scholarly journals Regaining pre-fracture basic mobility status after hip fracture and association with post-discharge mortality and readmission—a nationwide register study in Denmark

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Tange Kristensen ◽  
Buket Öztürk ◽  
Niels Dieter Röck ◽  
Annette Ingeman ◽  
Henrik Palm ◽  
...  
Gerontology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 542-548
Author(s):  
Wendy L. Cook ◽  
Penelope M.A. Brasher ◽  
Pierre Guy ◽  
Stirling Bryan ◽  
Meghan G. Donaldson ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) for older adults during hospitalization for hip fracture can improve mobility, but it is unclear whether CGC delivered after a return to community living improves mobility compared with usual post-discharge care. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To determine if an outpatient clinic-based CGC regime in the first year after hip fracture improved mobility performance at 12 months. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A two-arm, 1:1 parallel group, pragmatic, single-blind, single-center, randomized controlled trial at 3 hospitals in Vancouver, BC, Canada. Participants were community-dwelling adults, aged ≥65 years, with a hip fracture in the previous 3–12 months, who had no dementia and walked ≥10 m before the fracture occurred. Target enrollment was 130 participants. Clinic-based CGC was delivered by a geriatrician, physiotherapist, and occupational therapist. Primary outcome was the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB; 0–12) at 12 months. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We randomized 53/313 eligible participants with a mean (SD) age of 79.7 (7.9) years to intervention (<i>n</i> = 26) and usual care (UC, <i>n</i> = 27), and 49/53 (92%) completed the study. Mean 12-month (SD) SPPB scores in the intervention and UC groups were 9.08 (3.03) and 8.24 (2.44). The between-group difference was 0.9 (95% CI –0.3 to 2.0, <i>p</i> = 0.13). Adverse events were similar in the 2 groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The small sample size of less than half our recruitment target precludes definitive conclusions about the effect of our intervention. However, our results are consistent with similar studies on this population and intervention.


Author(s):  
R. Kjærsgaard Andersen ◽  
S.B. Clemmensen ◽  
L.A. Larsen ◽  
J.v.B. Hjelmborg ◽  
N. Ødum ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (7) ◽  
pp. 556-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Richards ◽  
A Glendenning ◽  
D Benson ◽  
S Alexander ◽  
S Thati

Introduction Management of hip fractures has evolved over recent years to drive better outcomes including length of hospital stay. We aimed to identify and quantify the effect that patient factors influence acute hospital and total health service length of stay. Methods A retrospective observational study based on National Hip Fracture Database data was conducted from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2015. A multiple regression analysis of 330 patients was carried out to determine independent factors that affect acute hospital and total hospital length of stay. Results American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 or above, Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) less than 8 and poor mobility status were independent factors, significantly increasing length of hospital stay in our population. Acute hospital length of stay can be predicted as 8.9 days longer when AMTS less than 8, 4.2 days longer when ASA grade was 3 or above and 20.4 days longer when unable to mobilise unaided (compared with independently mobile individuals). Other factors including total hip replacement compared with hemiarthroplasty did not independently affect length of stay. Conclusions Our analysis in a representative and generalisable population illustrates the importance of identifying these three patient characteristics in hip fracture patients. When recognised and targeted with orthogeriatric support, the length of hospital stay for these patients can be reduced and overall hip fracture care improved. Screening on admission for ASA grade, AMTS and mobility status allows prediction of length of stay and tailoring of care to match needs.


2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasa Radosavljevic ◽  
Dejan Nikolic ◽  
Milica Lazovic ◽  
Zoran Radosavljevic ◽  
Aleksandar Jeremic

<p class="p0" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-align: justify; line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: 'yes'; font-size: 12.0000pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; background: #ffffff; mso-shading: #ffffff;"><strong>Introduction:</strong> The aim of the study was to evaluate motor functional status measured by motor Functional Independence Measure (mFIM) test in population above 65 years of age after the hip fracture.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> We evaluated 203 patients after hip fracture by mFIM test on 3 occasions: at admission (Period-1), at discharge (Period-2) and 3 months after discharge (Period-3); 3 age groups: Group65-74, Group75-84 and Group85-up and 2 groups concerning Severity Index (SI): group 0-1.99 (SI1) and group ≥ 2 (SI2).<br /><strong>Results:</strong> In same SI group there is significant increase in mFIM values for Period-2 and Period-3 for both genders and in first two age groups, while for those above 85 years of age with higher SI we found non-significant change in mFIM values between discharge and 3 months post discharge period.<br /><strong>Discussion: </strong>The most significant improvement is obtained for women in first and third age groups and with higher SI.<br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Gender is not significant predictor for motor functional recovery measured by mFIM test in patients with hip fracture, although the admittance mFIM is a good indicator for mFIM capacity recovery in women of certain age groups (first and third age groups).</span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document