Preventing Toxic Childhood Stress in the COVID Era: A Role for Telemedicine

Author(s):  
Clement J. Bottino
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaying WANG ◽  
Bin-Bin CHEN
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 105109
Author(s):  
Carly McLaughlin ◽  
Robert Schutze ◽  
David Henley ◽  
Craig Pennell ◽  
Leon Straker ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 511-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome C. Rose ◽  
George J. Armelagos ◽  
John W. Lallo

2017 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison G. Lee ◽  
Yueh-Hsiu M. Chiu ◽  
Maria J. Rosa ◽  
Sheldon Cohen ◽  
Brent A. Coull ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
K.E. Grant ◽  
S.D. McMahon ◽  
J.S. Carter ◽  
E. Adam ◽  
S.N. Duffy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoise Mac Giollabhui ◽  
Thomas M. Olino ◽  
Johanna Nielsen ◽  
Lyn Y. Abramson ◽  
Lauren B. Alloy

It is unclear whether impaired cognition is a risk factor for depression or a consequence of depression, or whether both depression and impaired cognition are caused by a third underlying process (e.g., stress). These three hypotheses were tested in 523 adolescents assessed annually for depression, attentional functioning, and childhood/recent life stress. Baseline switching, sustained, and selective attention did not predict first onset of depression or depressive symptoms. Divided attention predicted depressive symptoms only. Piecewise growth modeling indicated that the trajectory of switching attention declined prior to first onset of depression; there was evidence of significant recovery in switching attention following first onset of depression. Structural equation modeling indicated that impaired switching attention prospectively predicted higher depressive symptoms and that higher depressive symptoms predicted worse selective and switching attention. Further, childhood stress prospectively predicted higher depressive symptoms via switching attention and worse switching attention via depressive symptoms.


Paléorient ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 45-70
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Stutz ◽  
Fanny Bocquentin ◽  
Bérénice Chamel ◽  
Marie Anton

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Veldhuis

Intimate relationships provide protections against excess stress. Little research has investigated this in same-sex/gender couples, and particularly interracial/interethnic same-sex/gender couples. In a sample of N = 215 women in same-sex/gender couple relationships, 43% if whom were in interracial/interethnic relationships, we examined differences in general stressors and both individual- and couple-level minority stressors. Women in interracial/interethnic couple relationships reported higher levels of individual-level childhood stress, microaggressions, stress related to race/ethnicity, and couple-level expectations and stereotypes. We also examined the associations between stressors and relationship outcomes and whether these associations differed comparing women in monoracial and interracial/interethnic couple relationships. We found multiple sources of general stressors and individual- and couple-level stressors that were associated with poorer relationship outcomes but found few differences by whether couples were monoracial or interracial/interethnic. Our findings have implications for couple-level interventions and highlight the importance of taking intersectional approaches to research on same-sex couples, as well as the importance of examining multiple sources and levels of stress.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document