scholarly journals Neoadjuvant treatment (FOLFOX4 plus hypofractionated tomotherapy) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter phase II trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592097713
Author(s):  
Alessandro Passardi ◽  
Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli ◽  
Emanuela Scarpi ◽  
Elisa Neri ◽  
Elisabetta Parisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Registration Date

Aims: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new neoadjuvant regimen (FOLFOX4 plus hypofractionated tomotherapy) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: Patients with stage II–III rectal cancer were treated with the pre-operative chemoradiotherapy regimen comprising FOLFOX4 (two cycles), TomoTherapy (25 Gy in five consecutive fractions, one fraction per day in 5 days on the clinical target volume at the isodose of 95% of the total dose), FOLFOX4 (two cycles), followed by surgery with total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 (eight cycles). The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR). Results: Fifty-two patients were enrolled and 50 patients were evaluable. A total of 46 (92%) patients completed chemoradiotherapy according to the study protocol and 49 patients underwent surgery. Overall, 12 patients achieved a pCR (24.5%, 95% CI 12.5–36.5). The most common grade 3 or more adverse events were neutropenia and alteration of the alvus. Adverse reactions due to radiotherapy, mainly grade 1–2 dermatitis, tenesmus, urinary dysfunction and pain, were tolerable and fully reversible. The most important surgical complications included infection, anastomotic leakage and fistula, all resolved with conservative treatment. Conclusion: FOLFOX and hypofractionated TomoTherapy is effective and safe in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Long-term efficacy needs to be further evaluated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02000050 (registration date: 26 November 2013) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02000050

A multicenter phase Ib/II study of DNA-PK inhibitor peposertib (M3814) in combination with capecitabine and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS144-TPS144
Author(s):  
Paul Bernard Romesser ◽  
Emma B. Holliday ◽  
Tony Philip ◽  
Rocio Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Rectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ib

TPS144 Background: Perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision, is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, 1/3 of these patients still develop distant metastases, indicating the need for more effective therapies. In addition, strategies that increase pathological complete response rates are needed to enable non-surgical management of LARC. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) regulates a key DNA damage repair pathway for double-strand break repair. Peposertib (M3814), a potent, selective, orally administered DNA-PK inhibitor, has been shown to potentiate the effect of ionizing radiation in a human colon cancer xenograft model and several colon cancer cell lines. Peposertib is being investigated in several different trials across multiple indications. This Phase Ib/II study (NCT03770689) aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of the neoadjuvant treatment combination of peposertib, capecitabine, and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with LARC. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed and resectable Stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma are eligible. Induction chemotherapy is permitted, but residual disease must first be documented by MRI, digital rectal examination and endoscopy. Patients who received other anticancer therapies or those with prior pelvic RT are excluded. At open-label Phase Ib (open), 18–30 patients (n = 3 per cohort) will receive peposertib + capecitabine (orally, 825 mg/m2 twice daily [BID]) + RT (45–50.4 Gy), 5 days/week. Peposertib 50 mg once daily (QD) was the starting dose. Additional dose levels will range between 100─800 mg QD. Dose escalation is determined by the safety monitoring committee and guided by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model. At Phase II (planned), 150 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive oral capecitabine (825 mg/m2 BID) + RT (45–50 Gy), with either oral peposertib (recommended phase II dose [RP2D] or placebo, QD for 5 days/week. Primary objectives are to define a maximum tolerated dose and RP2D (Phase Ib), and to evaluate the efficacy of peposertib + capecitabine + RT in terms of pathological/clinical complete response (Phase II). Secondary objectives include assessment of antitumor activity (Phase Ib), quality of life outcomes (Phase II), and PK of peposertib, and the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy (both phases). To date, one patient has received peposertib 50 mg QD, six patients peposertib 100 mg QD, three patients peposertib 150 mg QD, and three patients peposertib 250 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT03770689.

scholarly journals Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 4319-4336 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hoendervangers ◽  
J. P. M. Burbach ◽  
M. M. Lacle ◽  
M. Koopman ◽  
W. M. U. van Grevenstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Abstract Background Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with better survival, less local recurrence, and less distant failure. Furthermore, pCR indicates that the rectum may have been preserved. This meta-analysis gives an overview of available neoadjuvant treatment strategies for LARC and analyzes how these perform in achieving pCR as compared with the standard of care. Methods Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central bibliographic databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials in which patients received neoadjuvant treatment for MRI-staged nonmetastatic resectable LARC were included. The primary outcome was pCR, defined as ypT0N0. A meta-analysis of studies comparing an intervention with standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation (CRT) was performed. Results Of the 17 articles included in the systematic review, 11 were used for the meta-analysis. Addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based CRT resulted in significantly more pCR compared with fluoropyrimidine-based CRT only (OR 1.46), but at the expense of more ≥ grade 3 toxicity. Other treatment strategies, including consolidation/induction chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), did not improve pCR rates. None of the included trials reported a benefit in local control or OS. Five-year DFS was significantly worse after SCRT-delay compared with CRT (59% vs. 75.1%, HR 1.93). Conclusions All included trials fail to deliver high-level evidence to show an improvement in pCR compared with standard fluoropyrimidine-based CRT. The addition of oxaliplatin might result in more pCR but at the expense of more toxicity. Furthermore, this benefit does not translate into less local recurrence or improved survival.

