LNE–LNHB air-kerma and absorbed dose to water primary standards for low dose-rate125I brachytherapy sources

Metrologia ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. S189-S192 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Aubineau-Lanièce ◽  
B Chauvenet ◽  
D Cutarella ◽  
J Gouriou ◽  
J Plagnard ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
K. Hohlfeld ◽  
P. Andreo ◽  
O. Mattsson ◽  
J. P. Simoen

This report examines the methods by which absorbed dose to water can be determined for photon radiations with maximum energies from approximately 1 MeV to 50 MeV, the beam qualities most commonly used for radiation therapy. The report is primarily concerned with methods of measurement for photon radiation, but many aspects are also relevant to the dosimetry of other therapeutic beams (high-energy electrons, protons, etc.). It deals with methods that are sufficiently precise and well established to be incorporated into the dosimetric measurement chain as primary standards (i.e., methods based on ionisation, radiation-induced chemical changes, and calorimetry using either graphite or water). The report discusses the primary dose standards used in several national standards laboratories and reviews the international comparisons that have been made. The report also describes the reference conditions that are suitable for establishing primary standards and provides a formalism for determining absorbed dose, including a discussion of correction factors needed under conditions other than those used to calibrate an instrument at the standards laboratory.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waheed Arshed ◽  
Khalid Mahmood ◽  
Ikramullah Qazi ◽  
Asad Ullah ◽  
Perveen Akhter ◽  
...  

An accurate calibration of the therapy level radiation dosimetry system has a pivotal role in the accuracy of dose delivery to cancer patients. The two methods used for obtaining a tissue equivalent calibration of the system: air kerma calibration and its conversion to a tissue equivalent value (absorbed dose to water) and direct calibration of the system in a water phantom, have been compared for identical irradiation geometry. It was found that the deviation between the two methods remained within a range of 0% to ?1.7% for the PTW UNIDOS dosimetry system. This means that although the recommended method is in-water calibration, under exceptional circumstances, in-air calibration may be used as well.


2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (Issue 3-4) ◽  
pp. 58-63
Author(s):  
E. Attalla ◽  
A. Elsayed ◽  
N. Khaled ◽  
H. Abou-elenein

Metrologia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (1A) ◽  
pp. 06013-06013
Author(s):  
Christian Kottler ◽  
Andreas Steurer ◽  
Frank Delaunay ◽  
Jacco de Pooter ◽  
Cristina García Mulas ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
pp. 085004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Salata ◽  
Mariano Gazineu David ◽  
Carlos Eduardo de Almeida ◽  
Islam El Gamal ◽  
Claudiu Cojocaru ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 65 (24) ◽  
pp. 245042
Author(s):  
Damian Czarnecki ◽  
Klemens Zink ◽  
Maria Pimpinella ◽  
Jorge Borbinha ◽  
Pedro Teles ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document