Bolivar and the Political Thought of the Spanish American Revolution. By Víctor Andrés Belaunde. [The Albert Shaw Lectures on Diplomatic History, 1930, The Walter Hines Page School of International Relations.] (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press. 1938. Pp. xxiv, 451. $3.50.)

1939 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
American Revolution ◽  
Political Thought ◽  
Diplomatic History ◽  
The Political ◽  
Spanish American

Bolivar and the Political Thought of the Spanish American Revolution.

1938 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 448
Author(s):  
L. L. Bernard ◽  
Victor Andres Belaunde
Keyword(s):  
American Revolution ◽  
Political Thought ◽  
The Political ◽  
Spanish American

Bolivar and the Political Thought of the Spanish American Revolution

1939 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 671
Author(s):  
R. F. Arragon ◽  
Victor Andres Belaunde
Keyword(s):  
American Revolution ◽  
Political Thought ◽  
The Political ◽  
Spanish American

scholarly journals The Creation of Myth: Starting the First "Great Debate" in International Relations Theory

2015 ◽  
pp. 30-39
Author(s):  
T. A. Alekseeva
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Interwar Period ◽  
Political Thought ◽  
International Relations Theory ◽  
The Political ◽  
Great Debate ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Creation

From one textbook to another wanders the story about three (sometimes - four) Great debates, which formed the canonical history of the theory of international relations. In reality everything was much more complicated, and the theoretical richness much wider than many times repeated antinomic pairs - realism vs. idealism, traditionalism vs. modernism, rationalism vs. reflectivism The author regards the discussions between different trends of the political thought in the interwar period, which were later called the First "Great Debates", which, according to the author's view were pre-paradigmal.

scholarly journals New Materialisms, discourse analysis, and International Relations: a radical intertextual approach

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
TOM LUNDBORG ◽  
NICK VAUGHAN-WILLIAMS
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
International Relations ◽  
Political Thought ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Force ◽  
Theoretical Status ◽  
New Materialisms ◽  
Do So

AbstractThis article investigates the recent ‘New Materialisms’ turn in social and political thought and asks what the potential theoretical and methodological significance might be for the study of International Relations (IR). To do so we return to debates about the theoretical status of discourse in IR as it is in this context that the question of materiality – particularly as it relates to language – has featured prominently in recent years. While the concept of discourse is increasingly narrow in IR, the ‘New Materialisms’ literature emphasises the political force of materiality beyond language and representation. However, a move to reprioritise the politics of materiality over that of language and representation is equally problematic since it perpetuates rather than challenges the notion of a prior distinction between language and materiality. In response, we draw on earlier poststructural thought in order to displace this dichotomy and articulate an extended understanding of what analysing ‘discourse’ might mean in the study of IR.

Unity and difference: John Robert Seeley and the political theology of international relations

2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 559-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
DUNCAN S. A. BELL
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Political Thought ◽  
Political Theology ◽  
Global Politics ◽  
The Political ◽  
Public Intellectuals ◽  
Modern History ◽  
Adequate Account ◽  
Intellectual Context ◽  
Regius Professor

This article explores the international political thought of one of the most prominent late Victorian public intellectuals, John Robert Seeley (1834–95), the Regius Professor of Modern History at Cambridge, and author of the best-selling The Expansion of England (1883). Challenging conventional readings of Seeley, I argue that his vision of global politics must be located within the wider frame of his views on the sacred, and that he is seen best as articulating an intriguing political theology of international relations. In particular, I argue that instead of interpreting him as a realist, as has traditionally been the case, his position is classified most accurately as ‘cosmopolitan nationalism’. Only by situating him in the intellectual context(s) of his time is it possible to provide an adequate account of the identity of his political thought.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document