scholarly journals Pattern of sperm transfer in redback spiders: implications for sperm competition and male sacrifice

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 785-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay S. E. Snow ◽  
Maydianne C. B. Andrade
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Sperm Transfer

scholarly journals Functional morphology of immature mating in a widow spider

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lenka Sentenská ◽  
Aileen Neumann ◽  
Yael Lubin ◽  
Gabriele Uhl
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Storage Conditions ◽  
Sperm Storage ◽  
Sperm Transfer ◽  
Costs And Benefits ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Mating Tactics ◽  
Adult Females ◽  
Storage Organs ◽  
Widow Spider

Abstract Background Mating generally occurs after individuals reach adulthood. In many arthropods including spiders, the adult stage is marked by a final moult after which the genitalia are fully developed and functional. In several widow spider species (genus Latrodectus), however, immature females may mate a few days before they moult to adulthood, i.e. in their late-subadult stage. While the “adult” mating typically results in cannibalism, males survive the “immature” mating. During both “immature” and “adult” matings, males leave parts of their paired copulatory organs within female genitalia, which may act as mating plugs. To study potential costs and benefits of the two mating tactics, we investigated female genital morphology of the brown widow spider, L. geometricus. Light microscopy, histology and micro-computed tomography of early-subadult, late-subadult and adult females were conducted to determine the overall pattern of genital maturation. We compared genitalia of mated late-subadult and adult females to reveal potential differences in the genitalic details that might indicate differential success in sperm transfer and different environments for sperm storage and sperm competition. Results We found that the paired sperm storage organs (spermathecae) and copulatory ducts are developed already in late-subadult females and host sperm after immature mating. However, the thickness of the spermathecal cuticle and the staining of the secretions inside differ significantly between the late-subadult and adult females. In late-subadult females mating plugs were found with higher probability in both spermathecae compared to adult females. Conclusions Sperm transfer in matings with late-subadult females follows the same route as in matings with adult females. The observed differences in the secretions inside the spermathecae of adult and late-subadult females likely reflect different storage conditions for the transferred sperm which may lead to a disadvantage under sperm competition if the subadult female later re-mates with another male. However, since males mating with late-subadult females typically transfer sperm to both spermathecae they might benefit from numerical sperm competition as well as from monopolizing access to the female sperm storage organs. The assessment of re-mating probability and relative paternity will clarify the costs and benefits of the two mating tactics in light of these findings.

VARIATION OF SPERM PRECEDENCE IN THE ROVE BEETLE ALEOCHARA CURTULA (COLEOPTERA: STAPHYLINIDAE)

Behaviour ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 136 (9) ◽  
pp. 1065-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Mating System ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Dna Fingerprinting ◽  
Sperm Transfer ◽  
Sperm Precedence ◽  
Oligonucleotide Probes ◽  
Mating Experiment ◽  
Rove Beetle ◽  
Mixed Paternity ◽  
Aleochara Curtula

AbstractIn order to quantify the outcome of sperm competition in the mating system of the rove beetle Aleochara curtula we performed three different mating experiment series. Paternity was established by DNA fingerprinting with oligonucleotide probes. We found a precedence of the last male with a proportion of eggs fathered by the last male of 87% (median). Nevertheless, we observed a large variation of P2-values in A. curtula and cases of mixed paternity were documented as well as cases of 100% or 0% paternity of the last male. The variation of P2-values correlates with the efficiency of spermatophore and sperm transfer.

scholarly journals Divergent allocation of sperm and the seminal proteome along a competition gradient in Drosophila melanogaster

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (36) ◽  
pp. 17925-17933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben R. Hopkins ◽  
Irem Sepil ◽  
Marie-Laëtitia Thézénas ◽  
James F. Craig ◽  
Thomas Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Seminal Fluid ◽  
Sperm Transfer ◽  
Male Mating ◽  
Compositional Change ◽  
Seminal Fluid Proteins ◽  
Allocation Rules ◽  
Offspring Production ◽  
Component Allocation

Sperm competition favors large, costly ejaculates, and theory predicts the evolution of allocation strategies that enable males to plastically tailor ejaculate expenditure to sperm competition threat. While greater sperm transfer in response to a perceived increase in the risk of sperm competition is well-supported, we have a poor understanding of whether males (i) respond to changes in perceived intensity of sperm competition, (ii) use the same allocation rules for sperm and seminal fluid, and (iii) experience changes in current and future reproductive performance as a result of ejaculate compositional changes. Combining quantitative proteomics with fluorescent sperm labeling, we show that Drosophila melanogaster males exercise independent control over the transfer of sperm and seminal fluid proteins (SFPs) under different levels of male–male competition. While sperm transfer peaks at low competition, consistent with some theoretical predictions based on sperm competition intensity, the abundance of transferred SFPs generally increases at high competition levels. However, we find that clusters of SFPs vary in the directionality and sensitivity of their response to competition, promoting compositional change in seminal fluid. By tracking the degree of decline in male mating probability and offspring production across successive matings, we provide evidence that ejaculate compositional change represents an adaptive response to current sperm competition, but one that comes at a cost to future mating performance. Our work reveals a previously unknown divergence in ejaculate component allocation rules, exposes downstream costs of elevated ejaculate investment, and ultimately suggests a central role for ejaculate compositional plasticity in sexual selection.

