Upper and Lower Bounds to the Free Energy Density of a One-dimensional Spin Glass Model

1991 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 263-266
Author(s):  
Tian Guangshan
1983 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 602-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Kotliar ◽  
P. W. Anderson ◽  
D. L. Stein

2021 ◽  
Vol 182 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajo Leschke ◽  
Sebastian Rothlauf ◽  
Rainer Ruder ◽  
Wolfgang Spitzer

AbstractWe extend two rigorous results of Aizenman, Lebowitz, and Ruelle in their pioneering paper of 1987 on the Sherrington–Kirkpatrick spin-glass model without external magnetic field to the quantum case with a “transverse field” of strength $$\mathsf {b}$$ b . More precisely, if the Gaussian disorder is weak in the sense that its standard deviation $$\mathsf {v}>0$$ v > 0 is smaller than the temperature $$1/\beta $$ 1 / β , then the (random) free energy almost surely equals the annealed free energy in the macroscopic limit and there is no spin-glass phase for any $$\mathsf {b}/\mathsf {v}\ge 0$$ b / v ≥ 0 . The macroscopic annealed free energy turns out to be non-trivial and given, for any $$\beta \mathsf {v}>0$$ β v > 0 , by the global minimum of a certain functional of square-integrable functions on the unit square according to a Varadhan large-deviation principle. For $$\beta \mathsf {v}<1$$ β v < 1 we determine this minimum up to the order $$(\beta \mathsf {v})^{4}$$ ( β v ) 4 with the Taylor coefficients explicitly given as functions of $$\beta \mathsf {b}$$ β b and with a remainder not exceeding $$(\beta \mathsf {v})^{6}/16$$ ( β v ) 6 / 16 . As a by-product we prove that the so-called static approximation to the minimization problem yields the wrong $$\beta \mathsf {b}$$ β b -dependence even to lowest order. Our main tool for dealing with the non-commutativity of the spin-operator components is a probabilistic representation of the Boltzmann–Gibbs operator by a Feynman–Kac (path-integral) formula based on an independent collection of Poisson processes in the positive half-line with common rate $$\beta \mathsf {b}$$ β b . Its essence dates back to Kac in 1956, but the formula was published only in 1989 by Gaveau and Schulman.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document