An investigation of publication status alternation of papers online first in China: Based on CNKI data from 2017 to 2019

[Purposes] This study aims to investigate the publication status alternation of papers online first and reveal how the Regulations for Alteration of Publication Status and Content Correction of Online Publications on CNKI (Regulations for short) is implemented. [Methods] Firstly, we retrieved the withdrawal declarations of papers online first marked with "withdrawal" on CNKI from 2017 to 2019. Secondly, we downloaded them and saved the documents after coding. Then, the file directories were imported into Endnote X9 (a kind of reference management software) for statistical analysis and the texts of declarations were input into NVivo 12 Plus (a type of qualitative data analysis software) for cause classification. Finally, we analyzed the subject distribution, source journals, and causes of the "withdrawal". [Findings] From 2017 to 2019, the publication statuses of 389 articles online first have been altered, with 310 withdrawn, 74 retracted, and 5 corrected. Among them, only 278 (71.47%) state specific causes in the withdrawal statements and the causes are academic misconduct (32), authorship (25), publishing errors (82), quality problems (118), and others (21). [Conclusions] The online-first articles have a high proportion (389/182654, 0.21%) of publication status alternation and a small percentage of them (6/389, 1.54%) have strictly complied with the requirements of the Regulations, as manifested by the missing or vague causes for the publication status alternation in the withdrawal statements and even the deliberately covered-up academic misconducts. Academic journal publishers and digital publishing platforms should enhance the process management and content review of papers published online first and further improve the transparency of the causes of publication status alternation, visibility of withdrawal declarations, and traceability of the "withdrawal" process.

Pengaruh Social Media Marketing, E-Service Quality, dan Review Content terhadap Minat Beli pada UMKM Produk Organik

Advances in information technology and digital-based economy expand the potential for entrepreneurship. Market segmentation becomes more extensive due to an online marketplace to sell goods and services. Online marketplace company needs an edge to compete with other similar businesses. Nyayur uses various marketing strategies to be able to compete. This study aimed to determine the influence of social media marketing, review content, and e-service quality on buying interest among users of Nyayur in Salatiga. The data is collected using purposive sampling techniques with questionnaires distributed directly to fifty users of Nyayur. The data obtained were processed using IBM SPSS statistics 25. The results showed that social media marketing, e-service quality, and content review do not influence purchase intention. This research can be an additional consideration for Nyayur.com in improving the quality of its operations, where this research provides factual evidence from consumers regarding their perception of Nyayur.com. So that this research can be used as material for monitoring and evaluation (Monev) of e-commerce platforms to improve the quality and professionalism of work, especially for Nyayur. com. Services using social media promotions can update their marketing strategy, considering that most users are housewives who do not actively use social media in the form of platforms. E-service quality can provide product consulting services for fruit and vegetables via calls or Whatsapp. Reviewing content on nyanyur.com is essential to support the progress of its performance. Consumers who provide the best reviews can be rewarded to help the nyayur.com application in the future.

Networks in the Implementation of Illegal Gold Mining Countermeasure Policy in Kuantan Singingi Regency

This study aims to determine the implementation of the Illegal Gold Mining (IGM) Countermeasure policy in the Kuantan Singingi Regency. This study uses a multi-sectoral multi-organizational network model consisting of a Contextual Assessment approach to understanding the environmental context and identifying stakeholders in policy implementation and joint visioning. This study critically examines the IGM in the regency in qualitative perspective from various related articles. A systematic literature review was used to analyze national and international journal articles from nine managed databases based on these concerns. From the literature review, 22 relevant research-based articles in the last 15 years from 2007 to 2020 were selected from Google Scholar, Taylor, Francis Outline, Springer Link, Emerald Insight, Science Direct, Sage Journal Online, and Oxford Cambridge. Three stages were carried out: preparation, screening and validation, and content review. The findings include 1) research showing that stakeholders involved from both government and community groups do not play an active and synergistic role in controlling IGM. 2) the implementation model of the IGM countermeasure, the government, the private sector, and the community must support each other in controlling and supervising IGM.

