scholarly journals Beneficial Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Whole Abdominal or Pelvic Radiotherapy (Waprt) on Progression Free and Overall Survival Following Primary Surgery in Patients with Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma (Occc)

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv306 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.S. Tan ◽  
T. Rye ◽  
C. Barrie ◽  
P. Shaw ◽  
A. Fyles ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Chen ◽  
Shu Wang ◽  
Jing-He Lang

Abstract Background Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a rare histologic type of ovarian cancer. There is a lack of an efficient prognostic predictive tool for OCCC in clinical work. This study aimed to construct and validate nomograms for predicting the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with OCCC. Methods Data of patients with primary diagnosed OCCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016 was extracted. Prognostic factors were evaluated with LASSO Cox regression and multivariate Cox regression analysis, which were applied to construct nomograms. The performance of the nomogram models was assessed by the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA) and risk subgroup classification. The Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare survival outcomes between subgroups. Results A total of 1541 patients from SEER registries were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 1079) and a validation cohort (n = 462). Age, laterality, stage, lymph node (LN) dissected, organ metastasis and chemotherapy were independently and significantly associated with OS, while laterality, stage, LN dissected, organ metastasis and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for CSS. Nomograms were developed for the prediction of 3- and 5-year OS and CSS. The C-indexes for OS and CSS were 0.802[95% confidence interval (CI) 0.773–0.831] and 0.802 (0.769–0.835), respectively, in the training cohort, while 0.746 (0.691–0.801) and 0.770 (0.721–0.819), respectively, in the validation cohort. Calibration plots illustrated favorable consistency between the nomogram predicted and actual survival. C-index and DCA curves also indicated better performance of nomogram than the AJCC staging system. Significant differences were observed in the survival curves of different risk subgroups. Conclusions We have constructed predictive nomograms and a risk classification system to evaluate the OS and CSS of OCCC patients. They were validated to be of satisfactory predictive value, and could aid in future clinical practice.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1143-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika Mizuno ◽  
Hiroaki Kajiyama ◽  
Kiyosumi Shibata ◽  
Kimio Mizuno ◽  
Osamu Yamamuro ◽  
...  

BackgroundIt is controversial whether patients with stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. This study was designed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes associated with the inclusion or exclusion of adjuvant therapy in these patients.MethodsA total of 185 patients who were treated for stage I CCC between 1991 and 2007 were retrospectively evaluated. All of the patients had received comprehensive surgical staging, and their condition had been diagnosed by a central pathological review system. Only one patient with stage IB was excluded from this study.ResultsMedian follow-up time was 62 months (range 7–191 months). Median age was 52 years (30–75 years). There were 41, 93, and 50 patients in stage IA, intraoperative capsule ruptured IC (rupture-IC), and all other-IC groups, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for the substage were 97.6%, 87.8%, and 70.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. Among 134 patients consisting of those in the stage IA and rupture-IC groups, 91 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and 43 patients did not (non-AC). There was no significant survival difference in each substage group between the non-AC and AC groups in 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (stage IA, 100% vs 93.8%; rupture-IC, 94.1% vs 86.6%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that there was no significant prognostic factor for both recurrence and survival among the IA and rupture-IC groups. Postoperative therapy, regimen, and chemotherapy cycles were not significantly affected.ConclusionsThis study indicates that adjuvant chemotherapy does not contribute to the improving prognosis of stage IA ovarian CCC. Whereas the histological type is CCC, the routine adjuvant chemotherapy after comprehensive surgical staging may be unnecessary for patients with at least stage IA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-180
Author(s):  
Soumyajit Roy ◽  
Paul Hoskins ◽  
Anna Tinker ◽  
Harinder Brar ◽  
Gale Bowering ◽  
...  

Background: Adjuvant treatment in early ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is not yet standardized. The objective of this population-based study was to compare the outcome of patients with early OCCC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) and evaluate the association of adjuvant radiotherapy regimens (whole abdominal radiotherapy [WART] versus pelvic nodal radiotherapy [PRT]) with outcome. Patients and Methods: Chart review was conducted to identify patients with stage I and II OCCC with complete information on staging. Patients with stage IA, IB, or IC OCCC purely resulting from capsular rupture were excluded because the provincial protocol does not recommend adjuvant treatment. Results: Overall, 403 patients were identified and 343 received adjuvant treatment, of whom 255 had stage IC or II OCCC and 153 were eligible for final analysis. On Cox multivariable regression, receipt of chemoRT (n=90) was associated with an improvement in failure-free survival (FFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34–0.94) compared with chemotherapy alone (n=63). Use of chemoRT also resulted in 54% reduction in the cumulative incidence of cancer-specific mortality (subdistribution HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24–0.89). However, there was no significant difference in the HR for overall survival (OS) between the chemoRT (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.43–1.13) and chemotherapy group. Relative to chemotherapy + WART (chemo-WART), chemotherapy + PRT (chemo-PRT) was not associated with any significant difference in HR for FFS (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.40–4.44) or OS (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.37–3.46). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemoRT was associated with a lower risk of failure compared with chemotherapy alone. However, there was no difference in OS between the adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoRT regimens. Additionally, no significant difference in terms of FFS or OS was found between the chemo-WART and chemo-PRT groups.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Chen ◽  
Shu Wang ◽  
Jing-he Lang

