scholarly journals 137 Specialist Medication Review as Part of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in the Day Hospital Setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
L Bailey ◽  
L Brewer ◽  
J Carroll ◽  
S Seebah

Abstract Introduction Medication use in older people is complex. Consequently, regular medication reviews as an integral part of healthcare provision for older people are necessary. Patients attending consultant-led, multidisciplinary, day hospital clinics have specialist medication reviews undertaken by our senior clinical pharmacist. “Pharmacy Interventions” (PIs) are suggested and typed prior to physician-led patient review. Method Data collected by our senior clinical pharmacist were reviewed including patient demographics, clinical characteristics, types of prescribed drugs and PIs. Clinical severity of PIs was assessed using the NCC MERP Medication error index and American Journal Health-Syst Pharm Medication error index. Scores, ranging in clinical severity from A-I (A = capacity to cause error, I = may have contributed to death) and 0–10 (0 = no potential effect, 10 = death) were assigned by the pharmacist and two physicians. Results 100 patients were included, mean age 82y (range 65-99y). 62% were female and 63% were first time attenders. Mean number of regularly prescribed medications was 7.2 (range 1–16), 10% reported compliance issues. The most commonly prescribed drugs belonged to the “Alimentary tract and metabolism” class (24%), including PPIs, laxatives and blood-glucose lowering medications. 16% and 15% were on regularly prescribed neuroactive and psychoactive medications, respectively. Of suggested PIs, 46% were acted upon during physician review, a further 4% were acknowledged in clinical notes. PIs covered many prescribing issues including drug–drug interactions, incorrect dosing, drug monitoring and administration timing. The average PI scores assigned by the pharmacist, physicians 1 and 2 differed, at 6.4, 3.2 and 4.8, respectively. Conclusion PIs suggested at senior pharmacy level are an important component of the comprehensive geriatric assessment, highlighting multiple complex prescribing issues. Clinical severity of PIs was scored lower by physicians, perhaps indicating an underestimation of prescribing errors. Senior pharmacy involvement in the care of frail older outpatients is an invaluable resource.

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olav Sletvold ◽  
Jorunn L Helbostad ◽  
Pernille Thingstad ◽  
Kristin Taraldsen ◽  
Anders Prestmo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Veronese ◽  
Lee Smith ◽  
Ekaterini Zigoura ◽  
Mario Barbagallo ◽  
Ligia J. Dominguez ◽  
...  

Abstract Summary In this longitudinal study, with a follow-up of 8 years, multidimensional prognostic index (MPI), a product of the comprehensive geriatric assessment, significantly predicted the onset of fractures in older people affected by knee osteoarthritis. Purpose Frailty may be associated with higher fracture risk, but limited research has been carried out using a multidimensional approach to frailty assessment and diagnosis. The present research aimed to investigate whether the MPI, based on comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), is associated with the risk of fractures in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) study. Methods Community-dwellers affected by knee OA or at high risk for this condition were followed-up for 8 years. A standardized CGA including information on functional, nutritional, mood, comorbidity, medication, quality of life, and co-habitation status was used to calculate the MPI. Fractures were diagnosed using self-reported information. Cox’s regression analysis was carried out and results are reported as hazard ratios (HRs), with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for potential confounders. Results The sample consisted of 4024 individuals (mean age 61.0 years, females = 59.0%). People with incident fractures had a significant higher MPI baseline value than those without (0.42 ± 0.18 vs. 0.40 ± 0.17). After adjusting for several potential confounders, people with an MPI over 0.66 (HR = 1.49; 95%CI: 1.11–2.00) experienced a higher risk of fractures. An increase in 0.10 point in MPI score corresponded to an increase in fracture risk of 4% (HR = 1.04; 95%CI: 1.008–1.07). Higher MPI values were also associated with a higher risk of non-vertebral clinical fractures. Conclusion Higher MPI values at baseline were associated with an increased risk of fractures, reinforcing the importance of CGA in predicting fractures in older people affected by knee OA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i1-i8
Author(s):  
D Verma ◽  
F Bonora ◽  
R Walker ◽  
M Kaneshamoorthy ◽  
L Bafadhel

Abstract Introduction The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is known to deliver substantial and measurable health improvements to frail older people, including increased independence and a reduction in mortality.1 The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) can detect older adults at higher risk of complicated course and longer hospital stay.2 Despite the known benefits, previous audits has shown poor documentation on geriatric wards at Southend Hospital. Therefore, we devised a Quality Improvement Project to improve the uptake of both these. Methods A total of two Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles were completed where CGA completion and CFS documentation was audited. Each cycle lasted two weeks (25 patients). Qualitative feedback was obtained from the members of multidisciplinary team to aid improvements. The baseline audit was based on the introduction of a 2-page ward proforma for all new patients. The first intervention was an improved 2-page ward-proforma. The second intervention was a single page ward-proforma. Results Originally, 40% of new patients admitted onto the ward had a CGA assessment and CFS score. After the first intervention, 79% (19) patients had a CFS score and a CGA assessment. 21% had a full CGA completed and 58% had partial CGA. Feedback included wanting a single page proforma to increase uptake. Questions needed to be more unambiguous and more tick boxes. After the second intervention 100% (25) patients had a CFS score and a CGA assessment. 40% (10) had a full CGA completed and 60% (15) had a partial CGA. Feedback include incorporating the ward round documentation to avoid repetition. Conclusions The results show that by using a focused, concise and user-friendly proforma, uptake of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Clinical Frailty Scale can be significantly increased, bringing substantial and measurable health improvements to frail older people admitted to elderly care wards. References 1. Welsh TJ, Gordon AL, Gladman JR. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68(3):290–293. 2. Juma S, Taabazuing MM, Montero-Odasso M. Can Geriatr J. 2016;19(2):34–39.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document