Association of pre-operative medication use with unplanned 30-day hospital readmission after surgery in oncology patients receiving comprehensive geriatric assessment

2020 ◽  
Vol 219 (6) ◽  
pp. 963-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Sun Jeon ◽  
Young Mi Jeong ◽  
Jeong Yee ◽  
Eunsook Lee ◽  
Kwang-Il Kim ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-281
Author(s):  
Nadav Michaan ◽  
Sang Yoon Park ◽  
Myong Cheol Lim

Abstract Objective To investigate the correlation of comprehensive geriatric assessment to overall survival among older gynaecologic oncology patients. Methods Between 2011 and 2017, patients >70 years had geriatric assessment before treatment. Geriatric assessment included the following tests: Old American resource and services, instrumental activities of daily living, modified Barthels index, mini-mental state examination, geriatric depression scale, mini-nutritional assessment, risk of falling and medication use. Overall survival was calculated for patients’ groups below and above median tests scores. Univariate as well as multivariate analysis was done to evaluate the association between each variable and survival. Results About 120 patients had geriatric assessment. Mean patients’ age was 76.4 ± 5. A total of 78 Patients had ovarian cancer, 16 uterine cancer, 17 cervical cancer and 9 had other gynaecologic malignancies. No correlation was found between age, BMI (body mass index) and cancer type to overall survival. Patients with scores below cut-off values of modified Barthels index, instrumental activities of daily living, mini-nutritional assessment and mini-nutritional assessment had significantly shorter overall survival (P = 0.004, 0.031, 0.046 and 0.004, respectively). This remained significant in both univariate and multivariate analysis. Conclusions Gynaecologic oncology patients with lower geriatric assessment scores have significantly lower overall survival, irrespective of cancer type. Geriatric assessment tests allow objective assessment of older patients with worst prognosis before treatment planning.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
L Bailey ◽  
L Brewer ◽  
J Carroll ◽  
S Seebah

Abstract Introduction Medication use in older people is complex. Consequently, regular medication reviews as an integral part of healthcare provision for older people are necessary. Patients attending consultant-led, multidisciplinary, day hospital clinics have specialist medication reviews undertaken by our senior clinical pharmacist. “Pharmacy Interventions” (PIs) are suggested and typed prior to physician-led patient review. Method Data collected by our senior clinical pharmacist were reviewed including patient demographics, clinical characteristics, types of prescribed drugs and PIs. Clinical severity of PIs was assessed using the NCC MERP Medication error index and American Journal Health-Syst Pharm Medication error index. Scores, ranging in clinical severity from A-I (A = capacity to cause error, I = may have contributed to death) and 0–10 (0 = no potential effect, 10 = death) were assigned by the pharmacist and two physicians. Results 100 patients were included, mean age 82y (range 65-99y). 62% were female and 63% were first time attenders. Mean number of regularly prescribed medications was 7.2 (range 1–16), 10% reported compliance issues. The most commonly prescribed drugs belonged to the “Alimentary tract and metabolism” class (24%), including PPIs, laxatives and blood-glucose lowering medications. 16% and 15% were on regularly prescribed neuroactive and psychoactive medications, respectively. Of suggested PIs, 46% were acted upon during physician review, a further 4% were acknowledged in clinical notes. PIs covered many prescribing issues including drug–drug interactions, incorrect dosing, drug monitoring and administration timing. The average PI scores assigned by the pharmacist, physicians 1 and 2 differed, at 6.4, 3.2 and 4.8, respectively. Conclusion PIs suggested at senior pharmacy level are an important component of the comprehensive geriatric assessment, highlighting multiple complex prescribing issues. Clinical severity of PIs was scored lower by physicians, perhaps indicating an underestimation of prescribing errors. Senior pharmacy involvement in the care of frail older outpatients is an invaluable resource.


1994 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 1094-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert L. Siu ◽  
Lynne Morishita ◽  
Jenna Blaustein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document