Follow-up after repair of vaginal vault prolapse with abdominal colposacropexy

1999 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Pilsgaard ◽  
Lone Mouritsen
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Vault Prolapse

scholarly journals Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty versus Unilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virva Nyyssönen ◽  
Anne Talvensaari-Mattila ◽  
Markku Santala
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Intravaginal Slingplasty

Objective. To investigate the differences in efficacy, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction between posterior intravaginal slingplasty (PIVS) and unilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) procedures. Study Design. A retrospective study of thirty-three women who underwent PIVS or SSLF treatment for vaginal vault prolapse in Oulu University Hospital. The patients were invited to a follow-up visit to evaluate the objective and subjective outcomes. Median follow-up time was 16 months (range 6–52). The anatomical outcome was detected by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. Information on urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunctions and overall satisfaction was gathered with specific questionnaire. The data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test. Results. Mesh erosion was found in 4 (25%) patients in the PIVS group. Anatomical stage II prolapse or worse (any POP-Q point ≥−1) was detected in 8 (50%) patients in the PIVS group and 9 (53%) patients in the SSLF group. Overall satisfaction rates were 62% and 76%, respectively. Conclusion. The efficacy of PIVS and SSLF is equally poor, and the rate of vaginal erosion is intolerably high with the PIVS method. Based on our study, we cannot recommend the usage of either technique in operative treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.

scholarly journals Sacrocolpopexy in management of vaginal vault prolapse

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Javed Iqbal ◽  
Fauzia Nausheen ◽  
Fozia Ali Bhatti ◽  
Arif Tajammul Khan ◽  
Shahida Sheikh
Keyword(s):  
Operation Time ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
One Year ◽  
Study Setting

Aims & Objectives: To review the efficacy of Sacrocolpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse Study Design: Interventional study. Setting & Population: Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Women with vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy. Methods and Main-outcome measures: Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy using proline mesh. Follow-up in these patients were carried out at one week, four weeks, six months, and one year. Results: Sacrocolpopexy was carried out in ten patients for vaginal vault prolapse after vaginal (6) and abdominal hysterectomy (4). The mean age was 49.8 years. Parity was between P3 - P6 (Mean parity 4.3). Mean operation time was 79.3 minutes. Estimated blood loss was less than 200m1. No intra-operative or post-operative complications occurred in any case. Conclusion: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is effective and safe in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. This procedure has high success rate in correcting prolapse without a time dependent decrease in efficacy.

Sacrocolpopexy for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1563-1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Illiano ◽  
Konstantinos Giannitsas ◽  
Alessandro Zucchi ◽  
Manuel Di Biase ◽  
Michele Del Zingaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Posthysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse

scholarly journals Transvaginal Bilateral Sacrospinous Fixation after Second Recurrence of Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Efficacy and Impact on Quality of Life and Sexuality

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Giovanni Vitale ◽  
Antonio Simone Laganà ◽  
Marco Noventa ◽  
Pierluigi Giampaolino ◽  
Brunella Zizolfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Sacrospinous Fixation ◽  
Sf 36

Objective. Our aim was to study the efficacy of transvaginal bilateral sacrospinous fixation (TBSF) and its impact on quality of life (QoL) and sexual functions in women affected by second recurrences of vaginal vault prolapse (VVP). Materials and Methods. We performed a prospective observational study on 20 sexually active patients affected by second recurrence of VVP, previously treated with monolateral sacrospinous fixation. TBSF was performed in all the patients. They had been evaluated before the surgery and at 12-month follow-up through pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system, Short Form-36 (SF-36), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Results. At 12-month follow-up, 18 out of 20 (90%) patients were cured of their recurrent VVP. No major intra- and postoperative complications occurred. We found a significant improvement in 4/5 POP-Q landmarks (excluding total vaginal length), SF-36, and PISQ-12 scores. Conclusion. According to our data analysis, TBSF appears to be safe, effective, and able to improve both QoL and sexual functions in patients affected by second recurrence of VVP after previous monolateral sacrospinous fixation.

scholarly journals MP10-05 SACROCOLPOPEXY FOR POST-HYSTERECTOMY VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE: LONG TERM FOLLOW-UP

2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Di Biase ◽  
Ester Illiano ◽  
Konstantinos Giannitsas ◽  
Alessandro Zucchi ◽  
Massimo Lazzeri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Hybrid repair for vaginal vault prolapse: 2 years’ follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. e1941
Author(s):  
N. Kubin ◽  
D. Shkarupa ◽  
E. Shapovalova ◽  
A. Zaytseva ◽  
O. Staroseltseva
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Hybrid Repair

scholarly journals Outcome of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Post Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
Liza Chowdhury ◽  
Nurun Nahar Khanam ◽  
Junnu Rayen Janna
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Synthetic Mesh ◽  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Anterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Patients Satisfaction ◽  
Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy

Objective (s): The aim of this study was to explore the outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the correction of post hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.Materials and Methods: This prospective study was done over the period of five years from 2011 to 2015 where twenty patients of vault prolapse were subjected to abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Procedure was completed by securing the vaginal apex to the anterior longitudinal ligament of sacrum using synthetic mesh. Intra and postoperative complications and patients’ satisfaction was assessed.Results: No post-operative serious complications were reported during follow up period. The vaginal vault was well supported in all patients with no recurrent vault prolapse. One patient had mild asymptomatic rectocele. No mesh complication was found during the follow up period.Conclusion: The abdominal sacrocolpopexy achieves excellent correction of post hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse with minimal morbidity.Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2016; Vol. 31(2) : 90-93

11 Sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: Long term follow-up

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e11
Author(s):  
E. Illiano ◽  
M. Di Biase ◽  
K. Giannitsas ◽  
A. Zucchi ◽  
M. Lazzeri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Vault Prolapse ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Vault Prolapse ◽  
Long Term Follow Up
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document