Application of Genome-Scale Metabolic Models in Metabolic Engineering

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Alberto Garcia-Albornoz ◽  
Jens Nielsen
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 830-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingxing Jian ◽  
Ningchuan Li ◽  
Qian Chen ◽  
Qiang Hua

Reconstruction and application of genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) have facilitated metabolic engineering by providing a platform on which systematic computational analysis of metabolic networks can be performed.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dikshant Pradhan ◽  
Jason A. Papin ◽  
Paul A. Jensen

AbstractFlux coupling identifies sets of reactions whose fluxes are “coupled" or correlated in genome-scale models. By identified sets of coupled reactions, modelers can 1.) reduce the dimensionality of genome-scale models, 2.) identify reactions that must be modulated together during metabolic engineering, and 3.) identify sets of important enzymes using high-throughput data. We present three computational tools to improve the efficiency, applicability, and biological interpretability of flux coupling analysis.The first algorithm (cachedFCF) uses information from intermediate solutions to decrease the runtime of standard flux coupling methods by 10-100 fold. Importantly, cachedFCF makes no assumptions regarding the structure of the underlying model, allowing efficient flux coupling analysis of models with non-convex constraints.We next developed a mathematical framework (FALCON) that incorporates enzyme activity as continuous variables in genome-scale models. Using data from gene expression and fitness assays, we verified that enzyme sets calculated directly from FALCON models are more functionally coherent than sets of enzymes collected from coupled reaction sets.Finally, we present a method (delete-and-couple) for expanding enzyme sets to allow redundancies and branches in the associated metabolic pathways. The expanded enzyme sets align with known biological pathways and retain functional coherence. The expanded enzyme sets allow pathway-level analyses of genome-scale metabolic models.Together, our algorithms extend flux coupling techniques to enzymatic networks and models with transcriptional regulation and other non-convex constraints. By expanding the efficiency and flexibility of flux coupling, we believe this popular technique will find new applications in metabolic engineering, microbial pathogenesis, and other fields that leverage network modeling.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Zamani ◽  
Sayed-Amir Marashi ◽  
Tahmineh Lohrasebi ◽  
Mohammad-Ali Malboobi ◽  
Esmail Foroozan

Genome-scale metabolic models (GSMMs) have enabled researchers to perform systems-level studies of living organisms. As a constraint-based technique, flux balance analysis (FBA) aids computation of reaction fluxes and prediction of...


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Riemer ◽  
René Rex ◽  
Dietmar Schomburg

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nhung Pham ◽  
Ruben Van Heck ◽  
Jesse van Dam ◽  
Peter Schaap ◽  
Edoardo Saccenti ◽  
...  

Genome scale metabolic models (GEMs) are manually curated repositories describing the metabolic capabilities of an organism. GEMs have been successfully used in different research areas, ranging from systems medicine to biotechnology. However, the different naming conventions (namespaces) of databases used to build GEMs limit model reusability and prevent the integration of existing models. This problem is known in the GEM community but its extent has not been analyzed in depth. In this study, we investigate the name ambiguity and the multiplicity of non-systematic identifiers and we highlight the (in)consistency in their use in eleven biochemical databases of biochemical reactions and the problems that arise when mapping between different namespaces and databases. We found that such inconsistencies can be as high as 83.1%, thus emphasizing the need for strategies to deal with these issues. Currently, manual verification of the mappings appears to be the only solution to remove inconsistencies when combining models. Finally, we discuss several possible approaches to facilitate (future) unambiguous mapping.


2015 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 143-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongming Liu ◽  
Marcelo C. Bassalo ◽  
Ramsey I. Zeitoun ◽  
Ryan T. Gill

Microbiome ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kees C. H. van der Ark ◽  
Ruben G. A. van Heck ◽  
Vitor A. P. Martins Dos Santos ◽  
Clara Belzer ◽  
Willem M. de Vos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document