A Content Review of Life Cycle Assessment of Nanomaterials: Current Practices, Challenges, and Future Prospects

This paper provides a comprehensive review of 71 previous studies on the life cycle assessment (LCA) of nanomaterials (NMs) from 2001 to 2020 (19 years). Although various studies have been carried out to assess the efficiency and potential of wastes for nanotechnology, little attention has been paid to conducting a comprehensive analysis related to the environmental performance and hotspot of NMs, based on LCA methodology. Therefore, this paper highlights and discusses LCA methodology’s basis (goal and scope definition, system boundary, life cycle inventory, life cycle impact assessment, and interpretation) to insights into current practices, limitations, progress, and challenges of LCA application NMs. We found that there is still a lack of comprehensive LCA study on the environmental impacts of NMs until end-of-life stages, thereby potentially supporting misleading conclusions, in most of the previous studies reviewed. For a comprehensive evaluation of LCA of NMs, we recommend that future studies should: (1) report more detailed and transparent LCI data within NMs LCA studies; (2) consider the environmental impacts and potential risks of NMs within their whole life cycle; (3) adopt a transparent and prudent characterization model; and (4) include toxicity, uncertainty, and sensitivity assessments to analyze the exposure pathways of NMs further. Future recommendations towards improvement and harmonization of methodological for future research directions were discussed and provided. This study’s findings redound to future research in the field of LCA NMs specifically, considering that the release of NMs into the environment is yet to be explored due to limited understanding of the mechanisms and pathways involved.

Peer Review Declaration

All conference organizers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: The ICoPIs 2021 manuscripts were reviewed using double-blind peer review. One reviewer reviewed one manuscript. The number of papers submitted was 62 articles. The number of ICoPIs 2021 reviewers were 9 people. The reviewing processes were conducted via email or OCS. The manuscripts in ICoPIs 2021 have been through two stages of review. The first review stage involved three steps. First, manuscripts were distributed to the 10 reviewers. Second, the ICoPIs team checked the similarity of the manuscript. Third, the reviewed manuscripts consisting of the reviewer’s detailed comments were returned to the authors, along with the review summary form and the similarity check results. The authors were requested to return the revision of their papers within a certain period of time. In the second review stage, the editorial team scrutinized the revised manuscripts with the summary review form and the similarity percentage. If the revision has followed the comments and suggestions from reviewers and the limitation of similarity, the manuscript would be forwarded for language and template check. • Conference submission management system: OCS (https://fisika.fkip.untad.ac.id/icopis/) • The number of submissions received: There were 62 articles submitted to the ICoPIs 2021 • The number of submissions sent for review: There were 56 articles reviewed by the reviewers of the ICoPIs 2021 • The number of submissions accepted: There were 37 articles accepted for recommendation/publication to JPCS IOP Publishing. • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 59.68% • The average number of reviews per paper: One article was reviewed 4 times; twice for content review and a similarity check, once for language and once more for the template. • The total number of reviewers involved: There were 24 reviewers involved, consisting of 9 content reviewers, 10 editors (review content and templates), and 5 language reviewers. • Any additional info on the review process: While the ICoPIs team waited for the manuscripts from the reviewers, we checked the similarity of the papers. We sent three documents to the authors for the first review stage, including the reviewed manuscript, the summary of the review form, and the result of a similarity check. The authors sent the revised article along with the similarity check (maximum 20%). The manuscripts entered the second review stage. When a manuscript has followed the comments and suggestions from reviewers and was considered suitable for publication, the manuscript then proceeded to the editors for the template and language check. We did a similarity check once more during this phase but only for the manuscript with a high similarity percentage in the first review stage. So, one manuscript has been through a similarity check 2 to 3 times. • Contact person for queries: +628975586104 (Misbah) Universitas Lambung Mangkurat [email protected]

Peer review declaration

All conference organizers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) The SNPF 2021 article review process was carried out using a single-blind review system. The number of papers submitted was 84 articles. The number of SNPF 2021 reviewers is 14 people. One reviewer reviewed one article. The review process was done via email and or OCS. The article review results were returned to the authors for revision within a certain period of time. The author sent the revised results, and the plagiarism checked results of the article. The editor then rechecked the revision result. If suitable, it would be forwarded to the editor, either for plagiarism, language, or template. • Conference submission management system: OCS (http://snpfmotogpe.ulm.ac.id/ocs/index.php/snpf/2021) • The number of submissions received: There were 84 articles submitted to SNPF 2021 • The number of submissions sent for review: There were 84 articles reviewed by reviewers of SNPF 2021. • The number of submissions accepted: There were 40 articles accepted for recommendation/publication to JPCS IOP Publishing. • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 47,61% • The average number of reviews per paper: One article was reviewed four times: content review 2x, language review 1x, and template review 1x. • The total number of reviewers involved: There were 14 reviewers (content review), 10 editors (content and template review), and 4 people (language review) • Any additional info on the review process: The author sent the revised article along with the similarity check (maximum 20%). A similarity check was also carried out using Turnitin (maximum 20%) when an article was declared fit for publication. So, the similarity check was done two times. • Contact person for queries: +628975586104 (Misbah) Universitas Lambung Mangkurat [email protected]

