scholarly journals The Gaze of the other: emotion and relation in the Brothers Karamazov

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-248
Author(s):  
Federica Bergamino
Religions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 506
Author(s):  
Alexander Zholkovsky

This paper problematizes the now widely accepted concept of Dostoevsky’s dialogism, which alleges the ‘Author’s’ equal empowerment of all his characters. Using examples from Crime and Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov, Zholkovsky focuses on instances of ‘scene-staging’ based on the ‘scripts’ devised and enacted by some characters, that are ‘read,’ with varying success, by their targets. He documents the resulting ‘discursive combat’ among the characters, with special attention paid to those ‘playing god’ and thus, the more ‘authorial’ among them. In several cases, the would-be ‘divine’ manipulation is shown to be consistently subverted by the Dostoevskian narrative. However, in one instance, where Aliosha Karamazov charitably scripts Captain Snegirev’s behavior, the ensuing discussion of this episode, in Aliosha’s conversations with Lise Khokhlakova, upholds Aliosha’s right to play god with the Other—“for the Other’s own good”, of course (not unlike the Grand Inquisitor).


SlavVaria ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
ДИАНА КОМЯТИ

“Two novels of one biography”: “Three years” by A.P. Chekhov and “The Brothers Karamazov” by F.M. Dostoevsky. In contemporary Chekhov studies the significance of Dostoevsky’s creative heritage in Chekhov’ artistic world is increasingly comprehended. They attempt to reveal and interpret intertextual connections with Dostoevsky’s novels, embedded in the subtext of Chekhov’s works. On the one hand, common themes and problems that bring writers closer together are revealed, on the other hand, Chekhov’s polemical rethinking of Dostoevsky’s legacy is noted. Connected with this tendency the article deals with comparative analysis of Chekhov’s story “Three Years” and Dostoevsky’s novel “The Brothers Karamazov”. In this work we try to identify and interpretate the allusions and parallels hidden in Chekhov’s story.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 54-75
Author(s):  
Kåre Johan Mjør

The article analyses a set of philosophical statements made by and attributed to Ivan Karamazov in Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov, in order to answer the question as to what kind of philosophy Ivan may be said to express in the novel. My close reading reveals that there is a significant distinction between, on the one hand,  Ivan's most radical statements, that is his rational egoism and the idea that "everything is permitted," which are always given in reported speech, and on the other the “Ivan of direct speech,” a character characterized by far more moral sensibility (e.g. in the Pro et contra part). On the basis of these findings the article seeks to bring together two traditions in the reception of Dostoevsky—the philosophical and the narratological. By letting these approaches inform one another I suggest ways in which the structural organization of the text is itself a bearer of philosophical meaning. Moreover, the article takes seriously Bakhtin's claim that Dostoevsky's heroes are not merely stable representations of ideas, but engage with them through dialogue and encounters with others, as exemplified by Ivan Karamazov himself as well as by other characters' responses to his articulations. 


Author(s):  
Robert Pfaller

Dostoyevsky’s novel Brothers Karamazov contains, as Sigmund Freud has perspicuously noted, an utterly paradoxical and psychologically most interesting scene - one that immediately calls for attention from the perspective of the theory of interpassivity: Why can one be relieved and grateful to someone else for having killed his father - even if they are not brothers? By what psychic mechanism does the parricide of the other allow one to renounce one’s own? Is it identification? Or love? Or something else?


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 84-93
Author(s):  
M. B. Plyukhanova ◽  

The article is based on the idea that fi ve Dostoevsky’s novels can be interpreted as one continuous text. This opinion has already been expressed by Vyacheslav Ivanov, Petr Bitsilli and others, in various frameworks. The article shows how certain scenes and details migrate from one novel to the other, gaining key positions in the novels’ structure. Scenes involving a coffi n with the body of a victim (a woman, a child), are analyzed: flowers, birds, a fly acquire different functions and meanings in such scenes in "Crime and Punishment", "The Idiot", "The Eternal Husband", "The Brothers Karamazov". The concept of one continuous work («great novel», or «super-novel») takes shape through correspondences and contrasts between such images and details.


2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Gene Fitzgerald ◽  
Robert Louis Jackson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document