1287 A Comparison of Surgical Decompression and Steroid Injections to Treat Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
F La Costa

Abstract Introduction Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is caused by compression of the median nerve at the wrist. It accounts for 90% of all entrapment neuropathies, with a 7-16% in the UK. It has a significant impact on patients’ daily lives. Clinically, CTS results in paraesthesia, while extreme cases may involve muscular atrophy and weakness. There is currently a disparity between optimal treatments for CTS. Therefore, this paper aims to identify the optimal treatment for CTS with post-treatment BCTQ (Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire) scores (including both functional and symptomatic severity) at 1, 3 and 6 months. Method The BCTQ scores for were sited from PubMed, Google Scholar and the University of Dundee Library search engine by entering key words such as “carpal tunnel syndrome”, “surgical decompression”, “surgical release” and “steroid injection”. Means and standard deviations for pre- and post-treatment after 1, 3 and 6 months were obtained. From this, forest plots were constructed using a software where steroid injection and surgical decompression were inputted separately, and effect sizes were then compared for 1, 3 and 6 months. Results The meta-analysis included reviewing 133 articles. The effect size was determined using the random effects model. Steroid injection was more effective than surgical decompression after 1 and 3 months. However, after 6 months, surgical decompression was more effective. Conclusions Identification of long-term relief of CTS through surgical decompression allows the reduction of symptom recurrence and thus costly follow-up appointments. This study provides robust clinical findings for the optimal treatment of CTS.

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110017
Author(s):  
Saskia F. de Roo ◽  
Philippe N. Sprangers ◽  
Erik T. Walbeehm ◽  
Brigitte van der Heijden

We performed a systematic review on the success of different surgical techniques for the management of recurrent and persistent carpal tunnel syndrome. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and were grouped by the type of revision carpal tunnel release, which were simple open release, open release with flap coverage or open release with implant coverage. Meta-analysis showed no difference, and pooled success proportions were 0.89, 0.89 and 0.85 for simple open carpal tunnel release, additional flap coverage and implant groups, respectively. No added value for coverage of the nerve was seen. Our review indicates that simple carpal tunnel release without additional coverage of the median nerve seems preferable as it is less invasive and without additional donor site morbidity. We found that the included studies were of low quality with moderate risk of bias and did not differentiate between persistent and recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document