and to evaluate the efficacy of peposertib + capecitabine + RT in terms of pathological/clinical complete response (Phase II). Secondary objectives include assessment of antitumor activity (Phase Ib), quality of life outcomes (Phase II), and PK of peposertib, and the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy (both phases). To date, one patient has received peposertib 50 mg QD, six patients peposertib 100 mg QD, three patients peposertib 150 mg QD, and three patients peposertib 250 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT03770689.

scholarly journals Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 4319-4336 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hoendervangers ◽  
J. P. M. Burbach ◽  
M. M. Lacle ◽  
M. Koopman ◽  
W. M. U. van Grevenstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Abstract Background Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with better survival, less local recurrence, and less distant failure. Furthermore, pCR indicates that the rectum may have been preserved. This meta-analysis gives an overview of available neoadjuvant treatment strategies for LARC and analyzes how these perform in achieving pCR as compared with the standard of care. Methods Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central bibliographic databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials in which patients received neoadjuvant treatment for MRI-staged nonmetastatic resectable LARC were included. The primary outcome was pCR, defined as ypT0N0. A meta-analysis of studies comparing an intervention with standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation (CRT) was performed. Results Of the 17 articles included in the systematic review, 11 were used for the meta-analysis. Addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based CRT resulted in significantly more pCR compared with fluoropyrimidine-based CRT only (OR 1.46), but at the expense of more ≥ grade 3 toxicity. Other treatment strategies, including consolidation/induction chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), did not improve pCR rates. None of the included trials reported a benefit in local control or OS. Five-year DFS was significantly worse after SCRT-delay compared with CRT (59% vs. 75.1%, HR 1.93). Conclusions All included trials fail to deliver high-level evidence to show an improvement in pCR compared with standard fluoropyrimidine-based CRT. The addition of oxaliplatin might result in more pCR but at the expense of more toxicity. Furthermore, this benefit does not translate into less local recurrence or improved survival.

Deferral of rectal surgery following a continued response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (Watch and Wait) study: A phase II multicenter study in the United Kingdom.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 489-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Yu ◽  
G. Brown ◽  
R. J. Heald ◽  
S. Chua ◽  
G. Cook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Pet Ct

489 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgical resection are standard components of therapy for patients locally advanced rectal cancer (T3,T4 or N+) in UK. In 15%-30% of patients treated pre-operatively with CRT will develop pathological complete response (CR). The time from completion of CRT to maximal tumour response is as yet unknown. This study is the first prospective study to attempt to identify the percentage of patients who can safely omit surgery and the safety of deferred surgery in patients who achieve clinical complete response post CRT. Of the 59 patients required for the study, this provides an update on 19 patients entered. Methods: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer requiring neoadjuvant treatment are identified in the multidisciplinary meet (MDT). Patients undergo CRT using a minimum of 50.4Gy in 28 # daily conformal CT planned CRT with concomitant Capecitabine at 825mg/m2 BD. MRI pelvis and body CT are repeated 4 weeks post CRT and rediscussed at MDT. If there is a good partial response or CR, patients are considered for Deferral of Surgery Study. Based on the pre treatment clinical staging, patients are considered for adjuvant chemotherapy as per NICE guidance. At any point of the study, if there is histology proven tumour regrowth or progression, patient undergo surgery. Results: 10 (53%) patients remain in CR. 6 (32%) patients underwent surgical resection with clear margin after detection of tumour regrowth at from 2-23 months post CRT. 5 out of 6 of the patients with tumour regrowth underwent PET CT as per protocol, and all tumour regrowth in those 5 patients were detected by PET CT, i.e. FDG avid disease. The pathological stages on these 6 patients were ypT2N0 CRM negative in 5 and ypT3N0 CRM negative in 1. 3 (15%) patients with tumour regrowth refused surgery. Conclusions: In the 19 recruited patients, all the patients with tumour regrowth underwent surgical resection with clear margins. PET CT appears a useful tool for detecting tumour regrowth. The median time for tumour regrowth is 17.5 months post CRT. The trial will be successful if at least 11/59 patients are able to safely omit surgery. Accrual of patients continues. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Adding Three Cycles of CAPOX after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Increases the Rates of Complete Response for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 283-293
Author(s):  
Zhiwei Zhai ◽  
Kunning Zhang ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
Tian Zhang ◽  
Lixia Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Consolidation Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference

Background and Objectives: the total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (TNT) includes different strategies, but the most appropriate model remains uncertain. The purpose of this retrospectively study was to evaluate the safety and pathological response in the consolidation chemotherapy model. Methods: patients with cT3/T4 or TxN + M0 rectal cancer that were receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (50 Gy with oral capecitabine)/TNT (CRT followed by three cycles of CAPOX) during September 2017 to September 2019 in our department were included. All of the patients were recommended to receive radical surgery. Results: a total of 197 patients were included. Eighty-one patients received CRT, while one hundred and sixteen patients received TNT. Nine patients did not undergo surgery because of the distant metastases (one patient (1.2%) in CRT group, two patients (1.7%) in TNT group) or a refusal of resection (two patients in CRT group, four patients in TNT group). The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 32.7% in TNT compared with 12.8% in CRT (p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in grade 3 acute toxicities of neoadjuvant treatment and surgical complications between the two groups. Conclusions: the consolidation chemotherapy model is safe for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and it has a high pCR rate. The long-term follow-up is necessary to be evaluated in a future prospective, randomized trial.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant treatment (FOLFOX4 plus hypofractionated tomotherapy) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter phase II trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592097713
Author(s):  
Alessandro Passardi ◽  
Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli ◽  
Emanuela Scarpi ◽  
Elisa Neri ◽  
Elisabetta Parisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Registration Date