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind The conference papers were double-blind reviewed, where the identity of both author and reviewer on the papers will be hidden. The process is started by manuscript submission to EasyChair- web-based conference management software system. The editorial team then doing plagiarism check using DrillBit plagiarism software on submitted papers. The plagiarism process is under no-repository mode. If the plagiarism result exceeds 10%, the paper will be returned to the author for revision and request for new submission. For papers passed the similarity checks, the editorial member will then assign the papers to two reviewers for topic-related content review within designated time limits. All reviewers will have access link to the papers to evaluate and judge substantial indicators, such as: abstract sufficiently informative; clarity in the presentation of findings; methodology appropriate to study; results or conclusion supported by data analysis; and originality/novelty of finding. Clarity of figures and texts are also the main concern. The reviewers can also write their constructive critics directly in the EasyChair and put their judgement for the papers to be: (1) accepted and continued for camera-ready version, (2) accepted with minor revision, (3) accepted with major revision, or (4) rejected. Editors will notify all authors about the review results by email. • Number of submissions received: 250 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 210 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 115 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 210 / 250 x 100 = 46% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews • Total number of reviewers involved: 25 reviewers Address: Dr. Veerendrakumar C Khed (5894), Professor, Organizing Secretary ICACE-2021 Research Group Head (Structural Engg) Department of Civil Engineering, K L Deemed to be UNIVERSITY,Guntur. Phone: +91 9480374757, Mail: [email protected]

Issues of World History and Ukraine's Role in it on the Pages of “the International Relations of Ukraine: Scientific Searches and Findings” (a Content Review of Issues 1-29 from 1991 to 2020)

The paper presents a content review of “the International Relations of Ukraine: Scientific Searches and Findings” (issues 1-29 from 1991 to 2020). The author highlights that after Ukraine regained its independence in 1991, a wide network of Ukrainian periodicals in the humanities was established. These periodicals perform an important coordinating function, accumulate the efforts of authors, editors and reviewers from different regions of Ukraine and foreign countries and unite them into united teams, as well as reflect trends in scientific development, provide an opportunity to discuss topical issues, influence the dynamics of conceptual updating of socio-humanitarian disciplines in Ukraine. In 1991, the first specialised periodical on world history in independent Ukraine – the Yearbook "International Relations of Ukraine: Scientific Searches and Findings" – was created. The purpose of this Yearbook is to coordinate research carried out by representatives of "the Historical European Studies" Ukrainian academic school. The founders of this school are corresponding members of the NAS of Ukraine F.P. Shevchenko (1914-1995), I.M. Mel'nykova (1918-2010) and P.S. Sokhan' (1926-2013). Since 1991, corresponding member of the NAS of Ukraine S.V. Vidnyanskyj heads the Department of World History and International Relations (since 2012 the Department of the History of International Relations and Foreign Policy of Ukraine) and leads the aforementioned academic school. In general, the papers published in “the International Relations of Ukraine: Scientific Searches and Findings” from 1991 to 2020 contribute to the reconstruction of a broad panorama of international relations in the lands of Ukraine from the times of Kyivan Rus' until the early 21st century. During its almost thirty-year history, the Yearbook has become an influential periodical of Central and Eastern Europe, contributing to the coordination of fundamental research on world history and the understanding of key issues in world history and Ukraine's place in it

Development prospects of primary education integration (on the example of exact and natural sciences)

This article discusses current state of science integration in primary education reflected in the literature and relevant sources review. In addition, integration of science content review given its meaning and function fully expresses the essence of education. The article also emphasizes importance of correctly established student - teacher relationships in the primary education process and their significant effect on education quality. The research work also puts forward the idea of designing the disciplines’ integration process on the basis of the opinion of teachers and argumentation of the result.

Analysis of Character Education Values in 4th Grade Student Thematic Books in the 2013 Curriculum

This study aimed to analyze the values of character education in the thematic books of 4th-grade Curriculum 2013 students. Textbooks or teaching materials are among the most important learning tools in stimulating, advancing, educating, and improving the nation's welfare and having a meaningful role in student achievement. The importance of teaching materials as a medium for internalizing educational values, teaching materials should be packaged based on character education. The research was conducted at SDN Tanah Tinggi 7 Tangerang City in the 4th-grade skills. The method used is qualitative research. The data source used was the thematic book of the 2013 curriculum for the 4th-grade students. The data were obtained using content review techniques, observation, and interviews. Data analysis is done by using content analysis systematically on the thematic books being studied. The results showed that half of the 4th grade have loaded character values contracted in the 2013 curriculum. Values curriculum most common character is the character value friendly, communicative and likes to read. Meanwhile, the least character value found was the character value of the national spirit