scholarly journals Pauli Radius of the Proton

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 121401
Author(s):  
Zhu-Fang Cui ◽  
Daniele Binosi ◽  
Craig D. Roberts ◽  
Sebastian M. Schmidt

Using a procedure based on interpolation via continued fractions supplemented by statistical sampling, we analyze proton magnetic form factor data obtained via electron+proton scattering on Q 2 ∈ [0.027, 0.55] GeV2 with the goal of determining the proton magnetic radius. The approach avoids assumptions about the function form used for data interpolation and ensuing extrapolation onto Q 2 ≃ 0 for extraction of the form factor slope. In this way, we find r M = 0.817(27) fm. Regarding the difference between proton electric and magnetic radii calculated in this way, extant data are seen to be compatible with the possibility that the slopes of the proton Dirac and Pauli form factors, F 1,2(Q 2), are not truly independent observables; to wit, the difference F ′ 1 ( 0 ) − F ′ 2 ( 0 ) / κ p = [ 1 + κ p ] / [ 4 m p 2 ] , viz., the proton Foldy term.

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 1106-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. T. Spayde ◽  
T. Averett ◽  
D. Barkhuff ◽  
D. H. Beck ◽  
E. J. Beise ◽  
...  

1975 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 2667-2669 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Höhler ◽  
H. D. Kiehlmann ◽  
W. Schmidt

1986 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1311-1330 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Dubnička ◽  
L'. Martinovič

Author(s):  
Andrew T. Boothroyd

The basic theory of magnetic scattering is presented. A response function for magnetic scattering is defined, and expressed in terms partial response functions. The relation between the partial response functions and the correlation function for components of the magnetization is obtained, and the dynamical part of the partial reponse functions is linked via the fluctuation-dissipation theorem to the absorptive part of the generalized susceptibility. It is shown how the dipole approximation can be used to simply the magnetic scattering operator for localized electrons, and the magnetic form factor is introduced. Examples of the use of the dipole magnetic form factor, as well as more general anisotropic magnetic form factors, are given. A comparison with the X-ray atomic form factor is given. Various sum rules for the magnetic response function and generalized susceptibility are obtained.


1975 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-D. Kiehlmann ◽  
W. Schmidt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document