Abstract Background: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a rare histologic type of ovarian cancer. There is a lack of an efficient prognostic predictive tool for OCCC in clinical work. This study aimed to construct and validate nomograms for predicting the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with OCCC.Methods: Data of patients with primary diagnosed OCCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016 was extracted. Prognostic factors were evaluated with LASSO Cox regression and multivariate Cox regression analysis, which were applied to construct nomograms. The performance of the nomogram models was assessed by the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA) and risk subgroup classification. The Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare survival outcomes between subgroups.Results: A total of 1541 patients from SEER registries were randomly divided into a training cohort (n=1079) and a validation cohort (n=462). Age, laterality, stage, lymph node (LN) dissected, organ metastasis and chemotherapy were independently and significantly associated with OS, while laterality, stage, LN dissected, organ metastasis and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for CSS. Nomograms were developed for the prediction of 3‐ and 5‐year OS and CSS. The C-indexes for OS and CSS were 0.802[95% confidence interval (CI) 0.773-0.831] and 0.802 (0.769-0.835), respectively, in the training cohort, while 0.746 (0.691-0.801) and 0.770 (0.721-0.819), respectively, in the validation cohort. Calibration plots illustrated favorable consistency between the nomogram predicted and actual survival. C-index and DCA curves also indicated better performance of nomogram than the AJCC staging system. Significant differences were observed in the survival curves of different risk subgroups.Conclusions: We have constructed predictive nomograms and a risk classification system to evaluate the OS and CSS of OCCC patients. They were validated to be of satisfactory predictive value, and could aid in future clinical practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1372-1377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Nasioudis ◽  
Lakeisha Mulugeta-Gordon ◽  
Erin McMinn ◽  
Melissa K Frey ◽  
Eloise Chapman-Davis ◽  
...  

ObjectiveFertility sparing surgery for patients with early stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma is controversial. We aimed to investigate the impact of fertility sparing surgery on the oncologic outcomes of young patients with stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma.MethodsThe National Cancer Database was accessed and patients with pathological stage IA or IC ovarian clear cell carcinoma, aged <45 years, were selected. Based on site specific surgery codes, patients who underwent fertility sparing or radical surgery were identified. Overall survival was evaluated following generation of Kaplan–Meier curves, and compared with the log rank test. Multivariate Cox analysis was performed to control for possible confounders. A systematic review of literature of the Pubmed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases was also performed to summarize all reported cases.ResultsA total of 57 (35.8%) and 102 (64.2%) patients underwent fertility sparing and radical surgery. There was no difference in overall survival between patients who had fertility sparing and radical surgery (p=0.92); 5 year overall survival rates were 89% and 87.9%, respectively. After controlling for the performance of lymphadenectomy and disease substage, fertility sparing surgery was not associated with worse survival (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 2.32). A systematic review of the literature identified 132 patients with stage I disease who underwent fertility sparing surgery; a total of 20 patients (15.2%) experienced a relapse at a median of 18 months from surgery.ConclusionsIn a large cohort of young patients with stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma, fertility sparing surgery was not associated with worse survival.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Chen ◽  
Shu Wang ◽  
Jing-he Lang

