scholarly journals BAIT APPLICATIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF MOLE CRICKETS IN TURF, 2004

2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter T. Hertl ◽  
Rick L. Brandenburg
Keyword(s):  
Mole Crickets

scholarly journals Control of Mole Crickets on Golf Course Fairways in North Carolina, 1995

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 333-334
Author(s):  
P. T. Hertl ◽  
R. L. Brandenburg
Keyword(s):  
North Carolina ◽  
Golf Course ◽  
Mole Crickets

Development of a Toxic Bait for Control of Mole Crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae)

1987 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 659-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Kepner ◽  
S. J. Yu
Keyword(s):  
Mole Crickets

Landing Distribution and Density of Two Sound-Attracted Mole Crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae: Scapteriscus)1

1983 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Matheny ◽  
R. L. Kepner ◽  
K. M. Portier
Keyword(s):  
Mole Crickets

scholarly journals RESIDUAL ACTIVITY OF THREE INSECTICIDES TO CONTROL TAWNY MOLE CRICKETS, 2010

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen A. Buss ◽  
Paul Ruppert
Keyword(s):  
Residual Activity ◽  
Mole Crickets

The influence of wing morphology and echolocation on the gleaning ability of the insectivorous bat Myotis tricolor

2004 ◽  
Vol 82 (12) ◽  
pp. 1854-1863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Stoffberg ◽  
David S Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Foraging Behaviour ◽  
Myotis Lucifugus ◽  
The Other ◽  
Wing Morphology ◽  
Echolocation Calls ◽  
Narrow Bandwidth ◽  
Mole Crickets ◽  
Wing Tips ◽  
Wing Tip

On the basis of its external morphology, Myotis tricolor (Temminck, 1832) should be able to both aerial-feed and glean. Furthermore, this bat is known to use broadband calls of short duration, reinforcing the prediction that it gleans. However, results from this study indicate that M. tricolor does not commonly glean. This conclusion was reached after studying the foraging behaviour of M. tricolor in a flight room. We presented M. tricolor with mealworms, moths, mole crickets, beetles, and cicadas in a variety of ways that required either gleaning and (or) aerial feeding. Although M. tricolor readily took tethered prey, it did not take any of the variety of insects presented to it in a manner that required gleaning. We therefore compared its wing morphology and echolocation calls with those of several known gleaners, Nycteris thebaica E. Geoffroy, 1818, Myotis lucifugus (Le Conte, 1831), and Myotis septentrionalis (Trouessart, 1897), and an aerial forager, Neoromicia capensis (A. Smith, 1829). In a discriminant analysis wing-tip shape was the only variable to provide some degree of discrimination between species, with M. tricolor having more pointed wing tips than the known gleaners. Discriminant analysis of echolocation-call parameters grouped M. tricolor with the other Myotis species and separated it from N. capensis and N. thebaica. However, M. tricolor did not use harmonics as did the other Myotis species. The apparent failure of M. tricolor to glean might therefore be due to its relatively pointed wings and narrow-bandwidth echolocation calls, owing to the absence of harmonics in its calls.

A Soil Corer for Sampling Mole Crickets

1982 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 192 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Williams ◽  
L. N. Shaw
Keyword(s):  
Mole Crickets

Biology Coupling Characteristics of Mole Crickets' Soil-Engaging Components

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 164-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Chang-hai Zhou ◽  
Lu-quan Ren
Keyword(s):  
Mole Crickets ◽  
Coupling Characteristics
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document