Longitudinal research: methods for maximizing subject follow-up

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. WUTZKE ◽  
K. M. CONIGRAVE ◽  
B. E. KOGLER ◽  
J. B. SAUNDERS ◽  
W. D. HALL
2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodi Constantine Brown ◽  
Hyun-Sun Park

This exploratory research compares longitudinal research self-efficacy and retention between a completely asynchronous Master of Social Work (MSW) online cohort and its traditional face-to-face counterpart. This study used a non-equivalent comparison groups design with two groups: online instruction only (n=16) and traditional face-to-face instruction (n=32), with pretest (Time 1), posttest (Time 2) and follow-up (Time 3) standardized measures of practice evaluation knowledge (PEKS) and research self-efficacy (RSES) in a beginning research methods course. Results indicate that students’ knowledge and research self-efficacy improved between pretest and posttest and remained significantly improved at follow-up one year later, with no significant difference between online learners and traditional face-to-face students. Students gain and maintain confidence in research methods and evaluation regardless of the learning platform utilized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document