Abstract Background Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a rare histologic type of ovarian cancer. There is a lack of useful prognostic predictive tool for OCCC in clinical work. This study aimed to construct and validate nomograms for predicting the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with OCCC. Methods Data of patients with primary diagnosed OCCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016 was extracted. Prognostic factors were evaluated with LASSO COX regression and multivariate Cox regression analysis, which were applied to construct nomograms. The performance of the nomogram models was assessed by concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA) and risk subgroup classification. The Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare survival outcomes between subgroups. Results A total of 1541 patients from SEER registries were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 1079) and a validation cohort (n = 462). Age, laterality, stage, lymph node (LN) dissected, organ metastasis and chemotherapy were independently and significantly associated with OS, while laterality, stage, LN dissected, organ metastasis and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for CSS. Nomograms were developed for prediction of 3- and 5‐year OS and CSS. The C-indexes for OS and CSS were 0.802[95% confidence interval (CI) 0.773–0.831] and 0.802 (0.769–0.835), respectively, in the training cohort, while 0.746 (0.691–0.801) and 0.770 (0.721–0.819), respectively, in the validation cohort. Calibration plots illustrated favorable consistency between the nomogram predicted and actual survival. C-index and DCA curves also indicated better performance of nomogram than the AJCC staging system. Significant differences were observed in survival curves of different risk subgroups. Conclusions We constructed predictive nomograms and a risk classification system to evaluate the OS and CSS of OCCC patients. They were validated to be of satisfactory predictive value, and could aid in future clinical practice.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanokwan Iramaneerat ◽  
Prakasit Rattanatunyong ◽  
Nipon Khemapech ◽  
Surang Triratanachat ◽  
Apiwat Mutirangura

Introduction:In general, ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) has a history of poor response to standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimens, and advanced cases have short survival periods. Therefore, the discovery of a biomarker for the pretreatment prediction of OCCC is crucial. Loss of methylation of a retrotransposable sequence, such as long interspersed repetitive sequence 1 (LINE-1), frequently occurs in cancers, including ovarian cancer, and it has been proven to be associated with poor survival. The expressions of human endogenous retrovirus (HERV) K and E were found to be increased in tissues from patients with OCCC. Here, we propose that methylation levels of HERV are associated with treatment response and prognosis of OCCC.Methods:Twenty-nine patients with OCCC were enrolled. Methylation levels of HERV-K, HERV-E, and LINE-1 were measured from microdissected cancer and normal ovarian tissues. The methylation levels were correlated with stage, treatment response, and prognosis.Results:Methylation levels of HERV-K, HERV-E, and LINE-1 were decreased in tissues from patients with advanced stage cancer (P= 0.0179,P= 0.0021, andP= 0.0307, respectively). Human endogenous retrovirus K demonstrated significantly lower methylation levels in the platinum-resistant group (P= 0.0004). Patients with lower levels of methylated (hypomethylated) HERV-K had a shorter mean overall survival (P= 0.006). In advanced OCCC cases, patients with hypomethylated HERV-K had shorter mean progression-free survival (P= 0.018) and mean overall survival (P= 0.018) than did patients with higher methylation levels of HERV-K.Conclusions:Methylation levels of HERV-K, HERV-E, and LINE-1 are decreased during OCCC multistep carcinogenesis. Moreover, HERV-K hypomethylation is a promising biomarker for predicting OCCC treatment response and prognosis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Nasioudis ◽  
Spyridon A. Mastroyannis ◽  
Benjamin B. Albright ◽  
Ashley F. Haggerty ◽  
Emily M. Ko ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 217s-217s
Author(s):  
J. Zhu ◽  
X. Wu ◽  
X. Ju

Background: Previous studies have indicated that patients with colorectal cancer who demonstrate defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) have clinical and pathologic features that distinguish them from patients who have proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors. However, the influence of mismatch repair (MMR) status in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is still unknown. Aim: To evaluate the MMR statuses in OCCC and its correlation with clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics. Methods: MMR statuses were measured by tissue microarray–based immunohistochemistry from 120 OCCC patients. The associations of clinicopathologic features with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis was further performed by Cox regression model. Results: Overall, 120 OCCC patients met the entry criteria and their MMR status were detected, consisting of 24 patients with dMMR and 96 patients with pMMR. Tumors with dMMR were strongly associated with platinum-sensitive disease ( P = 0.008) and large tumor volume ( P = 0.028). Among all the patients who have received surgery, tumors with dMMR had a better progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) than those with pMMR (hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence, 0.459 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.224-0.940]; P = 0.029; HR for death, 0.381 [95% CI, 0.170-0.853]; P = 0.015). In subgroup analysis, dMMR patients experienced a better PFS (HR, 0.242; P = 0.055) and OS (HR, 0.141; P = 0.039) than pMMR cases among early stages (I-II), but this difference was not observed in advanced stage (III-IV) patients. Meanwhile, pMMR was associated with more favorable prognosis than dMMR in platinum-resistant patients (PFS, HR: 0.317, P = 0.052; OS, HR: 0.370, P = 0.046). Multivariate analysis revealed that only advanced stages (III-IV) were adverse independent prognosticators for both PFS (HR, 5.938; [95% CI, 2.804-12.574], P < 0.001) and OS (HR, 6.209; [95% CI, 2.724-14.156], P < 0.001). Conclusion: MMR status in ovarian clear cell carcinoma is not only a prognostic indicator, but also appears to be a possible predictor for the use of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document