Content Preservation*

Author(s):  
Tyler Burge
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Graham

“Content Preservation” by Tyler Burge is one of the most influential articles in the epistemology of testimony. Burge argues for three theses: (1) That we enjoy a prima facie entitlement to take testimony (presentations-as-true) at face value, (2) That this entitlement has an a priori basis, based in the nature of reason, and (3) That in some cases testimony-based beliefs are warranted a priori. Most of the debate in the testimony literature is over the truth of (1). Most of the criticism of Burge’s paper focuses on (3). Burge has since abandoned (3). What about (2)? Burge’s argument for (2) is compressed; the underlying nuts and bolts are difficult to understand. This chapter reconstructs Burge’s overall teleo-functional reliabilist framework and then reconstructs Burge’s overall argument for (2) in some detail. Three criticisms are then offered of the argument. Even granting (1), Burge’s argument does not establish (2).


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Halbert

This paper discusses the importance of a particular approach to building and sustaining digital content preservation infrastructures for cultural memory organizations (CMOs), namely distributed approaches that are cooperatively maintained by CMOs (rather than centralized approaches managed by agencies external to CMOs), and why this approach may fill a gap in capabilities for those CMOs actively digitizing historical and cultural content (rather than scientific data). Initial findings are presented from an early organizational effort (the MetaArchive Cooperative) that seeks to fill this gap for CMOs. The paper situates these claims in the larger context of selected exemplars of DP efforts in both the United States and the United Kingdom that are seeking to develop effective DP models in an attempt to recognize those organizational aspects (such as the governmental frameworks, cultural backgrounds, and other differences in emphasis) that are UK and US-specific.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 6196
Author(s):  
Chunhua Wu ◽  
Xiaolong Chen ◽  
Xingbiao Li

Currently, most text style transfer methods encode the text into a style-independent latent representation and decode it into new sentences with the target style. Due to the limitation of the latent representation, previous works can hardly get satisfactory target style sentence especially in terms of semantic remaining of the original sentence. We propose a “Mask and Generation” structure, which can obtain an explicit representation of the content of original sentence and generate the target sentence with a transformer. This explicit representation is a masked text that masks the words with the strong style attribute in the sentence. Therefore, it can preserve most of the semantic meaning of the original sentence. In addition, as it is the input of the generator, it also simplified this process compared to the current work who generate the target sentence from scratch. As the explicit representation is readable and the model has better interpretability, we can clearly know which words changed and why the words changed. We evaluate our model on two review datasets with quantitative, qualitative, and human evaluations. The experimental results show that our model generally outperform other methods in terms of transfer accuracy and content preservation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document