Aims: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new neoadjuvant regimen (FOLFOX4 plus hypofractionated tomotherapy) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: Patients with stage II–III rectal cancer were treated with the pre-operative chemoradiotherapy regimen comprising FOLFOX4 (two cycles), TomoTherapy (25 Gy in five consecutive fractions, one fraction per day in 5 days on the clinical target volume at the isodose of 95% of the total dose), FOLFOX4 (two cycles), followed by surgery with total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 (eight cycles). The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR). Results: Fifty-two patients were enrolled and 50 patients were evaluable. A total of 46 (92%) patients completed chemoradiotherapy according to the study protocol and 49 patients underwent surgery. Overall, 12 patients achieved a pCR (24.5%, 95% CI 12.5–36.5). The most common grade 3 or more adverse events were neutropenia and alteration of the alvus. Adverse reactions due to radiotherapy, mainly grade 1–2 dermatitis, tenesmus, urinary dysfunction and pain, were tolerable and fully reversible. The most important surgical complications included infection, anastomotic leakage and fistula, all resolved with conservative treatment. Conclusion: FOLFOX and hypofractionated TomoTherapy is effective and safe in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Long-term efficacy needs to be further evaluated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02000050 (registration date: 26 November 2013) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02000050

scholarly journals Nomogram for predicting pathological complete response and tumor downstaging in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer on the basis of a randomized clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-241
Author(s):  
Jian-Wei Zhang ◽  
Yue Cai ◽  
Xiao-Yu Xie ◽  
Hua-Bin Hu ◽  
Jia-Yu Ling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Circumferential Extent ◽  
Tumor Downstaging

Abstract Background Preoperative fluoropyrimidine with radiotherapy was regarded as the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The model for predicting pCR in LARC patients was based on standard treatment only. This study aimed to establish a nomogram with pretherapeutic parameters and different neoadjuvant regimens for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) and tumor downstaging or good response (ypT0-2N0M0) after receiving neoadjuvant treatment in patients with LARC based on a randomized clinical trial. Methods Between January 2011 and February 2015, 309 patients with rectal cancer were enrolled from a prospective randomized study (NCT01211210). All pretreatment clinical parameters were collected to build a nomogram for predicting pCR and tumor downstaging. The model was subjected to bootstrap internal validation. The predictive performance of the model was assessed with concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. Results Of the 309 patients, 53 (17.2%) achieved pCR and 132 (42.7%) patients were classified as tumor downstaging with ypT0-2N0M0. Based on the logistic-regression analysis and clinical consideration, tumor length (P = 0.005), tumor circumferential extent (P = 0.036), distance from the anal verge (P = 0.019), and neoadjuvant treatment regimen (P < 0.001) showed independent association with pCR following neoadjuvant treatment. The tumor length (P = 0.015), tumor circumferential extent (P = 0.001), distance from the anal verge (P = 0.032), clinical T category (P = 0.012), and neoadjuvant treatment regimen (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with good tumor downstaging (ypT0-2N0M0). Nomograms were developed to predict the probability of pCR and tumor downstaging with a C-index of 0.802 (95% confidential interval [CI], 0.736–0.867) and 0.730 (95% CI, 0.672–0.784). Internal validation revealed good performance of the calibration plots. Conclusions The nomogram provided individual prediction responses to different preoperative treatment for patients with rectal cancer. This model might help physicians in selecting an optimized treatment, but warrants further external validation.

scholarly journals Total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (consolidation chemotherapy during the interval after chemoradiotherapy) for distal rectal cancer increases the rates of complete response

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiwei Zhai ◽  
Kunning Zhang ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
Jiagang Han ◽  
Tian Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Consolidation Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objective To compare the safety and efficacy between neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (TNT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods Patients with cT3/T4 or TxN+M0 rectal cancer were randomized to receive CRT/TNT. In CRT group, we planned pelvic radiotherapy (50.0Gy in 25 fractions) with two cycles of concurrent CAPOX followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). In TNT group, 3 cycles of CAPOX were administered 2 weeks after the completion of CRT before TME. The primary endpoints of my study were pathological complete response (pCR) rates in the two cohorts. Results A total of 197 patients were included in our study. Eighty-one patients received CRT while one hundred and sixteen patients received TNT (consolidation chemotherapy). Nine patients did not undergo surgery because of the distant metastases (1 patient (1.2%) in CRT group, 2 patients (1.7%) in TNT group) or clinical complete response (cCR) (2 patients in CRT group, 4 patients in TNT group). The rate of pathological complete response in TNT was significantly higher than the rate in CRT (32.7% vs12.8%, P =0.002). No grade 4 or serious adverse events were observed. There was no statistically significant difference in the grade 3 acute toxicities of neoadjuvant treatment and surgical complications between the two groups (all P >0.05). Conclusions Our data suggests that total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (consolidation chemotherapy) is effective and safe for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and is associated with high rates of pathological complete response. The long-term follow-up and survival outcomes for patients are necessary to be evaluated in future prospective randomized trial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document