364 The Cycling Urologist: Effect on PSA, Haematuria, Pudendal Nerve Entrapment and Cyclists Nodules

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Peacock ◽  
J Cobley ◽  
B Patel

Abstract Aim Cycle use has vastly increased over the last few years in the UK. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effect of cycling on the common conditions presenting to the urology clinic, in particular those of raised PSA, haematuria, soft tissue lesions (“cyclist nodules”) and pudendal nerve entrapment syndromes. Method A PUBMED search of the literature on cycling and genitourinary disorders was performed. The keywords included “Bicycling” AND “Prostate-specific antigen”, “Bicycling” AND “Haematuria”, “Bicycling” AND “Cyclist Nodules”, “Bicycling” AND “Pudendal Nerve Entrapment”. Results The literature suggests no significant change in total PSA levels after a bout of cycling, regardless of age. The type of cycling (mountain biking vs. road cycling) does not influence PSA levels. It is possible that the saddle used in cycling may displace the pressure across the perineal and gluteal region to effectively alleviate pressure on the prostate. Haematuria appears to be rare with cycling but has been described. Perineal nodular induration is a very rare - although possibly under diagnosed condition. It is thought to be caused by repetitive micro trauma from contact between the perineum and saddle. Pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) represents the most common bicycling associated urogenital problem. Numbness in the perineum, penis, scrotum or the buttocks is the most common and most recognised symptom. Genital numbness may occur unrelated to erectile dysfunction (ED) although cycling related ED is invariably associated with genital numbness. Conclusions Urology Trainees and Consultants should be aware of how recreational and high-level cycling may result in presentation to the Urology clinic.

2020 ◽  
pp. 205141582096498
Author(s):  
J Peacock ◽  
J Cobley ◽  
B Patel

Cycle use has grown rapidly over the last few years in the UK. British Cycling membership has increased threefold since the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games, and this is likely to rise in the wake of the Coronavirus pandemic. As urologists, day-to-day encounters with cyclists are commonplace, who may present with acute traumatic injuries or chronic overuse injuries. The aim of this literature review was to evaluate the effect of cycling on conditions presenting to the urology clinic, in particular those of raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA), haematuria and soft-tissue lesions (‘cyclist nodules’). Furthermore, the review aimed to summarize the relationship between cycling and pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) syndromes. A PubMed search of the literature on cycling and genitourinary disorders was performed. The literature suggests no significant change in PSA levels after a bout of cycling. Age appears to have no effect on the change in PSA experienced following a bout of cycling, in particular when comparing those <50 years of age to those >50 years of age. Haematuria appears to be rare with cycling but has been described, even with stationary bike riding. It is imperative to exclude coexisting urinary-tract pathological conditions, and cycling-induced haematuria should always be considered a diagnosis of exclusion. Perineal nodular induration (‘cyclist nodules’) is a rare condition, related to pressure and repetitive micro-trauma between the perineum and saddle. Pudendal Nerve Entrapment (PNE) represents the most common bicycling-associated urogenital complaint. Numbness in the perineum, penis, scrotum or buttocks—‘genital numbness’—is the most common and most recognized symptom of pudendal compression. Despite several studies demonstrating a link between elite cyclists and erectile dysfunction, for the average cyclist riding may actually have a protective effect on sexual function.


Author(s):  
Fouad Aoun ◽  
Georges Mjaess ◽  
Eddy Lilly ◽  
Nour Khalil ◽  
Georges Abi Tayeh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 695-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Dickson ◽  
Patrick Higgins ◽  
Rishabh Sehgal ◽  
Kim Gorissen ◽  
Oliver Jones ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. E9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron G. Filler

Object To improve diagnostic accuracy and achieve high levels of treatment success in patients with pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) syndromes, the author of this study applied advanced technology diagnostics in distinguishing the various syndrome types according to the different entrapment locations and evaluated new minimal access surgical techniques to treat each subtype. Methods Two hundred cases were prospectively evaluated using a standardized set of patient-completed functional and symptom assessments, a collection of new physical examination maneuvers, MR neurography, open MR image–guided injections, intraoperative neurophysiology, minimal access surgery, and formal outcome assessment with the Oswestry Disability Index, pain diagrams, and analog pain scales. Results Four primary types of PNE syndromes were identified based on the different locations of entrapment: Type I, entrapment at the exit of the greater sciatic notch in concert with piriformis muscle spasm; Type II, entrapment at the level of the ischial spine, sacrotuberous ligament, and lesser sciatic notch entrance; Type III, entrapment in association with obturator internus muscle spasm at the entrance of the Alcock canal; and Type IV, distal entrapment of terminal branches. The application of new, targeted minimal access surgical techniques led to sustained good to excellent outcomes (50–100% improvement in the pain score or functional score) in 87% of patients. Most of these patients obtained most of their improvement within 4 weeks of surgery, although some continued to experience progressive improvements up to 12 months after surgery. Conclusions The application of advanced diagnostics to categorize PNE syndrome origins into 4 major subtypes and the subsequent treatment of each subtype with a tailored strategy greatly improved therapeutic outcomes as compared with those reported when only a single treatment paradigm was applied to all patients.


Pain ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Beco ◽  
Jack Mouchel ◽  
Thomas Mouchel ◽  
Jean-Pierre Spinosa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document