scholarly journals P781 Prevalence of antinuclear antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease and seroconversion after biological therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S618-S618
Author(s):  
M J García García ◽  
J C Rodriguez-Duque ◽  
M T Arias Loste ◽  
B Castro Senosiain ◽  
J Crespo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Higher levels of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are detected in healthy populations with a prevalence of 6%. In autoimmune disorders it reaches 50–80%. In patients under TNF, the prevalence of positive ANA observed was 40% and occasionally may induce lupus like syndrome (LLS). However, there is a lack of evidence about the global prevalence in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and insufficient data about seroconversion of ANA after the beginning of biological therapy. Methods A unicentric transversal study of 879 IBD patients was designed. ANA determination was performed by immunofluorescence assay. IBD patients were classified according to the biological therapy. Presence and of ANA and titres were collected previously to the beginning of anti-TNF therapy. LLS symptoms were collected in a retrospective way. Results A valid result of ANA was obtained in 862 patients. Patients with any autoimmune disease which involve positive ANA were excluded. Positive ANA was reported in 13.62% of IBD patients. The prevalence of ANA was 28.67% in those patients under biological therapy (p < 0.001), especially if the biological treatment was anti-TNF. No significative difference was observed in those patients receiving ustekinumab or vedolizumab therapy. Positive ANA was observed in 4.67% for combined treatment with immunomodulator and biological therapy. In contrast, if the patient received only biological therapy, positive ANA was collected in 24 % (p < 0.001). A reduction in albumin levels and higher levels of IgG and IgM were related to positive ANA. It is important to highlight that a percentage of 53.45% positive ANA had never received biological therapy in the previous 5 years; that means, a 7.28% prevalence in the global cohort. A 48.15% of the patients had ANAs previous to the beginning of biological therapy. ANAs seroconversion was observed in 73.08% of the patients after the treatment. Conclusion IBD patients have a 13.62% prevalence of positive ANA; higher than prevalence in healthy population. The presence of ANA is frequently associated in patients under anti-TNF treatment and decreases with immunomodulator therapy associated to anti-TNF. It is unknown if positive ANA in IBD patients could be conditioned to the future development of other autoimmune disorders. Prospective studies are necessary to clarify these aspects.

Gut ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matti Waterman ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
Amreen Dinani ◽  
A Hillary Steinhart ◽  
Kenneth Croitoru ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-497
Author(s):  
Adhan Amenomori WU ◽  
Jaqueline Ribeiro de BARROS ◽  
Madhoor RAMDEEN ◽  
Julio Pinheiro BAIMA ◽  
Rogerio SAAD-HOSSNE ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Biological therapy and new drugs have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Ideally, the choice of medication should be a shared decision with the patient, aiming at greater satisfaction, compliance, and consequently, favorable clinical outcome. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate patient’s preferences in the choice of their therapy and the factors that influence this choice. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled 101 outpatients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and no previous exposure to biological therapy. Patients’ preferences were assessed through questions that addressed the preferred mode of administration (oral, subcutaneous, or intravenous) and the factors that determined the choice of medication (efficacy, medical indication, fear of medication, convenience, mode of application, and personal doctors’ indication). RESULTS: The mean age was 43.6±13.5 years, 75.3% were female, and 81.2% were cases of ulcerative colitis. Regarding the mode of administration, the majority of patients preferred oral (87.1%), followed by intravenous (6.93%) and subcutaneous (5.94%) medications. The reasons were “I prefer to take it at home” (42.57%), “I have more freedom” (36.63%), “I don’t like self-application” (29.70%), and “I believe it works better” (19.80%). Younger patients and patients in clinical disease activity preferred intravenous mode compared to the oral route (P<0.05). Doctor’s opinion (98%) was an important factor associated with the medication choice. CONCLUSION: Oral route was the preferred mode of administration and most patients took their physician’s opinion into account in their choice of medication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document