Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage I Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: Is it Necessary for Stage IA?

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1143-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika Mizuno ◽  
Hiroaki Kajiyama ◽  
Kiyosumi Shibata ◽  
Kimio Mizuno ◽  
Osamu Yamamuro ◽  
...  

BackgroundIt is controversial whether patients with stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. This study was designed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes associated with the inclusion or exclusion of adjuvant therapy in these patients.MethodsA total of 185 patients who were treated for stage I CCC between 1991 and 2007 were retrospectively evaluated. All of the patients had received comprehensive surgical staging, and their condition had been diagnosed by a central pathological review system. Only one patient with stage IB was excluded from this study.ResultsMedian follow-up time was 62 months (range 7–191 months). Median age was 52 years (30–75 years). There were 41, 93, and 50 patients in stage IA, intraoperative capsule ruptured IC (rupture-IC), and all other-IC groups, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for the substage were 97.6%, 87.8%, and 70.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. Among 134 patients consisting of those in the stage IA and rupture-IC groups, 91 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and 43 patients did not (non-AC). There was no significant survival difference in each substage group between the non-AC and AC groups in 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (stage IA, 100% vs 93.8%; rupture-IC, 94.1% vs 86.6%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that there was no significant prognostic factor for both recurrence and survival among the IA and rupture-IC groups. Postoperative therapy, regimen, and chemotherapy cycles were not significantly affected.ConclusionsThis study indicates that adjuvant chemotherapy does not contribute to the improving prognosis of stage IA ovarian CCC. Whereas the histological type is CCC, the routine adjuvant chemotherapy after comprehensive surgical staging may be unnecessary for patients with at least stage IA.

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 930-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Takei ◽  
Suzuyo Takahashi ◽  
Shizuo Machida ◽  
Akiyo Taneichi ◽  
Takahiro Yoshiba ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Nasioudis ◽  
Spyridon A. Mastroyannis ◽  
Benjamin B. Albright ◽  
Ashley F. Haggerty ◽  
Emily M. Ko ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 147 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liat Hogen ◽  
Harry Brar ◽  
Allan Covens ◽  
Dina Bassiouny ◽  
Marcus Q. Bernardini ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1239-1242
Author(s):  
Natalie YL Ngoi ◽  
Valerie Heong ◽  
Samuel Ow ◽  
Wen Yee Chay ◽  
Hee Seung Kim ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe optimal treatment of recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma remains unknown. There is increasing rationale to support the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.Primary objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of durvalumab (MEDI-4736) compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma.Study hypothesisPatients with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma treated with durvalumab will have improved progression-free survival compared with those treated with chemotherapy of physician’s choice.Trial designThe MOCCA study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II trial in patients with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma, which recruited from eight sites across Gynecologic Cancer Group Singapore (GCGS), Korean Gynecologic-Oncology Group (KGOG), and Australia New Zealand Gynecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG). Enrolled patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive durvalumab or physician’s choice of chemotherapy until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of patient consent.Major inclusion/exclusion criteriaEligible patients required histologically documented diagnosis of recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma, as evidenced by WT1 negativity. All patients must have been of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 2 or better, and have had previous treatment with, and progressed or recurred after prior platinum-based chemotherapy. No more than four prior lines of treatment were allowed and prior immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was not permitted.Primary endpointsThe primary endpoint was the median progression-free survival following treatment with durvalumab, compared with physician’s choice of chemotherapy. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the first day of treatment to the first observation of disease progression, or death due to any cause, or last follow-up.Sample sizeThe target sample size was 46 patients.Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting resultsAccrual has been completed and results are expected to be presented by mid-2021.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT03405454.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16577-e16577
Author(s):  
Yuji Takei ◽  
Hiroyuki Fujiwara ◽  
Shizuo Machida ◽  
Akiyo Taneichi ◽  
Suzuyo Takahashi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document