Phase II study of preoperative panitumumab, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Preliminary safety results (StarPan /STAR-02 Study)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4110-4110
Author(s):  
C. Pinto ◽  
F. Di Fabio ◽  
E. Maiello ◽  
P. Di Tullio ◽  
S. Pini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Moderate Increase ◽  
Concurrent Radiotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

4110 Background: The aim of this phase II study is to assess the activity of preoperative external radiotherapy combined with panitumumab, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced rectal cancer patients (pts). Methods: Pts entering the study had histologically-proven rectal adenocarcinoma, either uT3N+ or T4 N-/+ stage, with location <12 cm from the anal margin. Panitumumab was administered at a dose of 6 mg/kg IV, 2 weeks before the start of chemoradiotherapy, and then in combination with chemoradiotherapy, every 2 weeks for 3 times. 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin were administered according to an established schedule of STAR-01 Study (oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 IV weekly for six times, and 5- fluorouracil 225 mg/m2/day continuous infusion IV d 1–38). Radiotherapy was delivered up to a dose of 50.4 Gy in daily fractions of 1.8 Gy. Rectal surgery was performed 7–8 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant treatment. Eight courses of adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 plus panitumumab at a dose of 6 mg/kg, every 2 weeks, were given after surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was the complete pathological response rate. Results: From February 2007 to December 2008, 35 out of the 55 planned pts were enrolled. Twenty nine pts completed neoadjuvant treatment and 20 underwent surgery (15 pts ongoing). The characteristics of 29 pts were: males 19 (65.5%) and females 10 (34.5%); median age 58 years (range 39–78); median Karnofsky PS 100 (range 70–100); stage: uT3N+ 22 (75.9%), uT4N- 3 (10.3%), uT4N+ 4 (13.8%). The most frequent grade 1–4 side-effects were acneiform rash (96.2%), diarrhea (51.7%) and fatigue (14.3%). Grade 3 diarrhea was registered in 35.7% pts, and grade 3–4 cutaneous toxicity in 51.8%. No grade 3–4 hematological toxicity was found. The median cumulative dose of delivered radiotherapy was 50.4 Gy. The planned dose of panitumumab, 5-fluourouracil and oxaliplatin was administered in 83%, 72% and 67% of pts, respectively. Conclusions: Despite the moderate increase of diarrhea, these early results demonstrate that panitumumab can be safety added to 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin-based chemoradiotherapy, without compromising the concurrent radiotherapy dose. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase Ib/II study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with CRLX101 and capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15144-e15144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Wang ◽  
Autumn Jackson McRee ◽  
A. William Blackstock ◽  
Bert H. O'Neil ◽  
Dominic T. Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Grade 3

e15144 Background: There is strong interest in the development of novel agents to further improve the therapeutic ratio of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. CRLX101 is an investigational nanoparticle-drug conjugate with a camptothecin payload. The purpose of this Phase Ib/II study is to assess toxicity and to evaluate whether the addition of CRLX101 to chemoradiotherapy can improve pathologic complete response (pCR) for rectal cancer. Methods: This is a single-arm multicenter Phase Ib/II study examining the addition of CRLX101 to a standard capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy regimen. Phase Ib employs a 3+3 dose escalation design with starting dose of 12 mg/m2 every other week (QOW). Dose level +1 was 15 mg/m2 (MTD for CRLX101 single agent QOW). Upon reaching MTD for QOW dosing, protocol was modified to evaluate QW CRLX101 dosing starting at 12 mg/m2 and 15 mg/m2as +1 level. Secondary endpoints included pCR and clinical outcome. Results: A total of 32 patients were enrolled on the trial. 26/32 had T3-4, 9/32 had N2 and 16/32 had N1 disease. For QOW dosing, 9 patients completed treatment without DLT and MTD was identified as 15 mg/m2 QOW. 14 patients were treated on the Phase II portion of the study at 15 mg/m2 QOW prior to the initiation of weekly dosing Phase Ib cohorts. For QW dosing, 0/3 patients experienced DLT at 12 mg/m2 and 1/6 patients experienced DLT at 15 mg/m2. The DLT was skin desquamation requiring treatment delay. QW MTD was identified as 15 mg/m2. Toxicities (all grade 3 except lymphopenia) that could possibly be attributed to CRLX101 are in Table 1. Full clinical and pathologic staging were available for 29/32 patients. Mean neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score was 19 with standard deviation of 15. At the weekly MTD, 3/6 patients had pCR. Conclusions: CRLX101 weekly at 15 mg/m2+ standard capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy appears to be well tolerated, with promising pCR rates that warrants further evaluation. A larger PhII trial should be considered with this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT02010567. [Table: see text]

Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy without Radiation for Rectal Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Matsumoto ◽  
Suguru Hasegawa ◽  
Masazumi Zaima ◽  
Naoya Inoue ◽  
Yoshiharu Sakai
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Grade 3

Aim: The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation (NAC) in the treatment of rectal cancer remains unclear. This retrospective study was aimed at determining the pathological complete response rate and short-term outcomes of NAC in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: We collected data on 159 consecutive patients treated for rectal cancer (cT3/cT4a, cN+, and cM0 status) at five tertiary referral hospitals between 2005 and 2010. Pathological complete response (pCR) and safety were assessed as the main outcomes in 124 eligible patients comprising 15 who received NAC (NAC group) and 109 who received no neoadjuvant chemotherapy (non-NAC group). Results: In the NAC group, 2 patients (13.3%) achieved a pCR (95% confidence interval: 1.7-40.5%) and 3 patients (20%) experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. No significant differences were found between the NAC and non-NAC groups in terms of short-term outcomes, including R0 proportion (100 vs. 96.3%, p = 0.45) and postoperative grade 3/4 complications (13.3 vs. 18.4%, p = 0.63). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy without radiation appears to be safe, without worsening short-term outcomes, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. A further study is needed to verify these findings in larger samples.

Phase II study of bevacizumab and cetuximab as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer: A preliminary security report.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 627-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Elvira ◽  
L. Torrecillas ◽  
G. Cervantes ◽  
A. A. Erzao Valle Solis
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Grade 3

627 Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer. Bevacizumab and cetuximab are accepted today in the treatment of metastatic colorrectal cancer. We evaluate the activity and security of these drugs in the neoadyuvante setting. Methods: Ten patients have been included so far. Treatment consists in a first phase with induction treatment with capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2 D1-14, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 and bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks for two cycles. In sequential form a second phase that consist in external beam radiation therapy that was given at 50.4 Gy in 28 sesions concurrently with capecitabine 1,300 mg/m2 /d continuous during radiotherapy with cetuximab 400 mg/m2 every two weeks in patients with k-ras wild type. Results: 10 patients completed induction treatment and eight patients completed the concurrent phase. As of today, two patients are still on treatment. At this point, four patients have been operated; three patients are still waiting for surgery, and one avoided surgery. During induction treatment the main toxicity was disesthesias in eight patients, four patient presented grade 2 emesis, two presented grade 2 altered liver function test, two had grade 2 hand foot syndrome. One patient presented grade 3 hemorrhage. During the second phase, eight patients received cetuximab and presented rash grade 1-2, diarrhea grade 1 in five patients, emesis grade 1 in four patients, anemia grade 2 in two patients, proctitis grade 2 in four patients, and grade 3 in one patient. From four patients who were operated two presented complete pathological response and two have tumor persistence. Conclusions: The combination of chemoradiation with bevacizumab and cetuximab seems to be secure with no increment in toxicity and those presented are acceptable and manageable. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Deferral of rectal surgery following a continued response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (Watch and Wait) study: A phase II multicenter study in the United Kingdom.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 489-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Yu ◽  
G. Brown ◽  
R. J. Heald ◽  
S. Chua ◽  
G. Cook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Pet Ct

489 Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgical resection are standard components of therapy for patients locally advanced rectal cancer (T3,T4 or N+) in UK. In 15%-30% of patients treated pre-operatively with CRT will develop pathological complete response (CR). The time from completion of CRT to maximal tumour response is as yet unknown. This study is the first prospective study to attempt to identify the percentage of patients who can safely omit surgery and the safety of deferred surgery in patients who achieve clinical complete response post CRT. Of the 59 patients required for the study, this provides an update on 19 patients entered. Methods: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer requiring neoadjuvant treatment are identified in the multidisciplinary meet (MDT). Patients undergo CRT using a minimum of 50.4Gy in 28 # daily conformal CT planned CRT with concomitant Capecitabine at 825mg/m2 BD. MRI pelvis and body CT are repeated 4 weeks post CRT and rediscussed at MDT. If there is a good partial response or CR, patients are considered for Deferral of Surgery Study. Based on the pre treatment clinical staging, patients are considered for adjuvant chemotherapy as per NICE guidance. At any point of the study, if there is histology proven tumour regrowth or progression, patient undergo surgery. Results: 10 (53%) patients remain in CR. 6 (32%) patients underwent surgical resection with clear margin after detection of tumour regrowth at from 2-23 months post CRT. 5 out of 6 of the patients with tumour regrowth underwent PET CT as per protocol, and all tumour regrowth in those 5 patients were detected by PET CT, i.e. FDG avid disease. The pathological stages on these 6 patients were ypT2N0 CRM negative in 5 and ypT3N0 CRM negative in 1. 3 (15%) patients with tumour regrowth refused surgery. Conclusions: In the 19 recruited patients, all the patients with tumour regrowth underwent surgical resection with clear margins. PET CT appears a useful tool for detecting tumour regrowth. The median time for tumour regrowth is 17.5 months post CRT. The trial will be successful if at least 11/59 patients are able to safely omit surgery. Accrual of patients continues. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document