scholarly journals Do political systems have lasting effect on climate change concern? Evidence from Germany after reunification.

Author(s):  
Yiannis Kountouris
Humanities ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Julie Doyle

Understandings of, and responses to, climate change are culturally and historically specific, informed and shaped by a complex set of intersecting social, historical, economic and political systems and representational practices [...]


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle F. Lawson ◽  
Kathryn T. Stevenson ◽  
M. Nils Peterson ◽  
Sarah J. Carrier ◽  
Erin Seekamp ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 793-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory B. Lewis ◽  
Risa Palm ◽  
Bo Feng

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Sutherland ◽  
Debra Roberts ◽  
Jo Douwes

Resilience is a ‘re-emerging concept’ which is being applied to deal with the shocks and stresses facing society and the environment as a result of both human induced and physical hazards. Resilience thinking is shaping policy and practice across the world through global programmes such as the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR)'s Making Cities Resilient Campaign; UN Habitat's City Resilience Profiling Programme; and Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities (100 RC). The global post-2015 sustainable development and climate change frameworks and related agreements all have resilience embedded in them. However, the concept of resilience remains contested, with resilience reflecting a continuum of approaches from those that are more deliberative, political, systemic, relational and transformational, to those that are more consultative, post-political, systems based, sectoral and instrumental. Questions of how resilience is being constructed, by whom and for whom therefore need to be explored. This paper focuses on the construction of resilience at three scales: The Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities (100RC) programme (global), Phase 1 of Durban's 100RC journey (city), and the Palmiet Catchment Rehabilitation Project (sub-catchment within a city). It presents the different approaches adopted by global, city-scale and local programmes to build resilience using different framings, approaches and methodologies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Dayrell ◽  
John Urry

This article examines the centrality of Brazil within the future of climate policy and politics. The state of the carbon sink of the Amazon rainforest has long been an iconic marker of the condition of the Earth. Brazil has been innovative in developing many non-carbon forms of energy generation and use and it has played a major role in international debates on global warming since the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. We examine various ways in which climate change has come to be centrally important in Brazilian public opinion. Survey evidence shows that Brazilians are the most concerned about issues of climate change – with less climate change scepticism as compared with more ‘advanced’ societies. Through using techniques of corpus linguistics we examine how Brazilian media has engendered and stabilized such a high and striking level of climate change concern. We show that the media helped to fix a ‘climate change framing’ of recent often strange weather. The article analyses the newly constructed Brazilian Corpus on Climate Change, presenting data on a scale and reach that is unique in this area of research.


Science ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 338 (6108) ◽  
pp. 788-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Kennett ◽  
S. F. M. Breitenbach ◽  
V. V. Aquino ◽  
Y. Asmerom ◽  
J. Awe ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1946-1953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gazi Mahabubul Alam ◽  
Ferdous Ahmed ◽  
Abul Quasem Al-Amin ◽  
Che Hashim Hassan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ullrich K. H. Ecker ◽  
Lucy H. Butler ◽  
John Cook ◽  
Mark J. Hurlstone ◽  
Tim Kurz ◽  
...  

The COVID-19 pandemic has understandably dominated public discourse,crowding out other important issues such as climate change. Currently, if climate change enters the arena of public debate, it primarily does so in direct relation to the pandemic. In two experiments, we investigated (1) whether portraying the response to the COVID-19 threat as a “trial run” for future climate action would increase climate-change concern and mitigation support, and (2) whether portraying climate change as a concern that needs to take a “back seat” while focus lies on economic recovery would decrease climate-change concern and mitigation support. We found no support for the effectiveness of a trial-run frame in either experiment. In Experiment 1, we found that a back-seat frame reduced participants’ support for mitigative action. In Experiment 2, the back-seat framing reduced both climate-change concern and mitigation support; a combined inoculation and refutation was able to offset the drop in climate concern but not the reduction in mitigation support.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document