Statistical characterization of the random errors in the radioimmunoassay dose--response variable.

1976 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Rodbard ◽  
R H Lenox ◽  
H L Wray ◽  
D Ramseth

Abstract We have developed practical methods for evaluating the magnitude of the random errors in radioimmunoassay dose--response variables, and the relationship between this error and position on the dose--response curve. This is important: to obtain appropriate weights for each point on the dose--response curve when utilizing least-squares curve-fitting methods; to evaluate whether the standards and the unknowns are subject to error of the same magnitude; for quality-control purposes; and to study the sources of errors in radioimmunoassay. Both standards and unknowns in radioimmunoassays for cAMP and cGMP were analyzed in triplicate. The same mean (Y), sample standard deviation, sy, and variance (2-y) of the response variable were calculated for each dose level. The relationship between s 2-y and y was calculated utilizing several models. Results for standards and unknowns from several assays were pooled, and a curve smoothing procedure was used to minimize random sampling errors. This pooling increased the reliability of the analysis, and confirmed the presence of the theoretically predicted nonuniformity of variance. Thus, the calculation of results from these radioimmunoassays should utilize a weighted least-squares curve-fitting program. These analyses have been computerized, and can be used as a "pre-processor" for programs for routine analysis of results of radioimmunoassay.

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 996-1006
Author(s):  
Hou Kuan Tam ◽  
Lap Mou Tam ◽  
Afshin J. Ghajar ◽  
Pak Hang Fu ◽  
Cheong Sun

2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 244 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Easton ◽  
S.R. Hirsch ◽  
I. Das ◽  
L. Kidane ◽  
A.J. Richardson ◽  
...  

Dose-Response ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. dose-response.0 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abraham Peper

It is generally assumed that there exists a well-defined relationship between drug dose and drug effect and that this can be expressed by a dose-response curve. This paper argues that there is no such clear relation and that the dose-response curve provides only limited information about the drug effect. It is demonstrated that tolerance development during the measurement of the dose-response curve may cause major distortion of the curve and it is argued that the curve may only be used to indicate the response to the first administration of a drug, before tolerance has developed. The precise effect of a drug on an individual depends on the dynamic relation between several variables, particularly the level of tolerance, the dose anticipated by the organism and the actual drug dose. Simulations with a previously published mathematical model of drug tolerance demonstrate that the effect of a dose smaller than the dose the organism has developed tolerance to is difficult to predict and may be opposite to the action of the usual dose.


1977 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Rodbard ◽  
S W McClean

Abstract The dose/response curve in enzyme-multiplied immunoassays (EMIT) and related techniques may be described by the same "four-parameter logistic function" as has proven useful in radioimmunoassays, immunoradiometric assays (IRMA), and two-site immunoradiometric ("sandwhich") assays. This function provides an empirical description of the dose/response curve by use of an objective least-squares regression analysis, with the advantages of computerization and automation. This facilitates further statistical analyses, quality control, estimation of precision for an unknown, and improved, objective estimation of the sensitivity or minimal detectable dose.


1967 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 619-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Jacob Koed ◽  
Christian Hamburger

ABSTRACT Comparison of the dose-response curves for LH of ovine origin (NIH-LH-S8) and of human origin (IRP-HMG-2) using the OAAD test showed a small, though statistically significant difference, the dose-response curve for LH of human origin being a little flatter. Two standard curves for ovine LH obtained with 14 months' interval, were parallel but at different levels of ovarian ascorbic acid. When the mean ascorbic acid depletions were calculated as percentages of the control levels, the two curves for NIH-LH-S8 were identical. The use of standards of human origin in the OAAD test for LH activity of human preparations is recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document