DOZ047.124: Thoracoscopic anatomy of long-gap esophageal atresia. What can we predict?

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Rasiewicz ◽  
K Świątek ◽  
S Gerus ◽  
D Patkowski

Abstract Since the very beginning in 1999, thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia has become a gold standard in many pediatric surgery centers worldwide. Despite the advances in surgical technique, treatment of long-gap esophageal atresia still remains a challenge. The aim of this study is to assess whether the localization of esophageal stumps can predict number of stages needed to perform anastomosis. We analyzed video records of 21 patients who underwent staged thoracoscopic repair of long-gap esophageal atresia using internal traction technique. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. We divided patients into two groups: first requiring single internal traction procedure, second who underwent multiple procedures. We assessed esophageal stump position in relation to thoracic vertebrae. The distance between stumps was measured in vertebral bodies. Mean distance between esophageal ends was 5.8 in single traction group. The distance between the stumps was significantly greater in multiple procedures group: 7.33 (P = 0.003). Patients who required multiple procedures had significantly lower localization of distal stump. Localization of proximal stump did not affect the possibility for anastomosis after single traction. Distance between both ends after internal traction was also significantly longer in multiple procedures group. Patients with lower localization of distal esophageal stump assessed during primary thoracoscopy are at higher risk for requiring multiple surgical procedures.

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1384-1392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisanne J. Stolwijk ◽  
David C. van der Zee ◽  
Stefaan Tytgat ◽  
Desiree van der Werff ◽  
Manon J. N. L. Benders ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Valfre ◽  
A Conforti ◽  
M Scuglia ◽  
L Aite ◽  
F Bevilacqua ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim of the Study Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) represents the most challenging spectrum of esophageal atresia (EA). This condition is poorly defined, particularly regarding long-term sequelae. The aim of this study was to evaluate mid-term outcomes of patients with LGEA. Methods A longitudinal prospective study was performed of all EA patients treated at our institution from January 2008 to December 2016. Patients were followed up in a dedicated multidisciplinary outpatient clinic. LGEA was defined as a gap wider than 3 vertebral bodies at preoperative gap measurement. Data were collected with specific attention to auxological outcomes, esophageal dilations, antireflux procedures, redo-esophageal surgery, readmission, and dysphagic problems. Chi-squared test and Mann–Whitney test were used as appropriate; P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results During the study period, 183 EA patients were treated, 52 with LGEA. Of those, 151 reached a minimum of 1-year follow-up and were enrolled into this study. Long-gap vs non-long-gap: weight 1st year, gr; 6800 vs 8800 P < 0.0001; weight 2nd year 9500 gr vs 11000 p < 0.0001. BMI 1st year, median 14,75 vs 15,64 p 0.04; BMI 2nd year, median 15,18 vs 15 p 0.9; N° dilations 1st year, median 3 vs 1 P < 0.0001, N° dilations 2nd year, median 1 vs 0 P < 0.0001; Nissen 1st year, n (%) 9 vs 3 p 0.0019; Nissen 2nd year, n (%) 12 vs 4 p 0.0002. Redo-esophageal surgery 1st year, n (%) 7 vs 7 p 0.14. Redo-esophageal surgery 2nd year, n (%) 8 vs 0 < 0.0001. Readmission 1st year, median 4 vs 2 P < 0.0001; readmission 2nd year, median 3 vs 0 P < 0.0001. Oral aversion 1st year, n (%) 27 vs 10 P < 0.0001; oral aversion 2nd year, n (%) 17 vs 6 P < 0.0001. Dysphagia 1st year, n (%) 25 vs 18 P < 0.0001; dysphagia 2nd year, n (%) 14 vs 19 p 0.13. Conclusions LGEA patients underwent a more challenging course at follow-up, experiencing late auxological, more esophageal and GERD-related problems, and increased feeding and swallowing disorders in comparison with non-LGEA patients. A longer follow-up study is warranted to describe late and/or persistent problems.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahisa Tainaka ◽  
Hiroo Uchida ◽  
Akihide Tanano ◽  
Chiyoe Shirota ◽  
Akinari Hinoki ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Patkowski ◽  
S Gerus ◽  
M Rasiewicz

Abstract Treatment of long-gap esophageal atresia poses a great challenge for a surgeon. A new multistage thoracoscopic repair of long-gap esophageal atresia using internal traction technique was developed that evolved with time and growing experience. The goal of this study is to present the changes in the strategy and important technical aspects of the operative method based on a retrospective analysis of performed surgeries. Methods and Materials Thirty-five cases of newborns with long-gap esophageal atresia (type A-26 cases and B-9 cases exclusively) were operated thoracoscopically between 2008 and 2019 using internal traction technique in different pediatric surgery centers (Poland–28, Czech–1, Ukraine–1, Switzerland–2, Egypt–2, Russia–1). The idea of the internal traction technique was to place the suture between thoracoscopically mobilized esophageal pouches and keep a static tension between them for a period of time. Patients were operated on as early as it was possible after birth. Results Of the 35 newborns operated on using internal traction 2 patients died before the final stage from not surgically-related causes. Two patients had complications that required neck fistula and had later Collis–Nissen and colon interposition, respectively. One case is awaiting the final procedure. For 31 cases the final esophageal anastomosis was completed in two stages–16 cases, three stages–9, four stages–2, five stages–2, and six stages–1. At the beginning the time between stages was planned for 4 weeks (for some cases it was even longer) and it was shortened for the last three cases to 5 days. It allowed avoiding gastrostomy in two cases. The internal traction was modified from using two traction loops to one traction loop with two slipping knots on each branch of the loop. The clips were applied transversely through the tip of each pouch and part of the traction loop to prevent disruption and pouch perforation. It also allowed increasing of the created static traction force. Conclusion Results of the study may indicate that in a majority of long-gap esophageal atresia it is possible to preserve the native esophagus by a thoracoscopic approach using an internal traction suture technique. Shortened time between stages allowed completion of the final esophageal anastomosis with gastrostomy avoidance.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1510-1512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartosz Bogusz ◽  
Dariusz Patkowski ◽  
Sylwester Gerus ◽  
Marcin Rasiewicz ◽  
Wojciech Górecki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document