scholarly journals Conko-006: a Randomized Double-Blinded Phase Iib-Study of Adjuvant Therapy with Gemcitabine + Sorafenib/Placebo for Patients with R1-Resection of Pancreatic Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. v1 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sinn ◽  
T. Liersch ◽  
K. Gellert ◽  
H. Riess ◽  
P. Stübs ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 390-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Takahashi ◽  
Ravi Shridhar ◽  
Cynthia L. Harris ◽  
Justin Lee ◽  
Anjan Jayantilal Patel ◽  
...  

390 Background: Pancreatic cancer continues to have a dismal prognosis despite improvements in surgical care. Approximately 26% of patients are deemed resectable, and at the time of operation, 28% will have R1 resections. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) or chemoradiation (CRT) is recommended, however the magnitude of benefit is unclear. We sought to examine the impact these therapies on R1 resected pancreatic cancer. Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database we identified patients who underwent pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma. Patients were stratified by resection status and adjuvant therapy. Baseline comparisons of patient characteristics were made using Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis and Pearson’s Chi-square test as appropriate. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable cox proportional models(MVA) were developed to identify predictors of survival. All statistical tests were two-sided and α <0.05 was considered significant. Results: We identified 28,440 patients: 22,005 (77.4%) underwent R0 resections and 6,435 (22.4%) underwent R1 resections with a median age of 67.5 years (18-90) and median tumor size of 3.1 cm (2.4-4.2). Patients with tumor size >2cm were more likely to undergo R1 resections, p<0.001. Within the R1 resection group, AC was administered in 1,802 (19.4%), CRT 2,153 (28.5%), and no adjuvant therapy (NA) 2,480 (21.4%). Adjuvant therapy improved survival in all patients with median and 5-year survival of: AC (21.7 months, 17.45%), CRT (23.3 months, 20.9%) vs NA (19.5 months, 19.1%), p<0.001. In the R1 resection cohort survival was also improved with adjuvant therapy with CRT demonstrating the most significant improvement: AC (15.9 months, 6.5%), CRT (18.7 months. 11.2%) vs NA (12.5 months, 8.7%), p<0.001. Additionally CRT but not AC improved survival in the R1 node negative, p<0.004, and node positive, p<0.001. AC benefited survival in R1 node positive patients, p<0.001. MVA revealed age, tumor grade, tumor size >2cm, T-stage, N-stage, AC, and CRT were predictive of survival. Conclusions: Patients with pancreatic cancer who undergo R1 resection have significant improvement in survival when treated with adjuvant CRT and AC. However, benefits were greater in those receiving adjuvant CRT.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic O’Connor ◽  
Malcolm Brown ◽  
Martin Eatock ◽  
Richard C. Turkington ◽  
Gillian Prue

Abstract Background Surgical resection remains the only curative treatment for pancreatic cancer and is associated with significant post-operative morbidity and mortality. Patients eligible for surgery, increasingly receive neo-adjuvant therapy before surgery or adjuvant therapy afterward, inherently exposing them to toxicity. As such, optimizing physical function through exercise during treatment remains imperative to optimize quality of life either before surgery or during rehabilitation. However, current exercise efficacy and prescription in pancreatic cancer is unknown. Therefore, this study aims to summarise the published literature on exercise studies conducted in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing treatment with a focus on determining the current prescription and progression patterns being used in this population. Methods A systematic review of four databases identified studies evaluating the effects of exercise on aerobic fitness, muscle strength, physical function, body composition, fatigue and quality of life in participants with pancreatic cancer undergoing treatment, published up to 24 July 2020. Two reviewers independently reviewed and appraised the methodological quality of each study. Results Twelve studies with a total of 300 participants were included. Heterogeneity of the literature prevented meta-analysis. Exercise was associated with improvements in outcomes; however, study quality was variable with the majority of studies receiving a weak rating. Conclusions High quality evidence regarding the efficacy and prescription of exercise in pancreatic cancer is lacking. Well-designed trials, which have received feedback and input from key stakeholders prior to implementation, are required to examine the impact of exercise in pancreatic cancer on key cancer related health outcomes.


2002 ◽  
Vol 41 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 582-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. T. Raraty ◽  
Conor J. Magee ◽  
Paula Ghaneh ◽  
John P. Neoptolemos

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 223-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Laheru ◽  
Charles J. Yeo

2007 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-119
Author(s):  
K. V. Menon ◽  
C. S. Verbeke

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 507-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manisit Das ◽  
Limei Shen ◽  
Qi Liu ◽  
Tyler J. Goodwin ◽  
Leaf Huang

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 2464-2475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ute Distler ◽  
Jamal Souady ◽  
Marcel Hülsewig ◽  
Irena Drmić-Hofman ◽  
Jörg Haier ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document