Effect of thrombocytopenia in patients with infective endocarditis: an insight from the National Inpatient Sample database

Introduction Infective endocarditis (IE) is one of the feared diseases in septic patients, and incidences are rising due to the intravenous drug abuse epidemic. Sepsis causes an escalation of the platelet destructions leading to thrombocytopenia (1). Few independent hospital-based studies have proposed increase mortality with thrombocytopenia in patients with IE (2–5). We aim to evaluate the significance of thrombocytopenia in IE subjects from the national inpatient sample (NIS) database. Method We analyzed the NIS database from Jan-2016 to Dec-2018 using Stata 16.0. NIS is the largest publicly available all-payer inpatient care database in the United States, containing data on more than seven million hospital stays per year. We identified patients with IE with or without thrombocytopenia using ICD-10 codes. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality comparison. We adjusted potential confounders (age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, etc.) with multivariate logistic regression analysis. Further analysis was done after balancing the population co-morbidity using a Greedy propensity match for accuracy. Results A total of 174,495 subjects were included in this study with a diagnosis of IE. Among these individuals, 33,285 patients had a concurrent diagnosis of thrombocytopenia. The mean ages were 53±19.5 years for the thrombocytopenia group and 55±19.8 years for others. Females were equally represented in both cohorts. There were 4,945 (14.86%) vs 2,835 (2.01%) mortalities reported in with and without thrombocytopenia group respectively. After propensity matching, there was a pronounced increase in mortality [Odds ratio (OR): 1.93 (1.72 – 2.15), p-value: <0.001] in the group with thrombocytopenia comparing to others. Complications such as Major bleeding requiring blood transfusion [OR: 1.45 (1.35–1.57)], acute myocardial infarction [OR: 1.56 (1.35–1.70)], complete heart block [OR: 1.44 (1.16–1.53)], cardiac arrest [OR: 1.44 (1.25–1.72)], acute respiratory failure [OR: 1.51 (1.39–1.73)] and pressor support requirement [(OR: 1.73 (1.57–2.01)] were notably higher in the cohort of thrombocytopenia with statistically significant p-value (<0.001). The difference in length of stay between both cohorts after propensity match wasn't statistically significant. Conclusion In conclusion, IE patients with thrombocytopenia have higher incidences of in-patient mortality and poor outcomes than cohort without thrombocytopenia. Some of the adverse consequences could be temporally explained by complications related to underlying thrombocytopenia. Further investigations are needed to delineate the outcome in this group of subjects. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Adjuvant Trastuzumab with or without Chemotherapy in Stage 1 pT1N0 HER2+ Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis

Purpose: Approximately 20% of all breast cancers (BC) are HER2 amplified. In the APT trial, weekly paclitaxel/ trastuzumab in node negative HER2+ BC with tumors <3 cm was associated with a 7-year invasive disease-free survival of 93%. However, this was in the context of a non-randomized trial, and for pT1N0 HER2+ BC it remains unclear whether HER2 monotherapy would provide similar clinical outcomes to chemo-HER2 therapy. We hypothesized that adjuvant chemo-HER2 therapy would be associated with a modestly improved overall survival compared to HER2 monotherapy in patients with tumors <2cm. Methods: In the National Cancer Database (2004-2017), patients with a primary diagnosis of pT1N0M0 HER2+ BC, were separated into two groups: (i) HER2 monotherapy, i.e. trastuzumab, and (ii) chemo-HER2 therapy. A 3:1 propensity match was performed to balance patient selection bias between the two different cohorts. Long-term overall survival (OS) was compared between both groups. Results: A total of 23, 281 patients met the criteria. 22,268 (96.7%) received chemo-HER2 therapy and 1,013 (4.4%) received HER2 monotherapy. Propensity match identified 1,995 patients who received chemo-HER2 therapy, and 666 who received HER2 monotherapy. After match, adjuvant chemo-HER2 therapy was associated with a modest survival advantage over HER2 monotherapy (5-year OS 94.1% vs. 90.6%, P=0.041). Conclusions: Even though there is a modest OS advantage favoring adjuvant chemo-HER2 therapy in pT1N0 HER2+ BC, HER2 monotherapy was associated with 5-year OS >90%. Therefore, in select patients who have contraindications for cytotoxic chemotherapy, or decline adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant trastuzumab monotherapy appears to be a reasonable alternative.

Minimally Invasive Mastectomy Could Achieve Non-inferior Oncological Outcome in Appropriately Selected Patients: Propensity Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Database

Background Minimally invasive mastectomy (MIM) was emerged as an approach to decrease morbidity and increase patient satisfaction through improved cosmetic results; however, there is a paucity of data regarding the long-term oncologic outcomes of these minimally invasive approaches. Methods Patients who underwent mastectomy procedures were identified in the National Cancer Database (2010-2016). Patients were categorized as MIM or open mastectomy. A 1:1 propensity match was performed to balance the bias on reconstruction, nipple sparing, lymph node procedures, and other confounding factors between the cohorts. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared. Results A total of 328 811 patients met the criteria: 327 643 (99.6%) received open mastectomy and 1168 (.4%) received MIM. Propensity match identified 384 “pairs” of MIM and open mastectomy patients. Among them, MIM was associated with shorter length of stay (LOS) (mean 1.3 vs. 1.06 days, P = .003). No differences were observed in the rates of positive margins, unplanned readmissions, or 90-day mortality between the 2 operative approaches. Overall survival (OS) was equivalent between MIM and open mastectomy patients. Cox proportional hazard regression showed no effect of the procedure performed on OS. Discussion MIM is associated with shorter LOS, and it is non-inferior to open mastectomy in terms of other short-term outcomes and long-term oncologic survival outcomes. These data suggest that MIM may be considered in appropriately selected breast cancer patients as an additional approach to the community.