The Fate of the Tricuspid Valve in Rheumatic Mitral Valve Surgery: When and How to Touch?

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Davut Cekmecelioglu ◽  
Mehmet Dedemoglu ◽  
Hakan Hancer ◽  
Atakan Tekin ◽  
Alizamin Yusifli ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1103-1110
Author(s):  
Florian E. M. Herrmann ◽  
Anne‐Sophie Schleith ◽  
Helen Graf ◽  
Sebastian Sadoni ◽  
Christian Hagl ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 552-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Jansen ◽  
B. R. van Klarenbosch ◽  
M. J. Cramer ◽  
R. C. A. Meijer ◽  
P. H. M. Westendorp ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (08) ◽  
pp. 601-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Misfeld ◽  
Martin Haensig ◽  
Piroze Davierwala ◽  
Friedrich Mohr ◽  
Bettina Pfannmueller

AbstractTricuspid valve (TV) regurgitation in patients after previous mitral valve surgery is usually a secondary failure and conditioned by a long-lasting left-sided valve failure. TV surgery in these patients represents a high-risk procedure regarding the operative strategy and perioperative management. This article will discuss the indication for TV surgery in patients with secondary TV regurgitation and previous mitral valve surgery, the choice of surgical access, as well as TV repair techniques and their postoperative results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 122 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Ovcharov ◽  
A. V. Bogachev-Prokophiev ◽  
A. N. Pivkin ◽  
S. A. Budagayev ◽  
A. V. Afanasyev ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
O. D. Babliak ◽  
V. M. Demianenko ◽  
D. Y. Babliak ◽  
A. I. Marchenko ◽  
K. A. Revenko ◽  
...  

  Background. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery provides many advantages for patients. The aim. To investigate and represent our own experience in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, and to describe the operative technique. Materials and methods. The study was included 100 consecutive patients who underwent a minimally invasive mitral valve repair or replacement through the right lateral minithoracotomy from June 2017 to December 2019. Results. Mitral valve repair was performed in 87 patients (87%), and 13 patients (13%) were required mitral valve replacement. In 24 patients (24%), concomitant procedures were performed: tricuspid valve repair, atrial septal defect repair and left atrial myxomectomy. Ring anuloplasty was performed in all patients who underwent mitral valve repair. Additional methods of correction were used in accordance to the lesion anatomy: neochords implantation, cleft and leaflet perforation closure, leaflet resection, Alfieri (edge-to-edge) stitch, posterior leaflet plication. There was no in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Post-operative strokes were not reported. No wound complications were observed in the femoral cannulation area. The total length of stay in a hospital was 6 ± 1.46 (3–9) days. There were no cases of mitral valve insufficiency greater more than mild degree after mitral valve repair at the time of discharge. Conclusions. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery can be performed as a routine standard approach, provides safe and effective correction of the mitral valve defects, allows excellent results of mitral valve repair and replacement in various abnormalities. Minimally invasive approach enables to perform a large number of reconstructive valve techniques and perform simultaneous correction of atrial septal defects, tricuspid valve repair and atrial neoplasm removal.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derrick Y Tam ◽  
Andrew Tran ◽  
Amine Mazine ◽  
Gilbert H L Tang ◽  
Mario F L Gaudino ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES The surgical management of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) at the time of mitral valve surgery remains controversial. Our objectives were to determine the safety and efficacy of tricuspid valve (TV) repair during mitral valve surgery in a meta-analysis. METHODS MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from 1946 to 2017 for all studies comparing TV repair to no intervention at the time of mitral valve surgery on early and late mortality and late TR. A random-effects meta-analysis of all outcomes was performed. RESULTS One thousand four hundred and seventeen studies were retrieved and a total of 17 studies [2 randomized clinical trial (n = 211), 11 adjusted observational studies (n = 3848) and 4 unadjusted observational studies (n = 67 010)] that compared TV repair (n = 11 787) to no intervention (n = 56 027) at a mean follow-up of 6.0 ± 0.64 years were included. There was no difference in 30-day/in-hospital mortality between repair and no repair [risk ratio (RR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.70–2.02; P = 0.52]. The incidence of new permanent pacemaker implantation was higher in the TV repair group (RR 2.73, 95% CI 2.57–2.89; P < 0.01). TV repair was protective against late moderate or greater TR [incident rate ratio (IRR) 0.28, 95% CI 0.17–0.47; P < 0.01] and severe TR (IRR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17–0.84). There was a numerically lower rate of late TV reoperation (IRR 0.39, 95% CI 0.12–1.25; P = 0.11) that did not reach statistical significance. Overall, there was no difference in late mortality between the 2 treatments (IRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.63–1.24; P = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS TV repair appears safe in the perioperative period and may reduce future recurrent TR without any survival benefit.


2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (9) ◽  
pp. 2033
Author(s):  
Mohanad Hamandi ◽  
Robert Smith ◽  
William Ryan ◽  
Paul Grayburn ◽  
Alexander Crawford ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document