scholarly journals Evolution of deceit by worthless donations in a nuptial gift-giving spider

2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Giovanni Ghislandi ◽  
Maria J. Albo ◽  
Cristina Tuni ◽  
Trine Bilde
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Mating Success ◽  
Prey Capture ◽  
Sperm Transfer ◽  
Nuptial Gift ◽  
Gift Giving ◽  
Sexual Competition ◽  
Alternative Mating Strategy ◽  
Foraging Preferences ◽  
The Gift

Abstract Males of the nursery web spider Pisaura mirabilis usually offer an insect prey wrapped in white silk as a nuptial gift to facilitate copulation. Males exploit female foraging preferences in a sexual context as females feed on the gift during copulation. It is possible for males to copulate without a gift, however strong female preference for the gift leads to dramatically higher mating success for gift-giving males. Females are polyandrous, and gift-giving males achieve higher mating success, longer copulations, and increased sperm transfer that confer advantages in sperm competition. Intriguingly, field studies show that approximately one third of males carry a worthless gift consisting of dry and empty insect exoskeletons or plant fragments wrapped in white silk. Silk wrapping disguises gift content and females are able to disclose gift content only after accepting and feeding on the gift, meanwhile males succeed in transferring sperm. The evolution of deceit by worthless gift donation may be favoured by strong intra-sexual competition and costs of gift-construction including prey capture, lost foraging opportunities and investment in silk wrapping. Females that receive empty worthless gifts terminate copulation sooner, which reduces sperm transfer and likely disadvantages males in sperm competition. The gift-giving trait may thus become a target of sexually antagonistic co-evolution, where deceit by worthless gifts leads to female resistance to the trait. We discuss factors such as female mating rate and intensity of sperm competition that may shape the evolution of male deception, and how ecological factors may influence the evolution and maintenance of worthless gifts as an evolutionarily stable alternative mating strategy by frequency dependent selection.

scholarly journals Female × male and male × male interactions have limited influence on competitive fertilization inDrosophila melanogaster

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Lüpold ◽  
Jonathan Bradley Reil ◽  
Mollie K. Manier ◽  
Valérian Zeender ◽  
John M. Belote ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Female Choice ◽  
Sperm Storage ◽  
Sperm Transfer ◽  
Cryptic Female Choice ◽  
Complex Interactions ◽  
Sexually Selected Traits ◽  
Selected Traits ◽  
Reproductive Events

AbstractHow males and females contribute to joint reproductive success has been a long-standing question in sexual selection. Under postcopulatory sexual selection (PSS), paternity success is predicted to derive from complex interactions among females engaging in cryptic female choice and males engaging in sperm competition. Such interactions have been identified as potential sources of genetic variation in sexually selected traits but are also expected to inhibit trait diversification. To date, studies of interactions between females and competing males have focused almost exclusively on genotypes and not phenotypic variation in sexually selected traits. Here, we characterize within- and between-sex interactions inDrosophila melanogasterusing isogenic lines with heritable variation in both male and female traits known to influence competitive fertilization. We found surprisingly few genotypic interaction effects on various stages of PSS such as female remating interval, copulation duration, sperm transfer, or sperm storage. Only the timing of female sperm ejection depended on female × male genotypic interactions. By contrast, several reproductive events, including sperm transfer, female sperm ejection and sperm storage, were explained by two- and three-way interactions among sex-specific phenotypes. We also documented complex interactions between the lengths of competing males’ sperm and the female seminal receptacle, which are known to have experienced rapid female-male co-diversification. Our results highlight the non-independence of sperm competition and cryptic female choice and demonstrate that complex interactions between the sexes do not limit the ability of multivariate systems to respond to directional sexual selection.Significance statementFor species with internal fertilization and female promiscuity, postcopulatory sexual selection (PSS) is believed to depend, in part, on complex interactions between rival males and between the sexes. Although little investigated, clarifying such interactions is critical as they may limit the efficacy of PSS in the diversification of reproductive traits (e.g., ejaculate biochemistry and sperm, genitalia and female reproductive tract morphology). Here, we resolve how sex-specific traits and their interactions contribute to key reproductive events and outcomes related to competitive fertilization success, including traits known to have experienced rapid diversification. Our results provide novel insights into the operation and complexity of PSS and demonstrate that the processes of sperm competition and cryptic female choice are not independent selective forces.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document