scholarly journals Reliability Estimation of a Component exposed to k Stresses for Gompertz-Frechet distribution

2021 ◽  
Vol 1963 (1) ◽  
pp. 012040
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Jabr ◽  
Nada S. Karam
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Adnan ◽  
Nada Sabah Karam

In this paper, the reliability of the stress-strength model is derived for probability P( <X< ) of a component strength X between two stresses ,  , when X and ,  are independent Gompertz Fréchet distribution with unknown and known shape parameters and common known scale parameters. Different methods used to estimate R and Gompertz Fréchet distribution parameters which are [Maximum Likelihood, Least square, Weighted Least square, Regression and Ranked set sampling methods], and the comparison between these estimations by simulation study based on mean square error criteria. The comparison confirms that the performance of the maximum likelihood estimator works better than the other estimators.


2021 ◽  
pp. 4892-4902
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Jabr ◽  
Nada S. Karam

In this paper, the reliability of the stress-strength model is derived for probability P(Y<X) of a component having its strength X exposed to one independent stress Y, when X and Y are following Gompertz Fréchet distribution with unknown shape parameters and known parameters . Different methods were used to estimate reliability R and Gompertz Fréchet distribution parameters, which are maximum likelihood, least square, weighted least square, regression, and ranked set sampling. Also, a comparison of these estimators was made by a simulation study based on mean square error (MSE) criteria. The comparison confirms that the performance of the maximum likelihood estimator is better than that of the other estimators.


2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1211-1230
Author(s):  
Abdus Saboor ◽  
Hassan S. Bakouch ◽  
Fernando A. Moala ◽  
Sheraz Hussain

AbstractIn this paper, a bivariate extension of exponentiated Fréchet distribution is introduced, namely a bivariate exponentiated Fréchet (BvEF) distribution whose marginals are univariate exponentiated Fréchet distribution. Several properties of the proposed distribution are discussed, such as the joint survival function, joint probability density function, marginal probability density function, conditional probability density function, moments, marginal and bivariate moment generating functions. Moreover, the proposed distribution is obtained by the Marshall-Olkin survival copula. Estimation of the parameters is investigated by the maximum likelihood with the observed information matrix. In addition to the maximum likelihood estimation method, we consider the Bayesian inference and least square estimation and compare these three methodologies for the BvEF. A simulation study is carried out to compare the performance of the estimators by the presented estimation methods. The proposed bivariate distribution with other related bivariate distributions are fitted to a real-life paired data set. It is shown that, the BvEF distribution has a superior performance among the compared distributions using several tests of goodness–of–fit.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gadde Srinivasa Rao ◽  
Kanaparthi Rosaiah ◽  
Mothukuri Sridhar Babu ◽  
Devireddy Charanaudaya Sivakumar

AbstractIn this article, acceptance sampling plans are developed for the exponentiated Fréchet distribution based on percentiles when the life test is truncated at a pre-specified time. The minimum sample size necessary to ensure the specified life percentile is obtained under a given customer's risk and producer's risk simultaneously. The operating characteristic values of the sampling plans are presented. One example with real data set is also given as an illustration.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaoru Sawazaki

&lt;p&gt;Waveforms from many aftershocks occurring immediately after a large earthquake tend to overlap in a seismogram, which makes it difficult to pick their P- and S-wave phases. Accordingly, to determine hypocenter and magnitude of the aftershocks becomes difficult and thereby causes deterioration of earthquake catalog. Using such deteriorated catalog may cause misevaluation of ongoing aftershock activity. Since aftershock activity is usually most intense in the early period after a large earthquake, requirement of early aftershock forecast and deterioration of the aftershock catalog are impatient.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Several methods for aftershock forecast, using deteriorated automatic earthquake catalog (Omi et al., 2016, 2019) or continuous seismic envelopes (Lippiello et al., 2016), have been proposed to overcome such a situation. In this study, I propose another method that evaluates excess probability of maximum amplitude (EPMA) due to aftershocks using a continuous seismogram. The proposed method is based on the extreme value statistics, which provides probability distribution of maximum amplitudes within constant time intervals. From the Gutenberg-Richter and the Omori-Utsu laws and a conventional ground motion prediction equation (GMPE), I derived this interval maximum amplitude (IMA) follows the Frechet distribution (or type &amp;#8545; extreme-value distribution). Using the Monte-Carlo based approach, I certified that this distribution is well applicable to IMAs and available for forecasting maximum amplitudes even if many seismograms are overlapped.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Applying the Frechet distribution to the first 3 hour-long seismograms of the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku earthquake (M&lt;sub&gt;W&lt;/sub&gt; 6.9), Japan, I computed the EPMAs for 4 days at 4 stations. The maximum amplitudes due to experienced aftershocks proceeded following mostly within the 10 % to 90 % EPMA curves. This performance may be acceptable for a practical use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Differently from the catalog-based method, the proposed method is almost unaffected by overlap of seismograms even in early lapse times. Since it is based on a single station processing, even seismic &amp;#8220;network&amp;#8221; is not required, and can be easily deployed at locations of poor seismic network coverage. So far, this method is correctly applicable for typical mainshock-aftershock (Omori-Utsu-like) sequence only. However, potentially, it could be extended to multiple sequences including secondary aftershocks and remotely triggered earthquakes.&lt;/p&gt;


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amal S. Hassan ◽  
M. Elgarhy ◽  
Said G. Nassr ◽  
Zubair Ahmad ◽  
Sharifah Alrajhi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document